Zuma squabbles have everyone asking: Who’s running South Africa?
It’s hard to know who’s leading South Africa.
Last week the presidency repudiated the mines minister when he caused a storm of protest from business leaders by saying the Cabinet authorised a judicial inquiry into banking oversight bodies after lenders cut ties to the Gupta family, who are friends of President Jacob Zuma. That came as Finance Minister Pravin Gordhan is being investigated on allegations of contravening intelligence laws.
“There is a clear lack of national leadership,” said Theo Venter, a political analyst at North-West University in Potchefstroom, west of Johannesburg.
“The governing party is like a headless chicken.
We are in a leadership quagmire.”
Zuma, 74, has received much of the blame for the chaos. He’s been implicated in numerous scandals, including a finding by the nation’s top court that he violated the Constitution by failing to repay taxpayer funds spent on his private home. Senior officials have claimed the Guptas offered them Cabinet posts. The controversies have weighed on the rand and the nation’s bonds and heightened the risk of the country’s credit rating being downgraded to junk by the end of the year.
Mineral Resources Minister Mosebenzi Zwane’s comments about a banking oversight review and the presidency’s rebuttal illustrate the extent to which the Cabinet is divided, said Aubrey Matshiqi, a political analyst at the Helen Suzman Foundation, a Johannesburg-based research group.
“The president as the centre is not holding, the ANC is not holding, the Cabinet as a centre is not holding,” Matshiqi said by phone. “That means we are either there, or getting close to a situation where the state is not holding.”
ANC spokesman Zizi Kodwa denied that the party and country faced a leadership crisis.
Zwane “made a reckless and careless statement”, Kodwa said by phone from Johannesburg. “It’s just an act of ill-discipline on his behalf. I don’t think it’s symptomatic of anything bigger.”
Zwane was part of a group assigned by the Cabinet to look into why South Africa’s biggest banks closed the accounts of companies linked to the Gupta family.
Misgivings about whether Zuma was the right person to steer Africa’s most industrialised economy surfaced even before he took office in May 2009 — just weeks after prosecutors dropped 783 corruption charges against him. The Democratic Alliance, the main opposition party, has been fighting ever since to have the case reinstated and won a major battle this year when the Pretoria high court ruled that prosecutors had acted irrationally — a finding that’s being appealed in the Constitutional Court.
Zuma was widely criticised for abusing his position after it emerged that the state had spent R215.9-million on renovations to his rural homestead that included a swimming pool, animal enclosures and an amphitheatre — alterations the president denied requesting.
Zuma also stood accused of allowing the Guptas, who were in business with his son Duduzane and employed one of his four wives, to use an air force base to transport guests to a private wedding. He denied any responsibility.
The president’s leadership was called into question in December last year when he replaced respected Finance Minister Nhlanhla Nene with little-known lawmaker David van Rooyen. Four days later, he named Gordhan to the post after coming under pressure from ruling party and business leaders to halt a run on the rand and the nation’s bonds. Deputy Finance Minister Mcebisi Jonas later alleged that the Guptas offered him Nene’s post in exchange for business concessions, an allegation the family dismissed as a political ploy. Zuma denied delegating his power to make appointments.
Wrangling over control of the nation’s finances has continued unabated. Zuma has dismissed Gordhan’s request to fire the nation’s tax chief for insubordination and delayed his attempts to appoint a new board at the state-owned airline.
Last month, a special police investigative unit known as the Hawks said Gordhan may be charged in connection with allegations that he established an illicit investigative unit when he headed the South African Revenue Service — a case opposition parties said Zuma may use to appoint a more pliant head of the national treasury. Zuma said that although Gordhan has his full support, the law must take its course.
“It shows the extent to which the Cabinet is divided,” Matshiqi said. “We are now closer to being downgraded than we were before the Hawks-Pravin story broke.”
Gwede Mantashe, the ANC’s secretary general, criticised how the police treated the finance minister and rebuked party officials who spoke out against Gordhan. His deputy Jessie Duarte and Van Rooyen, now the local government minister, had accused Gordhan of portraying himself as being above the law by refusing to present himself to the Hawks for questioning. Gordhan said his lawyers had advised him he was under no legal obligation to do so and has denied any wrongdoing.
The repeated crises have raised question marks over whether the country’s leaders have the ability to do their jobs and what motivates them, according to Ivor Sarakinsky, a lecturer at the University of the Witwatersrand’s school of governance.
“There is clearly a leadership vacuum,” Sarakinsky said. “People who should lead don’t, and there are a large number of people jockeying for policies that don’t fit in with government’s priorities.” - Bloomberg