Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Tourism in Africa loses R343-million per year through elephant poaching

African countries with elephant populations are losing R343-million a year through poaching, according to new research. This is the direct cost of lost income from tourism.

That is according to new research published in the peer-reviewed journal Nature Communications. Titled Estimated economic losses to tourism in Africa from the illegal killing of elephants, it looked at tourist visits to protected areas and at how these had declined as poaching increased. Some 100 000 elephant are thought to have been killed on the continent in the last decade. But accurate numbers are impossible to come by because there are no numbers on the total number of elephant on the continent.

The researchers, from the World Wide Fund for Nature and several universities, said: “Across Africa the annual, direct economic losses due to elephant poaching run to a mean of $9.1-million (R122-million).” Indirect costs – in losses to the people and industries that support tourism – run to $16.4-million (R221-million).

Four elephants are killed every hour on the continent – but researchers said this cost is dwarfed by the profits being made by poachers. It said that ivory sales were worth R8-billion a year on Chinese black markets.

That profit means the costs to conserve elephant are high. But the researchers concluded that these costs are less than the income that would be generated from tourism, if elephant are kept alive.

To get to that conclusion, the team looked at the costs of halting elephant poaching across the continent. On average, this ran to the tune of nearly R8 000 a square kilometre. For that much money, poaching could be almost halted in the 58 protected areas that have over 1 000 elephant.

The research said: “Tourist’s willingness to pay is sufficient to offset the increased costs necessary to safeguard elephant populations.”

But the numbers do not work for elephant in the heavily forested areas of central Africa. These have the fewest tourists, but the highest rate of poaching. Two-thirds of the continental cost for stopping poaching would have to be spent here. The cost of saving elephant would be 100% more than the income they generate through tourism.

For these elephant populations, the researchers say their survival depends on “public concern” and their “existence value”.

The case is much better for the rest of the continent. In southern Africa, tourism from elephants would generate 54% more income than the cost of keeping them alive. That ratio is even better in eastern and western Africa. “The lost benefit exceeds the anti-poaching costs necessary to stop elephant declines across the continent’s savannah areas.”

Saving Africa’s elephants make economic sense.

Vote for an informed choice

We’re dropping the paywall this week so that everyone can access all our stories for free, and get the information they need in the run up to the local government elections. For the latest updates and political analysis, sign up to our daily elections newsletter.

If our coverage helps inform your decision, cast your vote for an informed public and join our subscriber community. Right now, a full year’s access is just R510, half the usual cost. Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.

Sipho Kings
Sipho Kings is the acting editor-in-chief of the Mail & Guardian

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Latest stories

The bins get emptied ahead of voting day, but will...

The Tembisa 10 may be a figment of somebody’s imagination, but Eskom’s Misery Twins are not

Local government elections: Why it’s rational to vote with your...

Voting tactically may seem like a realistic, mature option, but it compromises the integrity of your vote and is corrosive to the long-term health of democracy

SA proposes new climate finance target ahead of COP26

Long-standing issues on climate finance will make or break COP26, says environment, forestry and fisheries minister

Local government elections: Port Edwards’ residents rely on ‘holy’ water...

The Ugu district municipality has, for years, failed to provide a constant source of clean water and parties are pitching their elections campaigns around the crisis
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×