Israel is an apartheid state. Dump the report, says UN

Double standards: Israel is not treated the same as other states that breach international norms. Photo: Hazem Bader/AFP

Double standards: Israel is not treated the same as other states that breach international norms. Photo: Hazem Bader/AFP

When the Special Committee against Apartheid was established by the United Nations General Assembly in 1962, Western powers initially declined to join it or support its work. These powerful nations, mostly made up of former colonisers and their allies, argued that a boycott of the apartheid regime was not necessary.

It was left to Algeria, Costa Rica, Ghana, Guinea, Haiti, Hungary, Malaya, Nepal, Nigeria, the Philippines and Somalia to begin the committee’s work of reviewing the racial policies of the South African government, pressing for international sanctions and exposing the inhumanity of apartheid.

Five decades later, and the UN’s powerful Western nations are, again, protecting an apartheid regime.

A week ago, a report published by the UN’s Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA), found that “Israel has established an apartheid regime that dominates the Palestinian people as a whole”. For the first time, a UN agency found Israel guilty of practicing apartheid — as defined in the UN Apartheid Convention of 1973 — against the Palestinian people.

Defence of the Israeli apartheid regime was swift and forceful.
Israel’s UN envoy, Danny Danon, called the report an “attempt to smear” Israel. Nikki Haley, the United States ambassador to the UN, demanded that the report be withdrawn. That demand came just as the new Trump administration announced sweeping cuts in US contributions to the UN.

UN secretary general António Guterres had the report removed from the ESCWA website and told commission head, Rima Khalaf, to withdraw the report entirely. Khalaf stood by the report and resigned.

In her resignation letter, Khalaf noted that Guterres had instructed her to withdraw the report not because of its content but because of political pressure exerted on him by member states.

Israel’s defenders frequently claim that the UN ignores other human rights violators, yet condemns Israel’s treatment of the Palestinians. This was also the lament of apartheid South Africa’s propagandists, most notably the “Club of Ten”. The secret group, including then information department spin doctor Eschel Rhoodie, fertiliser king Louis Luyt and a former British judge took out full-page adverts in British and American newspapers in the 1970s decrying the UN’s “singling out” of apartheid South Africa.

The truth is that Israel is singled out, not in terms of unfair criticism but for unprecedented financial and diplomatic support, particularly from Western nations.

Many countries around the world face condemnation by the international community for breaching international norms but Israel is not one of them.

Syria has had its foreign assets frozen, Zimbabwe faces embargoes on international loans and arms imports, and the US and the European Union have imposed an array of sanctions on Russian individuals and businesses.

Israel commits war crimes and offends every principle of human rights and in return is rewarded with diplomatic immunity at the UN.

The ESCWA report comes at a time when Israel finds itself in a state of emergency reminiscent of South Africa in the 1980s. On March 6, Israel’s government passed a law barring the entry of foreigners who support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions Movement against Israel and its illegal settlements in the West Bank.

Like the South African apartheid government, the Israeli regime is embarking on a well-funded propaganda programme to burnish Israel’s image abroad. Israel offers fully funded study tours to politicians, student leaders and entrepreneurs. Free water technology serves to normalise an abnormal Israeli state.

South Africa’s history has taught us that these measures merely delayed the complete isolation of a pariah nation. Israel’s “South Africa moment” is fast approaching.

Last year, the Israeli tourism ministry gave 26 Oscar nominees a free luxury trip to Israel. Not a single star took up the offer. In February, eight of a 13-member delegation of American National Football League players cancelled their free trips to Israel after realising that they were being used to improve the country’s image abroad.

As the siege on Gaza tightens, settlement construction in the West Bank continues and Israel extends its occupation, former US president Barack Obama — once considered one of Israel’s most ardent defenders at the UN — described the result as “one state in which millions of people are disenfranchised and operate as second-class residents. You can’t even call them citizens.”

Israel, and its defenders, can no longer look away from the mirror that the world is turning towards them.

The Israel lobby and its powerful allies at the UN might have succeeded in getting the ESCWA report scrapped. But burying the report will not bury the reality it describes.

Suraya Dadoo is a researcher with Media Review Network, a Johannesburg-based advocacy group. Find her on Twitter @Suraya_Dadoo

Suraya Dadoo

Client Media Releases

Property mogul honoured at NWU graduation
Intelligence is central to digital businesses
One of SA's biggest education providers has a new name: Meet PSG's Optimi
A million requests, a million problems solved