Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

UK parliament plots Brexit Plan B after sidelining May

Britain’s parliament sought a new Brexit strategy Tuesday after seizing the initiative from Prime Minister Theresa May in a historic vote, with the risk of a chaotic “no-deal” departure looming.

Lawmakers exasperated by Britain’s failed efforts to find a way out of the European Union after three years of debates and negotiations voted Monday to give themselves a broader say on what happens next.

The motion creates parliamentary time for MPs to come up with their own Brexit proposals as Britain tries to stave off a messy divorce in two weeks.

The unprecedented measure passed by a 329-302 margin and saw three junior ministers quit the government to vote against the premier.

Richard Harrington said he resigned as business minister because May’s approach and the resulting impasse had left Britain with “a democratic deficit”.

Junior foreign minister Alistair Burt also quit, saying: “We have to come to a conclusion for the country’s sake”.

The Times newspaper said the vote left May “humiliated” and bracing for early national polls. The Financial Times agreed that Britain’s leader now “risked losing control of Brexit”.

Starting over 

The measure was backed primarily by pro-EU MPs who want to either reverse Brexit or preserve much closer economic relations with the remaining 27 EU states.

But no one is entirely clear about how parliament is going to approach its new role in the week the 46-year UK-EU partnership was scheduled to have to come to an end.

EU leaders pushed back Brexit day to April 12 after meeting May in Brussels last week and deciding that Britain still did not know what it wanted to do.

One of the co-sponsors of the measure to take over the Brexit process from May, Hilary Benn, said lawmakers would first probably get a range of options to choose from on Wednesday.

“The first time round it will just be ‘here are the propositions’ and you vote for as many as you would like,” Benn told BBC Radio.

“We may then change the system for next week as we are trying to narrow it down.”

The biggest worry for May is a mooted plan for parliament to then in the following days take an even firmer grip of the Brexit agenda by passing legislation that forces the government’s hand.

Parliament’s initial votes will be non-binding instructions that only carry political weight.

May has already signalled that she might ignore them if they contradict her Conservative party’s 2017 election platform.

It included a vow to take Britain out of the EU customs union and single market — the two vast organisations that open borders and regulate trade across most of the European continent.

But Burt said he resigned precisely because he felt that the “government should adopt any feasible outcome as its own in order to progress matters”.

Rethinking Brexit 

Parliament is now effectively reconsidering how to go about Brexit all over again.

Everything is back on the table and May’s deal — twice resoundingly rejected by lawmakers this year — is just one of a half-dozen or so approaches that may be up for debate.

May herself admitted “with great regret” Monday that there was “still not sufficient support in the House to bring back the deal for a third meaningful vote”.

Her efforts to bring onside anti-EU rebels in her own party have been fruitless despite months of talks.

But there are some hints that the current political shift could be scaring some of the rebels into line.

Brexit hardliner Jacob Rees-Mogg, head of the European Research Group of eurosceptics, said on Twitter: “The choice seems to be Mrs May’s deal or no Brexit”.

But the tiny Northern Irish party that supports her in parliament, DUP, continues to oppose the agreement and it remains unclear when — or even if — May will bring it back for a vote.

If parliament does beat the odds and adopt the deal, Britain would leave the EU on May 22.

Subscribe for R500/year

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them and get a 57% discount in your first year.

Dmitry Zaks
Dmitry Zaks
Politics and economics reporter with Agence France-Presse (AFP

Related stories


If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Subscribers only

Fears of violence persist a year after the murder of...

The court battle to stop coal mining in rural KwaZulu-Natal has heightened the sense of danger among environmental activists

Data shows EFF has lower negative sentiment online among voters...

The EFF has a stronger online presence than the ANC and Democratic Alliance

More top stories

South Africa must approach its energy transition pragmatically

A sensible climate policy must balance the imperative of decarbonisation, socioeconomic policy and security of supply considerations

Why handing over ICC suspects could help Sudan’s transition

A failed coup in September, weeks of brinkmanship, and a looming crisis in eastern Sudan have laid bare tensions between civilians and military leaders

Steel strike: Workers struck while the iron was hot

After almost three weeks, labour and employers have reached a deal — setting the steel industry back on its path to recovery

Phoenix activist takes on Durban’s politically connected in November polls

Independent candidates look set to play a greater role in the metro municipality after 1 November

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…