The brouhaha over the appointment of judges by the JSC has meant that a judgment of considerable importance has passed almost unnoticed.
Judge Nigel Willis is advised not to read further if he wishes to maintain his Friday good humour.
It appears that the Constitutional Court is divided between the customary and the constitutional when it comes to the Traditional Courts Bill.
Access to justice for all, particularly the impecunious, is a central requirement of the constitutional idea that animates our democracy.
When judges make key decisions, what fidelity do they owe to the normative framework of the Constitution?
For all the talk of the imperative of strict compliance with section 174(2) of the Constitution when it comes to gender only lip service is paid.
Last year ended with a flourish of judgments that tested the line between law and politics.
The past two weeks have focused attention on the failure of our political system to resolve political disputes and a consequent rush to litigation.
The Judicial Service Commission appears to have a consistent ability to be in the news for all the wrong reasons.
Mac Maharaj did his best to spin President Jacob Zuma’s withdrawal of his legal action against Jonathan Shapiro.