JSC disregards jurisprudential philosophy as a qualifying factor

Judging by his comment to the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) last week regarding this column Judge Nigel Willis is advised not to read further if he wishes to maintain his Friday good humour. Serjeant at the Bar raises two issues with regard to the judge:

  • In paragraph 28 of his judgment in Johannesburg Housing Corporation vs Unlawful Occupiers of Newtown Village, Willis wrote that in overruling an earlier eviction decision of his, the Constitutional Court had either not read all the evidence or possessed an inadequate understanding of the workings of motion proceedings in the high court.
  • In both that judgment and in paragraphs 26 to 28 in Emfuleni Local Municipality vs Mbalekelwa, Willis appears to argue that the market and not the state should ensure housing for the homeless, which runs counter to existing jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court and the express wording of the Constitution, which imposes a specific obligation on the state.

It is reasonable to think that these serious issues would have been raised with the judge by members of the commission when he applied for promotion to the Supreme Court of Appeal. But Willis ably deflected the initial question by complaining that this column was written by an anonymous panel and that was the end of the questioning.

There was no sustained interrogation of his views and their compatibility with the Constitution or of the propriety of a judge suggesting the highest court of the land was incompetent. It is surely a problem if in a judgment a judge articulates views that, if employed by a lay person, could be construed as contemptuous of the Constitutional Court.

The almost cavalier style of his interview has been contrasted with the long grilling of Judge Clive Plasket about transformation. Surely Willis's statements merited a similarly severe set of questions? By contrast, certain members of the JSC appeared to be critical of a judgment in which Plasket concurred, a case in which the JSC was a litigant. Not only is it a problem to assail a judge on a case one lost, but, whatever the merits thereof, he was doing his judicial job. The views expressed in Willis's judgments are far more ­unusual, but justified no questions.

Plasket joins a most distinguished group rejected by the JSC, as Izak Smuts SC reminded the nation in his compelling letter of resignation this past week. Talking to a number of senior lawyers, Serjeant gained the impression that the consensus view was that, although not quite in the same league as Geoff Budlender, Jeremy Gauntlett or Halton Cheadle, all of whom failed to be appointed, Plasket deserved promotion. He is regarded as a superior judge on all counts to Willis by lawyers who have appeared in front of both.


The JSC obviously disagrees. What the brouhaha throws into sharp relief is the question of whether the JSC regards a jurisprudential philosophy sourced in judgments or in the particular legal career of the applicant as of any importance. Further, does it have a conception of the broad kind of philosophy to be preferred? Unlike today, in its early years the JSC probed candidates about their views on the Constitution and how it could work to the advantage of millions of vulnerable South Africans.

The commission could respond to this criticism by arguing that judicial mavericks such as Willis play an important role in fostering debate and independence on the Bench. That is an argument that has serious weight, but it does not answer the key question: When faced with two candidates for one post and neither race nor gender is a factor, why is a lifelong commitment to ensuring that the poor can enforce rights together with a body of judgments that have a similar ambition not a cardinal consideration?

The debate should not focus on the comparative claims of two individual judges. They are more of a means by which to divine the criteria the commission employs to ascertain whether an appointment to judicial office will promote the core values of freedom, dignity and equality for all. To this important question, the JSC must urgently provide the public with a clear answer.

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Serjeant At The
Guest Author
Bar Author
Guest Author

Related stories

Hlophe says ‘assassination plot’ is a bid to sully his name

Allegations that Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe planned to assassinate his deputy, Patricia Goliath, are leading to further instability on the Cape bench

Judicial Conduct Committee finds prima facie gross misconduct by Judge Mushtak Parker

The committee says if two complaints against him are found to be true, they are “extremely serious”

Goliath’s secret recording of Hlophe raises questions of ethics

In an extraordinary move for a judge, the deputy judge president says she secretly recorded a meeting that proves she was insulted by Judge President John Hlophe

Western Cape Judge Mushtak Parker faces second misconduct complaint

The Cape Bar Council says his conduct is ‘unbecoming the holding of judicial office’

High court judicial row rumbles on

The Judicial Conduct Committee’s decision in the Hlophe vs Goliath matter means those judges at loggerheads will have to continue to work in one court

No impeachment tribunal for Hlophe or Goliath — yet

Judicial Conduct Committee decides on a different type of investigation into the gross misconduct complaints between the Western Cape judge president and his deputy
Advertising

Subscribers only

The shame of 40 000 missing education certificates

Graduates are being left in the lurch by a higher education department that is simply unable to deliver the crucial certificates proving their qualifications - in some cases dating back to 1992

The living nightmare of environmental activists who protest mine expansion

Last week Fikile Ntshangase was gunned down as activists fight mining company Tendele’s expansions. Community members tell the M&G about the ‘kill lists’ and the dread they live with every day

More top stories

‘Battle-tested’ vs ‘kind and fair’ — DA candidates’ last push...

John Steenhuisen and Mbali Ntuli both acknowledged the problems faced by the party over the past year, with each of them offering their own leadership vision.

A Landie icon is born

Replacing one of the most-loved cars in history, the new Defender pulls off the near impossible task of doing almost everything better

NSFW: The tricky business of OnlyFans

In an increasingly digital world, OnlyFans has given online creators a new way to make money on their own terms

Q&A Sessions: ‘Keeping quiet is not an option’ — Charlotte...

More than a decade after a brief stint on the opposition benches, Charlotte Lobe is helping to fly the South African flag as a senior public servant in the department of international relations and co-operation
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday