Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Zuma’s high court application is Stalingrad, season 27, NPA argues

Lawyers for the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) on Monday urged the Pietermaritzburg high court to dismiss both former president Jacob Zuma’s last-minute bid to have a hearing on his acquittal application in his arms deal trial postponed, as well as the application itself.

“This application is Stalingrad season 27,” advocate Wim Trengove, for the NPA, said of Zuma’s plea in terms of section 106 (1)(h) of the Criminal Procedure Act to have state prosecutor Billy Downer removed from the trial for lack of impartiality.

Zuma, who attended the hearing via video link from Estcourt prison, is arguing that, should he succeed in securing Downer’s removal, it should follow that he be acquitted by the court on arms-deal charges in terms of the section 106(4) of the same Act.

He has argued in court papers that the NPA as a whole lacks standing to prosecute the case, in which he faces corruption, fraud, theft and racketeering charges for allegedly taking bribes from French arms-manufacturer Thales. 

Trengove noted that in Porritt and Another vs the National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others, the courts accepted that if a prosecutor were removed, the NPA was allowed to appoint another to allow the trial to proceed.

By bringing the section 106(1)(h) application last month, Zuma is effectively staging a trial within a trial and seeking not only to cross-examine Downer but other figures he alleges politically conspired to manipulate his indictment.

But Trengove argued: “The NPA’s standing is beyond dispute.”

He described Zuma’s allegations of interference in the trial as a host of conspiracy theories debunked by capable courts, including in the former president’s failed bid for a permanent stay of prosecution. 

“We submit that it is an abuse to rerun the same complaints again, this time under the guise of section 106 (h),” he said.

Firstly, Trengove submitted, Zuma’s objection to the application being heard on Monday on the basis that he could not testify from prison was flawed, because he had given no indication of what evidence he could give against Downer. 

“So this is not a demand for Mr Zuma to go into the witness box … What he demands when he speaks of oral evidence is an opportunity to cross-examine Mr Downer and a variety of other state officials,” Trengove said.

“So it is a symptom of his recognition of his failure to make a case that he now resorts to a request for a referral to oral evidence. In the final analysis, this plea has got nothing to do with Mr Downer, but it is a demand that the court undertake an inquisitorial investigation of a conspiracy theory that has been thoroughly discredited, again and again and again.”

“That is the conspiracy theory on which the Mpshe decision was based,” he added, referring to the withdrawal of the charges in 2009, which paved the way for Zuma to become president. The charges were reinstated in 2018.

Advocate Dali Mpofu, for Zuma, objected that Trengove was arguing the merits of the application while the day’s sitting was meant to be confined to hearing the application for a postponement.

Trengove countered that to determine whether a postponement was necessary to allow Zuma to be present, one had to consider the merits of his request to testify in the section 106 application. He submitted that both applications were without merit and should be thrown out.

Zuma is arguing that his fair trial rights under section 35 of the constitution are being denied, and the provisions of the Criminal Procedures Act flouted, by the fact that Judge Piet Koen opted to hear the matter virtually, preventing the accused in a criminal trial from being present in court.

His lawyers filed the application for a postponement on Saturday.

The NPA supported Koen’s proposal to hear the matter virtually, given the level four Covid-19 lockdown currently in place, and a directive from the office of the chief justice in light of last week’s deadly unrest. Those people fomenting the violence have called for attacks on courts and judges.

Counsel for Zuma pleaded that a postponement of several weeks was necessary to ensure that he would be able to come to court, saying that although the violence linked to his imprisonment had abated, one could not guarantee that it would not flare up again in a week’s time.

When Koen asked if one week would suffice, advocate Thabani Masuku replied: “But what happens, for example, if next week there is another disturbance and we have to come back to you?

“I would suggest three weeks would be appropriate, My Lord.” 

Koen said he would deliver a ruling on the postponement application at 10am on Tuesday.

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Related stories


If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Subscribers only

Cape Flats gangsters, children die in fight over turf

Extortion rackets are part of a corrupt system that includes religious leaders, councillors, police and syndicates

Tobacco farmers want the taxman to do more to control...

The Black Tobacco Farmers’ Association the introduction of a minimum price level for cigarettes

More top stories

South Africa moves back to adjusted level 3, schools to...

Vaccination capacity to be increased as the government announces financial support measures for those affected by Covid-19 restrictions and the recent civil unrest

Water sector to clean up its act

The Blue and Green Drop programmes are being relaunched to rebuild SA’s often poorly maintained and ‘looted’ water systems

Afforestation can hinder fight against global warming if done wrong,...

A simplistic approach to tree restoration without not properly accounting for the complexities of plant and atmosphere interactions can cause problems

Carbon tax to align to UN treaties

Amendments to offset regulations published on 8 July give clarity on big emitters carrying old carbon credits to a new framework

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…