DA, AfriForum again reject health Act amendments ahead of minister’s briefing

Western Cape Premier Alan Winde on Wednesday reiterated that the Democratic Alliance rejected the government’s proposed amendments to the National Health Act, which are set to replace regulations that fell under the recently lifted national state of disaster

He said the DA had submitted its official objections.  

Health minister Joe Phaahla gazetted the proposed amendments on 15 March. They would allow the health minister to implement or terminate lockdown levels, restrictions and regulations outside of a national state of disaster. 

Phaahla and his deputy, Sibongiseni Dhlomo, are expected on Thursday to brief the parliamentary health portfolio committee on the progress made regarding the amendments. 

The Western Cape’s head of health, Keith Cloete, said the DA wanted “a very nuanced and specifically defined and targeted set of preventions based on evidence” that would not restrict movement and social activities.  

It should be the Ministerial Advisory Committee and evidence that guide any actions in response to future waves of Covid-19, Cloete added.  

The committee had advised the government in mid-February to abandon all lockdown regulations.

Civil rights organisation AfriForum has also objected to the draft regulations, saying they are “outside of the intended scope of the legislation”.   

“It was never the legislature’s intention for these Acts to have such far-reaching effects and consequences,” according to AfriForum.

“The government is attempting to pull the wool over our eyes by permanently enacting a supposedly temporary state of disaster measures. The draft regulations are clearly nothing less than a desperate attempt by the government to cling to the unbridled power afforded to it during the Covid-19 pandemic.”

Members of the public have until 15 April to comment on the proposed regulations. 

The Mail & Guardian recently reported that medical experts and political and economic analysts slammed the last extension to the Covid-19 state of disaster as a “power grab”, and an opportunity by the government to try to “push through” the contentious amendments. 

Shabir Madhi, the dean of the faculty of health sciences and professor of vaccinology at the University of the Witwatersrand, described the extension as one of “complete incompetence and an inability to understand where we are with Covid-19”. 

He said the move had resulted in “a perpetuation of regulations that are completely obsolete to the reality in regard to Covid-19”.

At the end of March, Madhi said the population had developed natural immunity because 70% to 80% of people had been exposed to the virus.

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Eunice Stoltz
Eunice Stoltz is a general news reporter at the Mail & Guardian.

Related stories


Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Latest stories

DRC: The war that doesn’t say its name

In the Democratic Republic of the Congo conflict, as well as peacemaking, have become ends in themselves, while the fighting is carried forward by its own momentum

The best booze and chocolate pairings

On World Chocolate Day on 7 July, experience chocolate like never before, paired with your favourite adult drink

Relief: Government must guard SA’s poor against inflation’s assault

It could prove difficult for government to loosen its grip on the public purse, but economists say the current extraordinary circumstances require intervention

Jesus wants to emulate boyhood hero Henry after sealing Arsenal...

The Brazil international revealed he was a big Arsenal fan as a youngster, having been captivated by Henry during the France star's successful spell in north London.

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…