”Sand is overrated,” murmurs Joel, the hero of this comedy, who’s goofed off work for the day to mope around the beach. ”It’s just … tiny little rocks.” That slacker epiphany could only have come from the pen of Charlie Kaufman, creator of Being John Malkovich and Adaptation, and one of the very few screenwriters in Hollywood whose authorial identity supersedes the director’s, in this case Michel Gondry.
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is suffused with Kaufman’s charm, his existential drollery, his humane affection for the lonely and vulnerable. It’s a very Kaufmanesque narrative experiment, technically ingenious and sophisticated. But it is also overcooked and frenetic, with some visual gimmicks repeated often enough to induce a diminishing return of novelty and effect.
As in Adaptation, Kaufman has a depressed creative guy experiencing a nagging anxiety about the meaning of life. Like Nicolas Cage in that film, he begins with a panicky, whispery voice-over about what the point of it all is, worrying away at his own discontents, which float meaninglessly out into the placidity of the universe. He is Joel (Jim Carrey): a semi-employed cartoonist and graphic artist. One day he bumps into a beautiful young woman with dyed hair. Clementine (Kate Winslet) is a beguiling force of nature and poor, introverted Joel falls hopelessly in love with her. But then we cut to another, calamitous stage in their relationship. After their affair has gone sour, Joel finds Clementine is blanking him when they meet; it’s as if they’ve never known each other.
Then he finds out the awful truth. Clementine has had him erased from her memory by an experimental hi-tech firm wittily called Lacuna, which, despite the sensational service it offers, operates out of a down-at-heel office. Here chief scientist Dr Mierzwiak (Tom Wilkinson) with his geeky assistants have painful memories lasered out of their unhappy clients’ grey matter, and in a rage Joel demands that they perform the same service on him to forget Clementine. But he finds that he is strangely reluctant to relinquish his memories of the woman he loved, no matter how painful.
It’s a theme that Kaufman extends with oodles of clever material. ”Will this procedure cause brain damage?” asks Joel as the helmet is lowered on to his skull. ”Technically,” says Mierzwiak gravely, ”this procedure is brain damage.”
Literary allusions rattle amiably around. The title is taken from Pope, and Mierzwiak’s staff are enamoured of Nietzsche’s paradoxes about how the strong man forgets what he cannot master: ”Blessed are the forgetful, for they get the better even of their blunders.” Mierzwiak’s secretary is called Mary Svevo, a surname which recalls Zeno’s Conscience, about a psychoanalyst who frustrates his patient’s need to abandon the past.
Moving on, getting closure, that is what the end of relationships is supposed to be all about. Not dwelling or brooding or obsessing about why someone fell out of love with you. In the absence of marriage for life, serial monogamy is what people expect, and so they must cultivate the art of forgetting if these transitions are to be managed. But oblivion offers peace at the cost of self-destruction, and Joel passionately feels that his unhappiness over Clem is part of his identity.
Gondry keeps a tight rein on Carrey, who gives one of his most digestible performances in ages. But the director always insists on an excess of surreality by pedantically realising visually every strange detail of Joel’s memory-angst. If he’s thinking about a book store while pacing about an apartment, we see the book store in the apartment. All very wacky and Dick Lester-ish, like a grad-school Beatles movie, and for about five minutes it’s funny and exhilarating. But it’s over-extended, and tends to undermine the rigorous realism that made the idea funny.
The resolution Kaufman offers reveals that, apart from everything else, there has been some playful jiggery-pokery in the time scheme and he follows this up with a further plot twist which, having appeared to restore Joel and Clementine’s happiness, puts it in peril once again.
It’s something which shows that for all his Lewis Carroll waywardness, there is something toughly real about this writer’s world-view. I just wish that some more tactful and less wired direction had been brought to his eccentric and delicate love story. — Â