The United States Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, who has so far survived mounting calls for his resignation over Iraq, is to be pitched into the centre of the American midterm election fight by Democrats who are convinced that he is the Bush administration’s Achilles heel.
Senior Democratic members of Congress say they will seek a no-confidence vote in Rumsfeld, who is under fire for a speech this week in which he compared opponents of the Iraq war to those who supported the appeasement of Adolf Hitler before World War II.
Rahm Emanuel, a high-profile member of the House of Representatives, plans to introduce the motion in the presence of 12 retired generals and other officers, who have lent the weight of their military experience to the campaign to force the defence secretary’s resignation.
Democratic senators are discussing a similar move. Such a vote could not compel Rumsfeld to quit, but it would be highly embarrassing to the governing party.
”Secretary Rumsfeld’s stewardship of this effort is a failure, and he has let down our armed forces,” Emanuel told The Washington Post.
The Democrats are mounting an attempt to seize control of Congress in November’s midterm elections by engaging the Republicans on their turf — national security and defence issues.
The strategy comes in response to a new effort by President George Bush and Rumsfeld to defend the administration’s foreign policy record. In a string of speeches this week the president has sought to bundle Iraq and Afghanistan with crises over Iran and Lebanon, describing current events as ”the decisive ideological struggle of the 21st century”.
It was as part of this initiative that Rumsfeld told a meeting of war veterans on Tuesday that the world faced ”a new type of fascism”, and that those who opposed the administration’s policies were suffering from ”moral confusion” and had ”still not learned history’s lessons”.
He renewed his attack in Friday’s Los Angeles Times, singling out Amnesty International for having called Guantánamo Bay ”the gulag of our times” even though it ”includes a volleyball court, basketball court, soccer field and library (the book most requested is Harry Potter)”.
Nancy Pelosi, the Senate minority leader, seized on the remarks. ”If Mr Rumsfeld is so concerned with comparisons to World War II, he should explain why our troops have now been fighting in Iraq longer than it took our forces to defeat the Nazis in Europe,” she said.
Rumsfeld has proved durable in office despite bearing the brunt of criticism for failures in Iraq, including the decision to deploy a relatively small number of troops, the disbanding of the Iraqi army, and torture at Abu Ghraib prison.
But the Republicans’ most influential campaign consultant, Frank Luntz, told The Guardian that Rumsfeld has become a ”weak link in an otherwise relatively strong Republican issue. The Democrats can’t win in the war on terror, but they do hold an advantage on Iraq”. Rumsfeld’s ”confidence and bravado were very much an asset in [the elections of] 2002 and 2004, but the American mindset has moved on”, Luntz said.
Joseph Cirincione, a national security expert at the left-leaning Centre for American Progress, said Democrats, who are maintaining clear leads in many pre-election polls, have good reason to be optimistic. ”The public has a much more radical position on the war in Iraq than the Democratic party has, and that gives the party some room to manoeuvre.”
But the Democrats must avoid making themselves vulnerable to Republican claims that they are playing politics with matters of grave importance — a risk that will be acute as Congress considers several important defence and national security Bills in the coming weeks.
In his own words
On intelligence: ”There are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns. That is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don’t know we don’t know.” — February 2002
On insecurity in Afghanistan: ”Because it’s reasonably democratic, it’s kind of untidy. And one looks at the untidiness and says, ‘Oh my goodness, it’s untidy.’ Well, my goodness, democracy is untidy. Freedom is untidy. Liberation is untidy.” — August 2002
On being defence secretary: ”Once in a while, I’m standing here, doing something. And I think: ‘What in the world am I doing here?’ It’s a big surprise.” — May 2001
— Guardian Unlimited Â