Is our media (still) racist?

If racism exists, it is certainly not for a lack of attempts to rid the media of the shackles of its apartheid history. Since democracy arrived in South Africa, the media industry has undergone some wide-ranging changes.

On the level of ownership and editorial changes, the industry has seen ownership of large media houses pass to black consortia and the appointment of black editors and journalists to previously white-dominated media institutions.

As far as professionalism is concerned, the system of self-regulation entered into in the democratic dispensation has attempted to ensure that media content is free of racist stereotyping. The Press Ombudsman’s code cautions the media to “avoid discriminatory or denigratory references to people’s race, colour, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation or preference, physical or mental disability or illness, or age”, unless it “is strictly relevant to the matter reported or adds significantly to readers’ understanding of that matter”. It also warns against hate speech, as does the Broadcasting Complaints Commission of South Africa’s code, based on the values enshrined in the Constitution.

So, after all these changes, do we still need to think about racism in the South African media? A recent report by the Media Monitoring Project (MMP), “Revealing Race”, suggests we do. It points out that “despite innumerable changes, juniorisation of newsrooms and a lack of skilled staff and adequate resources have resulted in an increase in the number of incidents of poor reporting in South African media”.

It says media “tend to lead with dramatic headlines that may sell more publications, but often trivialise the issues at stake and promote stereotypes and discrimination, which reinforces the alienation of specific groups of people”. The report found that coverage of racism and xenophobia often lacks analysis and context, and that “the other” is often still stereotyped. This “other” seems to increasingly be black foreign nationals.

As was pointed out by professor Guy Berger, this latest report raised much less furore than the one the MMP had been commissioned to do by the Human Rights Commission in 1999/2000. That report, marred by questionable methodology, indicated a media that was still deeply implicated in racism. The new report suggests some improvement, but criticises the media especially as far as crime reporting is concerned, for what it sees as racist assumptions about the perpetrators of crime (read the report at

Yet again one could ask questions about the MMP’s method, and how much is really revealed about racism in the South African media. By measuring only articles that mention race specifically (and over a relatively short period, but that is another issue), only the explicit manifestations of racism could be considered. Racism is a much more sly animal, and to spot it you need to look in more than one place.

An especially important aspect that has been neglected in both the MMP studies thus far is the intersection of race and class. The media industry might have transformed its ownership and editorial staff to reflect the demography of the country, but is it also representative of different classes in society. Because the mainstream media operates as a business, it obeys market logic, which means that it has a bias towards lucrative audiences.

Put simply, because the media sells audiences to advertisers, it has to sell news that those audiences are interested in. This would usually mean that, for instance, strike action will be covered from the perspective of business rather than from that of workers; events in urban centres will get preference before rural stories; lack of social delivery will be seen as a news story when there is a flare-up and roads are blocked but interest will wane when things return to the “normal” and the poor eke out their living far away from the glare of publicity.

What does this have to do with race?

South Africa is one of the most unequal countries in the world, and these inequalities still coincide largely with the racial divides of the apartheid past. For the media to contribute to a more non-racial society, it has to do more than avoid explicit racial stereotypes, racist hate speech or the linking of race with crime.

It has to dare to view the news from different perspectives, also giving the viewpoints of those sections of society whose voices are seldom heard because they are not an attractive market segment.

To some extent the much-reviled tabloids, while often guilty of xenophobia (and singled out in the MMP report), have managed to turn the media market upside down exactly because they see the country from the perspective of the majority of working class, poor readers who are mostly shunned from mainstream media.

Addressing racism from a structural point of view would also mean supporting initiatives to establish more community and local media that serve poorer communities and could operate according to different business models than do the commercial mainstream. In other words, where the MMP study set out to look for explicit mentions of race and racism, racism is often present precisely where race and ethnicity is not mentioned. Where news coverage presents the point of view of only a specific section of society yet does so under the pretext of innocently “holding up a mirror to society”; where certain economic policies are presented as common sense and contesting views are omitted or ignored; where crime, poverty and social decay are presented as the result of individual negligence (the phenomenon of “blaming the victim”) rather than that of systemic failure – in these cases race is part of the picture exactly because it is invisible.

Getting to grips with racism in the media needs a holistic approach, and not only one that deals with the overt manifestations of the phenomenon. A disease also lurks there where its symptoms are not clearly seen.

Herman Wasserman teaches Media, Communication and Cultural Studies at Newcastle University, UK and is Associate Professor Extraordinary of Journalism at Stellenbosch University.

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Herman Wasserman
Guest Author

Related stories

The Queen and I

Tony Blair's attack on the media in his last days in power seemed like a sharp U-turn. In his early days as prime minister, he was the one who urged the Queen to embrace the postmodern media culture where celebrities were the new royals, writes Herman Wasserman.

Don’t discount the SA dream

"South Africans went to the brink of full-out civil war in the 1980s, but decided to go shopping instead." This description of the transition to democracy -- by an unnamed Pan Africanist Congress cadre quoted by Graeme Addison in <i>The Media</i> magazine a while ago -- came to mind while watching SABC3's <i>Media Focus</i> two weeks ago. The programme featured a new SABMiller advert.

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday