G8 could see climate deal, but substance in doubt

Group of Eight (G8) leaders could well cobble together some agreement next week on goals to cut greenhouse gas emissions, but bolder progress in climate change talks will probably have to wait until a new United States president takes office.

Climate change is high on the agenda for the July 7 to 9 summit in Hokkaido, northern Japan, and is the focus of an expanded Major Economies Meeting (MEM) on July 9 that brings the G8 together with eight other countries including China, India and Brazil.

Japanese Prime Minister Yasuo Fukuda wants to boost momentum for United Nations-led talks on a new framework beyond limits agreed under the Kyoto Protocol, which expire in 2012. Those negotiations are due to conclude in Copenhagen in December next year.

An agreement by 2009 would give certainty to investors wanting to switch to cleaner energy technologies, as well as to participants in growing carbon markets.

The 71-year-old Japanese leader, whose ratings are languishing at about 25% on doubts about his leadership, also needs a successful summit to dampen speculation that his party will dump him when the diplomatic pageantry ends.

A general election must be held by late next year.

”The worst scenario is to have no agreement of any kind that the G8 and MEM can explain to the outside world. When leaders meet, you don’t do that,” Koji Tsuruoka, director general for global issues at Japan’s Foreign Ministry, said.

”If you come up with a very empty document that says nothing, this would be faulted as the chairperson’s lack of leadership, although it may not necessarily be the chairperson’s fault.”

Pre-summit haggling
G8 leaders agreed last year in Germany to seriously consider a global goal of halving greenhouse gas emissions by 2050.

Climate campaigners say this year’s summit should go further by endorsing that goal, compared with 1990 emissions levels, and linking it to bold and specific mid-term targets for developed countries.

But bickering among G8 members and between advanced and developing countries has raised doubts about how much the leaders can achieve next week.

”The G8 countries could certainly take a leadership stand and agree to that [a long-term goal], but I think that really depends on whether Bush is ready to take that leap or not,” said Jennifer Morgan, director for climate and energy security at Berlin-based think tank E3G. ”Up to this point in time, the US has shown no flexibility on this point.”

Europe wants the G8 to commit to a goal of halving by mid-century the emissions that cause global warming, compared with 1990 levels.

Japan is urging the leaders agree to a common vision of a 50% cut by mid-century, without specifying a base year.

The Bush administration, though, says it will only set targets if emerging economies such as China are on board.

Both Tokyo and Washington also insist specific interim goals for advanced countries to reduce their emissions by 2020 — seen by European countries, developing countries and environmentalists as a vital step — are not on the table in Hokkaido.

Seeking success
Despite the pre-summit haggling, world leaders’ traditional tendency to seek an outcome they can pitch to the public as success means a deal could yet emerge, diplomatic experts said.

”There will be some sort of agreement on a long-term goal,” said Kuniyuki Nishimura, research director at Mitsubishi Research Institute. ”It will be very diplomatic language, but they will agree and present it to the outside as success.”

Nishimura said he expected the G8 leaders to agree that the world should strive toward a goal of halving global emissions by 2050, while the rich countries also show their willingness to provide funds to help developing economies restrain growth in their own emissions and adapt to climate change.

Expectations of agreement on firm targets for developed countries to cut emissions by 25% to 40% by 2020 have faded since Fukuda ruled out such commitments last month, but the G8 is likely to acknowledge the need to set such targets soon.

MEM negotiators agreed last month that major developed countries should set mid-term goals while major developing countries should take steps toward curbing growth in emissions.

Still, with Washington’s climate stance expected to shift under a new president, environmentalists are already looking beyond Hokkaido. Democratic candidate Barack Obama and Republican Senator John McCain both want to introduce cap and trade systems for greenhouse gases as part of a goal of big cuts by 2050.

”I’m hopeful there will be a big sea change,” Morgan said. — Reuters

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Related stories


Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Latest stories

Hlophe accuses high court of trying to rewrite the law

The court deviated impermissibly from the constitution to sanctify the composition of the Judicial Service Commission when it found that he should face impeachment for gross misconduct, the Western Cape judge president argued in an application for leave to appeal

Boehly’s Chelsea takeover puts US tycoon in spotlight

The American has grand ambitions for the west London club as he targets sustained success on the pitch and financial growth off it.

‘Myths’ are keeping township residents from sterilising pets

The Mdzananda Animal Clinic in Khayelitsha wants to increase the number of pets getting sterilised to curb overpopulation.

We need to declare a state of emergency on policing

Never was the saying ‘Who will guard the guardians?’ more appropriate than at the present

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…