‘Humble scientist’ Turton extends olive branch

Suspended Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) scientist Dr Anthony Turton said on Wednesday he had extended an ”olive branch” to the organisation.

”I have no anger in my heart, I have no belligerence,” he said.

”I have no interest in pursuing this to a higher level: I just want to continue doing my work as a scientist.”

Turton was suspended last week after the CSIR ordered him not to deliver a hard-hitting presentation on South Africa’s water crisis at a CSIR conference in Pretoria.

His presentation included a plan to boost the number of scientists in the country and a new funding model for research.

The CSIR said however that some statements in the paper ”could not be sufficiently substantiated”.

It said it had launched an investigation after he ”elected to engage with the media on the matter of the withdrawal of his presentation … in contravention of organisational policy”.

Turton said on Wednesday he had obtained legal advice that he had an extremely strong case for claiming damages, but he had no desire to go to court.

He had sent the CSIR an email on Tuesday night, saying the body had attacked his credibility as a scientist through its comments on the contents of his paper.

”I told the CSIR that if this is the foundation of your charge, the technical contents of the paper, then there is no charge against me,” he said.

He had suggested they move back to a ”normalised situation” as quickly as possible, as the controversy was causing enormous harm to the organisation.

”I think it’s a reasonable [suggestion]. I’m not trying to escalate the thing, because it’s in nobody’s interest to escalate. I don’t like being in the limelight.”

Turton said it was not correct that he leaked his paper to the media in advance of the conference.

He had intended the paper to be a non-controversial consensus position, and for that reason had circulated it ahead of time to a wide range of scientists, NGOs and government departments.

It was one of these NGOs, not himself, who sent it to the media.

He said he was in any event an authorised media spokesperson for the CSIR on water issues, and had even undergone a CSIR course on dealing with the media.

Turton said the controversy was a distraction from the real issue: the dwindling science budget in South Africa, and the haemorrhaging of skills.

He was trying to put in place a programme that reversed this trend and set national strategic priorities. He said he got satisfaction from serving his country, and so did the other CSIR scientists he worked with.

”I still remain a humble scientist,” he said.

It was reported on Wednesday that civil society groups and NGOs have launched a petition calling for his immediate reinstatement.

CSIR spokesperson Christa van der Merwe said the organisation would not issue additional statements or comments at this stage, beyond the statement it put out last week confirming Turton’s suspension. – Sapa

An actual Black Friday deal

Subscribe for R2/mth for the first three months. Cancel anytime.

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.

Ben Maclennan
Guest Author

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Latest stories

The Covid-19 Omicron variant: What is known so far

As scientists scramble to learn more about it, infectious disease expert Professor Salim Abdool Karim says current vaccines are effective against the new variant

Black Friday better than 2020’s but consumer spending remains subdued

The momentous retail spending event, Black Friday, remains relevant in South Africa as total online spend year-on-year increased by 6%

Minister shakes up state housing entities in bid to improve...

Mmamoloko Kubayi-Ngubane appoints new boards because the structures were ‘wracked with infighting, rapid and frequent leadership changes, poor governance, corruption and loss of technical capacity’

High court allows Freedom Under Law to oppose Hlophe’s review...

The court found that the organisation’s past history in ensuring the misconduct inquiry against the Western Cape judge president was reopened refuted, rather than supported, Hlophe’s objections
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×