Chief justice ‘doing a bloody good job’

Justice Minister Jeff Radebe on Tuesday praised Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo for “doing a bloody good job” and said the government would oppose an expected legal challenge to the extension of his term.

“We believe Wits is wrong in fact and in law and we will resist any legal challenge from the Centre for Applied Legal Studies,” Radebe told a media briefing ahead of the justice budget vote in Parliament.

“We believe we are on solid legal ground.

“Judge Ngcobo, ever since 2009, has showed that the doubting Thomases were wrong. We believe he is the best chief justice around and he is doing a bloody good job.”

The Centre For Applied Legal Studies (Cals), which is based at the University of the Witwatersrand, said section 8(a) of the Judges’ Remuneration and Conditions of Employment Act was “unconstitutional and invalid”.


The provision was used last week by President Jacob Zuma to reappoint Ngcobo for another five years, but Cals claimed it violated the constitutional guarantee of judicial independence.

The issue was raised by several speakers in the justice budget debate, just after the briefing.

Democratic Alliance MP Dene Smuts said she had long supported the extension of Ngcobo’s term of office “because he will ensure the institutional independence and in time even the management of the courts”.

But she added that section 176(1) of the Constitution demands that it be done by an Act of Parliament, advancing the same argument as Cals.

“It is a pity that the Arthur Chaskalson Act has been used for this purpose and has now caused a challenge.”

‘Nothing has been done that is procedurally wrong’
African National Congress MP John Jeffery argued that section 176 was satisfied because by applying a provision of the Judges’ Remuneration and Conditions of Employment Act, passed in 2001, Zuma was acting in accordance with an Act of Parliament.

He said it was strange that those who raised the issue generally had no problem with Ngcobo but wanted to challenge his position because they disagreed with the process followed.

“I don’t know why we have to waste this money on litigation,” he said. “I don’t know why we have to damage the image of the chief justice as a person who was wrongly appointed. I hope that this matter does not become a matter that parties politic over and I hope that everybody will treat the chief justice with the respect he deserves.”

In his response to the debate, Radebe reiterated that “nothing has been done that is procedurally wrong”.

Constitutional law expert Pierre de Vos said it was true that Zuma had acted in accordance with the 2001 Act.

But he said the case would rest on whether section 8 of the law was constitutional, and there might be a strong argument that it was not because it sought to delegate a power given to Parliament by the Constitution, to the president.

“For Parliament to give the president a discretion may potentially affect the independence of the judiciary,” he said, adding that there may be “a reasonable apprehension” that a judge could seek to win the president’s favour if he or she wanted an extension of term.

Non-renewable term
At present section 176 limits the terms of Constitutional Court judges to a non-renewable term of between 12 and 15 years.

Zuma disclosed on Friday that Ngcobo would continue to serve as South Africa’s chief judge for the next five years. Zuma said that on August 15 this year, Ngcobo would have held office as a judge and Constitutional Court judge for a cumulative period of 15 years and three months.

Jeffery suggested that the matter of their length of service should eventually be settled by the Superior Courts Bill, which places the administration of courts under the chief justice.

In fact, an earlier version of the Constitutional Amendment Bill controversially proposed permanently appointing judges to the Constitutional Court, but this was removed from the latest version tabled in Parliament.

The provision was criticised for making it possible in theory to load the court with politically compliant judges.

The Bill still proposes making the Constitutional Court the apex court in all matters, and not just constitutional cases.

Smuts had said this was problematic because the judges currently serving at the court were not appointed with this function in mind. — Sapa

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Related stories

Seals abort pups in mass die-off

There are a number of factors — a pollutant, virus or bacteria or malnutrition — may have caused the 12 000 deaths on Namibia’s coast

Deconstructing South Africa’s construction industry performance

The construction industry has contracted sharply, partly due to Covid, and needs to rebalance its focus if it wants to survive

Editorial: SA will be bankrupted by looters

The chickens have finally come home to roost: if we do not end the looting, it will end us

Zuma vs Ramaphosa? Neither is the leader South Africans deserve

Neither statesman could command sufficient authority in an ANC that remains mired in corruption and infighting and at the behest of big capital

E-payments for the unbanked are booming

The pandemic is providing mobile phone network operators with a unique chance to partner with fintech firms and banks to deliver clever e-commerce solutions to the informal sector in Africa

Hate speech and LGBTI rights: perspectives from the Jon Qwelane case

South Africa has an obligation to prohibit hate speech under international law, including against LGBTI persons. But now the Constitutional Court has to decide whether the hate speech provision is constitutional
Advertising

Subscribers only

SAA bailout raises more questions

As the government continues to grapple with the troubles facing the airline, it would do well to keep on eye on the impending Denel implosion

ANC’s rogue deployees revealed

Despite 6 300 ANC cadres working in government, the party’s integrity committee has done little to deal with its accused members

More top stories

Finance probe into the Ingonyama Trust Board goes ahead

The threat of legal action from ITB chairperson Jerome Ngwenya fails to halt forensic audit ordered by the land reform minister

Ailing Far East Rand hospital purchases ‘vanity’ furniture

Dr Zacharia Mathaba, who purchased the furniture, is a suspected overtime fraudster and was appointed as Gauteng hospital chief executive despite facing serious disciplinary charges

Eusebius McKaiser: Reject the dichotomy of political horrors

Senekal shows us that we must make a stand against the loud voice of the populist EFF and racist rightwingers

Seals abort pups in mass die-off

There are a number of factors — a pollutant, virus or bacteria or malnutrition — may have caused the 12 000 deaths on Namibia’s coast
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday