DSK trial was of accuser, not accused

Maybe one day, in the pitiless light of hindsight, it will become clear why a woman’s false statements about her immigration status, made years ago, were deemed more pertinent to an accusation of attempted rape than the vaginal bruising she allegedly incurred during the encounter itself.

To be fair, it was not just that Nafissatou Diallo made false claims about her background that undermined her credibility to the point that, on Monday, the Manhattan district attorney decided to tell the judge to drop Diallo’s charges against former International Monetary Fund director Dominique Strauss-Kahn.

There were other factors and not just those proffered by Nixon speechwriter Ben Stein, who argued that economists don’t commit sex crimes, and, of course, the friend to all famous male victims of the American justice system, Bernard-Henri Levy. He insisted that “grand hotels” always send in “a cleaning brigade”.

Diallo has been shown to have told lies, certainly. None of them, though, had anything to do with her version of what happened in room 2806 in the Sofitel, a version that has been backed up by forensic evidence.

First, her lie about her immigration status was that she had been — gotcha! — gang-raped. But the reason she lied then was that she thought it would help her to gain political asylum. Her motivation for doing so now is decidedly less clear. The much-repeated story about her telling a friend on the phone that she was planning to defraud Strauss-Kahn has since been rubbished by her lawyer as a poor translation and anyway, her actions since suggest she is the world’s worst blackmailer. When she waived her right to anonymity, she not only gave the defence more material to mine for inconsistencies, but gained no money and risked — heck, guaranteed – damaging her personal reputation and employment prospects for life.


Moreover, she sure won’t be able to try that old rape-accusation trick on any other unsuspecting man. She didn’t think this plan through.

Her recall (under great emotional stress, whether she was lying or not) of the precise chronology of what happened precisely after the alleged assault altered slightly and that was offered up as further proof of her unreliability.

A French attorney said on Monday: “It’s not that he [the district attorney] doesn’t believe her, it’s that he doesn’t believe her to be a good victim. A woman who gets intoxicated can be raped. Prostitutes can be raped. And a poor woman who has told lies can be raped. In fact, it is often the women who don’t make good victims who are most at risk because they are the most vulnerable and it is these women who are least likely to be listened to.”

Diallo’s past proved to be more incriminating than Strauss-Kahn’s, a man with an infamously predatory reputation towards women and who has since been accused of another sexual assault by a French writer. In an interview with the Swiss magazine L’illustre, a former mistress of Strauss-Kahn said that Diallo’s description of how he grabbed her “encouraged me to believe this woman”. But all too often in rape cases the principle of presumption of innocence for the accused tips into assumption of guilt for the accuser.

Rape accusations — like abortions, or becoming a single mother — are not something most women do for a lark, squeezing them in between mani-pedis and Pilates or, in the case of Diallo, cleaning another man’s toilet. That Diallo lied about a rape in order to gain asylum in the United States where she has since been so humiliated by a sexual encounter is just one of the bitter ironies here. In spite of the efforts of the district attorney and Strauss-Kahn’s defence team, a trial most certainly did happen: it just happened to be a trial of the accuser rather than the accused. Strauss-Khan has denied the allegations and what occurred in room 2806 will never be known.

What has been proved, on an international scale, is that only women who have led lives as sheltered as Rapunzel and have memory recall as robotic as computers are capable of being raped. The rest are money-grabbing sluts with vaginal bruising. —

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Related stories

Advertising
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday