Shoot the boer: ‘That’s how a genocide can start’

A South African court on Monday ruled that ANC Youth League leader Julius Malema was guilty of hate speech for singing an apartheid-era song that advocated the killing the white farmers.

“I find the words uttered by Malema constitute hate speech,” said Judge Collin Lamont. Malema was ordered to pay court costs in the civil case that did not carry a criminal penalty.

The verdict against Malema, a vocal proponent for the nationalisation of mines, comes as he is fighting for his political survival in a separate disciplinary case brought by the African National Congress, which has charged him with bringing the party into disrepute.

The 30-year-old Malema, who is seen as a future leader of the ANC, was not present in court.

The case was brought to the South Gauteng High Court by the Afrikaner civil rights group AfriForum Youth, which claimed white farmers felt vulnerable because of the song “dubul’ ibhunu”, (“shoot the boer”).


Powerful weapons
In his judgment, Lamont said words were powerful weapons that could lead to disastrous actions and even genocide

“The words of one person inciting others … that’s how a genocide can start,” he said in his judgment.

Lamont said in determining the outcome of the case the court had to analyse the meaning of the words in the song and its effect on society.

He said single words and a group of words had “elastic meanings”. The words Malema sang had not been forgotten as they were derogatory and hurtful.

He said the response of the public was relevant to analyse the entirety of its context.

Genocide was defined as “the deliberate and systematic destruction” of an ethnic, religious, or national group”.

Lamont likened the songs by Malema as those sung by soldiers when they were at war.

“Soldiers in battle don’t treat the enemy as individuals but as a thing [a unit].”

Lamont said the difference was that soldiers were singing to celebrate.

A video of Malema singing the song was shown during his hearing.

“He executed rhythmic movement … making the shape of a firearm … and certain gestures were made,” said Lamont.

An armed person was one in power and one who intimidated, the court found.

Lamont noted that unfair discrimination remained rooted in certain structures of society.

Racial discrimination of one group or community over another could not be justified, and certain groups did not enjoy “superior status” over others in a democracy.

Since apartheid, transformation had been difficult for some in South Africa.

“Certain members [of the public] embrace the new society, others found it hard to adjust … it will continue for some time. There can be no transformation without pain,” said Lamont.

The court heard that the Constitution provided for equality, and the eradication of social and economic inequalities.

South Africa had international obligations under the United Nations for peace and unity including the elimination of all forms of racial discrimination, and discrimination against women.

Lamont traced South Africa’s history from the period before settlers started arriving in South Africa, through the years of white minority dominance.

He described it as a case of “social conflict” and launched into a long explanation on the context, background and history of the struggle against apartheid.

He asid certain aspects of the past may “never be fully reversed”, but reconciliation and national unity were meant to heal the divisions of the past.

The ANC consisted of the “suppressed majority” of apartheid.

Protection for minority groups
AfriForums’s spokesperson Ernst Roets told the Mail and Guardian he was “very excited about the judgment.”

Roets said he was pleased that Lamont has taken “deliberate effort to explain why he came to the conclusion he did and why certain groups feel alienated by the songs”.

He said the judgment would lead “to a protection of minority groups and would promote unity in the country”.

Roets said AfriForum was not worried that the judgment would increase Malema’s popularity as his supporters rallied around him. Roets said Afriforum felt “it did the right thing by taking the civil case to the Equality Court”.

He added that it had tried to resolve the issue with dialogue but when this failed, “it had no option but to go to court”. – Sapa, Reuters

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Agencies Author
Guest Author
Boyd Webb
Guest Author

Related stories

Advertising

Subscribers only

Cyril & co rise as Ace’s plot bombs

Magashule’s group and ANC outsiders have made moves to get the president and others to also stand aside

Q&A sessions: Where are the Zuckerbergs of South Africa?

Haroon Meer, the founder of the multimillion-dollar startup Thinkst, talks about international acclaim and South Africa’s need for more tech builders

More top stories

Mlambo invites commentary on claims of judicial capture, again

A candidate for the Northern Cape bench lucidly explained in reply to the Gauteng Judge President that bribing a judge is a lottery you are bound to lose

Funding bombshell leaves law students in limbo

Wits sent students notices stating that they were liable for tuition, allowance and accommodation costs for 2020. The bombshell was dropped on the students in the last week of March.

Alcohol lobby’s data is wobbly

A recent report by the alcohol industry contradicting established research and should be thoroughly questioned

Carbon dioxide, methane levels surge despite Covid-19 lockdowns

Carbon dioxide levels are now higher than at any time in past 3.6-million years
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…