Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

China’s ark is not big enough for the world

No question about it, the global economic situation is dire. The major economic entities, the United States and the European Union, are in the throes of self-inflicted, but apparently insoluble, problems as they lurch their way to stagnation and possibly global depression.

In the US, bizarre political configurations continue to prevent a real recovery. The Obama administration blew its chances in the first two years by failing to put in place a fiscal package that would create more jobs and generate positive multiplier effects in a sustainable way.

But now that it finally seems to have realised the necessity for at least some such measures, it is being impeded by the intransigence of Republican elected representatives, fuelled by Tea Party elements who demand a smaller state at any cost. So now the gaze is turned longingly to the east, in the hope that China and the rest of developing Asia will rise up to save the world economy.

This hope is being expressed in all sorts of ways. An early belief was that, since the global economy is now ‘multi-polar”, a decline in Europe and the US can be more than offset by expansion in China, India, Brazil and similar emerging markets. In particular, China, which is now the largest exporter in the world, is ­supposed to take up the slack and create an alternative growth engine for the world.

This is still mostly wishful thinking because, however much world economic power equations may have changed, they have still not changed enough to create that kind of possibility. Being an engine of growth requires generating import demand that can be met by the rest of the world. At present the US accounts for about 13% of global imports, and the EU for about 17%.

China, by contrast, provides only 9% of global import demand — and well above half of that is of raw materials and intermediate goods required for processing into exports.

Suppose imports from the EU and US together were to decline by, say, about 5% during the coming year — which is an increasingly likely possibility. Then Chinese imports would have to increase by nearly 15% simply to make up for that decline.

If we recognise that Chinese exports will also be affected by that decline, since the US and EU together account for 40% of these exports, then the required increase in other Chinese imports would be more of the order of between 20% and 25%. And this would only ensure the same level of world trade values, with no increase. This notion of delinking is no longer viable, given the strong and myriad connections that already bind major economies. But then maybe this deeper integration can be put to good account in other ways?

Financial saviour
Another role that is proposed for China in the continuing drama is that of financial saviour, buying up the sovereign bonds of peripheral European countries like Greece, Spain and Italy, and thereby ­reducing their financial exposure and preventing their default. Indeed, China’s sovereign wealth fund has already bought into such bonds.

Suppose China were to expend real firepower by spending a greater proportion of its reserves on buying these bonds. This might create ­temporary relief in the markets but it would do little other than delay the inevitable denouement. Recall that China bought shares of several ailing US banks in 2008, to little eventual effect. Chinese investment in European bonds is simply another straw being grasped at by politicians unwilling to face reality and the real changes in strategy that are required.

In any case, expecting China to save the world is also based on an unrealistic assessment of the state of the Chinese economy. The global slowdown is bringing out more clearly that the investment and export-led model that powered China’s growth for three decades is already out of date.

In fact, in the wake of the global crisis, the Chinese authorities sought to change this through a recovery led by a fiscal stimulus based on infrastructure investment and monetary stimulus based on easy credit, especially for housing.

The consequent housing bubble is now on the verge of being pricked, and a massive expansion of shadow banking means the Chinese financial system is more fragile and beyond the control of the state than at any time in the last half-century. A slowdown in exports in this context could have all sorts of undesirable effects on China’s economy, however strong it may seem now.

The solutions have to come from globally co-ordinated Keynesian policies for expansion, not external stimuli. So do not look to the Orient for gifts at this point. —

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Jayati Ghosh
Jayati Ghosh
Jayati Ghosh is one of the world's leading economists. She is professor of economics at Jawaharlal Nehru university, New Delhi, and the executive secretary of International Development Economics Associates (Ideas). She is a regular columnist for several Indian journals and newspapers, a member of the National Knowledge Commission advising the prime minister of India, and is closely involved with a range of progressive organisations and social movements. She is co-recipient of the International Labour Organisation's 2010 Decent Work Research prize

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Subscribers only

Life Esidimeni inquest postponed until August 30

The lawyer for the bereaved families argued that Dr Makgabo Manamela’s requests for postponements have a negative impact on the families of the deceased who seek closure

RECAP: Mbeki tells ANC that land without compensation goes against...

‘This would be a very serious disincentive to investment,’ says Thabo Mbeki in a document arguing that the ANC should not proceed with the Constitutional amendment of section 25

More top stories

SIU to investigate tenders between water and sanitation department and...

The president has signed a proclamation for the Special Investigating Unit to investigate R474-million in tenders

South Africa’s audit independence tops World Bank rankings

Only two countries received a perfect score in ​​latest report on national audit institutions

In South Africa, only 5% of chief executives are women

Only 5% of chief executives are women and the gender pay gap is most pronounced in the top JSE-listed companies, according to a PricewaterhouseCoopers...

How to apply for the Covid-19 R350 grant

Asylum seekers with valid permits and caregivers will now also be allowed to apply for the reinstituted social relief of distress grant
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×