Davos calls for clear laws against cybercrime

International action to snuff out cybercrime is desperately needed, officials and business leaders said, warning that criminals move at internet speed while countries drag their feet.

Many hackers are no longer just mischievous individuals.

Instead well-funded organisations do it for profit, along with spies and terrorists, but many governments are struggling to fight it.

“Many countries don’t have laws to criminalise cybercrime, they don’t have means and tools to investigate, to share information,” said Yury Fedotov, who heads the United Nations office on drugs and crime.

Cybercrime is “interconnected in terms of crime, but not interconnected in collaboration” against it, he added, noting that there is not even an agreement on what constitutes cybercrime.

Fedotov said his greatest wish would be “to get a clear definition of cybercrime — to be clear about what should be rejected by member states and what should be allowed.”

“Criminals move at the speed of internet and countries move at speed of democracy — that’s the discrepancy,” warned Moises Naim, senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

In one of the major recent attacks in January, a hacker brought down the websites of Israel’s national carrier El Al and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange.

It marked the latest incident in a series of attacks only days into 2012, which saw details of tens of thousands of Israeli credit cards posted online and websites defaced by hackers claiming to be from Saudi Arabia or Gaza.

Sami Abu Zuhri, a spokesperson for Gaza’s Hamas rulers, has hailed the action, describing it as “a sign of the Arab youth’s creativity in inventing new forms of Arab and Islamic resistance against the Israeli occupation”.

The Israeli market was not the only one subject to such attacks.

US exchange Nasdaq’s general counsellor Edward Knight told delegates in Davos that the world’s largest exchange company is also “subject to constant attacks, a million or more … intrusions into our systems”.

He complained that there is no clarity on “where is public responsibility and where is private responsibility” on clamping down on such crime.

Unlike real world attacks, the private sector is required to provide its own defence system, even if virtual attacks are coming from foreign governments.

Kevin Johnson, chief executive officer at the US-based internet infrastructure provider Juniper Networks, urged state authorities to work with private organisations to clamp down on such crime.

“The challenge is that the internet is a global resource but there are no geographic boundaries on the Internet, yet laws are established by nation states, they are establised by geography,” he said.

“One recommendation is any solution … is going to require a much higher degree of public, private partnership,” Johnson stressed. — AFP

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Latest stories

‘Justice for Marikana will only be served if we see...

The mineworker union’s Joseph Mathunjwa spoke at the ten-year anniversary of the massacre

US conduct regarding Taiwan evinces a dangerous and ignorant strain...

It underestimates the role of face-saving, which is central to Chinese culture, and the country’s priorities, such as attaining the Chinese Dream

Eskom: Stage two load-shedding tonight

Continued blackouts highly likely on Wednesday and Thursday, the energy entity added

MPs dismiss Mkhwebane’s call to subpoena Ramaphosa

The president’s evidence is not necessary to determine whether she is guilty of misconduct, the section 194 committee concludes
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×