Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

ANC policy papers show discontent with world bodies

The United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) must be reformed, according to an ANC discussion document on international relations.

“The current global governance regimes remain untransformed and ill-prepared to respond to the systemic challenges that are arising,” the ANC said in policy papers released on Monday.

“Therefore, the commitment to reform of the United Nations and the international finance institutions, especially the World Bank and the IMF, is also a matter of necessity.”

Justice and Constitutional Development Minister Jeff Radebe, who is also policy sub committee chairperson of the ANC’s national executive committee, told reporters that the discussion document explored the ANC’s role given the changing international balance of forces.

The document was among those that would form the basis for discussion at the ANC policy conference in July.

According to the document, global governance regimes, particularly the UN, had remained largely unchanged since 1945.

The UN Security Council should be transformed to reflect the current balance of power.

Change in leadership
“We reject the idea that five permanent members of the UN Security Council should hold sway over global decision-making and that the more democratically constituted General Assembly and its organs be reduced into a mere talk shop,” the ANC said.

It called for a change in the leadership of the IMF and World Bank.

“The disproportionate decision-making power the west also enjoys in the governance structures of both institutions ought to change.”

African representatives, however, would not necessarily improve the institutions.

“[I]t would be foolish, given our history and experience, to believe that African representation would automatically mean progressive agendas and programmes.”

The ANC suggested accountability mechanisms were necessary to ensure those deployed to these institutions furthered the African agenda.

It criticised the G20 — a group representing 20 major developing economies — for having become a “legitimising platform” for the G8 –the group of eight of the largest economies in the world.

“For this reason, we may have to recognise that the G20 is not yet [a] platform for fresh new thinking on global economic governance, nor should new approaches be expected to emerge out of it in the absence of pro-active strategic interventions by progressives.”

The ANC had to question what it had done to influence the G20’s agenda and whether it had legitimised failed ideologies.

The document examined South Africa’s role in Africa.

“We have resisted the call for us to take a hegemonic posture, which others have called a robust regional leadership that we lack.”

Therefore, the party had to “respond dynamically and with speed in defence of African renaissance”.

Western Europe and the United States had marginalised the African Union in the way they had dealt with the uprisings in North Africa and the Middle East.

However, the slow response of the African Union could not be excused, the ANC said.

“These developments pose a serious challenge for South Africa as a member on the UN Security Council dedicated to pushing an African agenda.”

The ANC called for the strengthening of African leadership and institutions.

“Unless something drastic is done to strengthen the institutions and leadership in Africa, its voice and choices will continue to diminish.

“Africa, being a fast growing economic and demographic region, will remain a magnet for competition between old and new powers over the continent’s rich natural resources.”

This called for the reinvigorating of continental and regional institutions like the AU, the New Partnership for Africa’s Development, the African Peer Review Mechanism and the Southern African Development Community. — Sapa

Subscribe for R500/year

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them and get a 57% discount in your first year.

Gillian Jones
Guest Author

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Subscribers only

‘The children cannot cope any more’: Suicide in Calvinia highlights...

How Covid-19 has intensified the physical and emotional burdens placed on children’s shoulders.

Capitec Bank flies high above Viceroy’s arrow

The bank took a knock after being labelled a loan shark by the short seller, but this has not stymied its growth

More top stories

The convenient myth of an Africa spared from Covid-19

There are few, if any, studies to support Pfizer chief executive’s assertion that the global south would be more vaccine-hesitant than the north

Council wants Hawks, SIU probe into BAT’s Zimbabwe scandal

The cigarette maker has been accused of giving up to $500 000 in bribes and spying on competitors

How Alpha Condé overthrew Alpha Condé

Since the coup d’état, Guinea’s head of state has been in the custody of the military officers. But it was the president who was the primary architect of his own downfall
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×