Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Ten things about defamation

1. Last week President Jacob Zuma dropped his four-year-old lawsuit against cartoonist Zapiro and Avusa Media, publisher of the Sunday Times, for Zapiro's cartoon in which he showed Zuma preparing to rape Lady Justice. Zuma had originally asked for R5-million in damages from Avusa and R1-million from then-editor Mondli Makhanya. The damages claim was reduced to R100 000 shortly before the court date arrived and then, on the eve of the case coming to court, the president withdrew it. He said he did not want to contribute to "limiting the public exercise of free speech".

2. The Law of South Africa dictionary defines defamation as a statement that "has the effect of injuring a plaintiff's reputation. A plaintiff's reputation is injured if the statement tends to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking members of society."

3. Furthermore, it does not matter if the statement is true or untrue: "The defamatory nature of a statement is not dependent on its falsity."

4. In the United States, someone suing on the grounds of libel has to prove the statement is untrue and caused harm. In the case of celebrities, malice has to be proved as well.

5. Under the British Libel Act of 1843, you could defend a charge of libel if the statement was true and if publication of it was in the public interest.

6. Defamation law, including slander (a common-law offence, usually spoken) and libel (published), developed in Britain in the 1600s at a time when the publication of vicious political and religious tracts was a burgeoning industry.

7. Zuma initiated 14 claims for defamation against the media, including suits against The Star (R1million), 94.7 Highveld Stereo (R7million) and Rapport (R5-million). Rapport, which had published a reader's letter lambasting Zuma, settled out of court; the rumoured amount was R50 000.

8. Media lawyer Dario Milo told Polity: "The majority of [Zuma's] claims, which total over R50-million, are not about news stories that the president regards as inaccurate, but rather concern criticism of his conduct."

9. It is now possible to libel someone on Twitter. Rock star Courtney Love was sued by fashion designer Dawn Simorangkir in 2009 after Love besmirched her name in a tweet. The designer settled last year for $340 000. Love's lawyers had argued that "Twitter was so appealing and addictive for Love that she had no appreciation for how the comments she posted would be received by others."

10. One extremely odd defamation case was Google being found guilty in France of defaming a man who had previously been jailed for corrupting a minor: when he did a Google search, the auto-suggest app immediately added the terms "rape", "rapist" and "prison". Google said the suggestions were automated, but was still ordered to pay the plaintiff about R50 000 in damages.

Vote for an informed choice

We’re dropping the paywall this week so that everyone can access all our stories for free, and get the information they need in the run up to the local government elections. For the latest updates and political analysis, sign up to our daily elections newsletter.

If our coverage helps inform your decision, cast your vote for an informed public and join our subscriber community. Right now, a full year’s access is just R510, half the usual cost. Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.

Related stories


Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Latest stories

Elections 2021: Where will fed-up voters make their mark?

Trust in big political parties is dwindling but that’s not necessarily a win for everybody else

Climate crisis causes meltdown of Africa’s three mountain glaciers

Mount Kenya, Mount Kilimanjaro and the Rwenzori mountains are all retreating faster than the global mean

The bins get emptied ahead of voting day, but will...

The Tembisa 10 may be a figment of somebody’s imagination, but Eskom’s Misery Twins are not

Local government elections: Why it’s rational to vote with your...

Voting tactically may seem like a realistic, mature option, but it compromises the integrity of your vote and is corrosive to the long-term health of democracy

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…