HIV cure? Not really, say experts

News that a baby in the US was effectively cured of HIV following aggressive therapy consisting of three different drugs shortly after birth generated great excitement on Monday. But paediatric HIV specialists warned on Monday that it was too early to say whether the treatment would have the same effect in other children.

Details of the case were revealed on Sunday at the Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections in Atlanta. Doctors said that while the child still carried the virus, it was no longer replicating. As a result, the child was healthy, did not need treatment and was believed to be unlikely to be infectious to others.

The case is exceptional because the child was started on treatment within 30 hours of birth. This is not normally the case, even in developed countries such as the US. In South Africa, babies are only tested for HIV after six weeks. If they are found to be HIV positive, they then get put on to treatment.

But paediatric HIV specialist Harry Moultrie said he was not convinced that doctors would be able to replicate the treatment in other children.

"Even if this is shown to be a functional cure, I'm not convinced if you did this to every child it would have the same result," he said.

He added that it was too early to speak of an HIV cure. "It's a little early to make huge generalisations," he said.

Moultrie said that while the case was both interesting and important, more information was needed before doctors could draw conclusions about how to treat babies who are infected with HIV at birth.

'Proof of a concept'
Ashraf Coovadia, a specialist in paediatric HIV at Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, agreed that it was too early to consider replicating the treatment in other babies suspected of having HIV.

"What the public needs to know first of all is that this is one case," he said. "It's proof of a concept. Further research needs to be done."

Coovadia urged parents not to assume that this case meant that an HIV-positive child could stop their treatment.

"The excitement might mean parents think that if their child started treatment when they were a few months old they can now stop. We urge people not to stop [their child's] treatment. It would be detrimental to the child's health," he said.

Coovadia said HIV specialists were not advocating any widescale change in the management of HIV-positive children in response to the paper. 

"We know this is a very exceptional circumstance. If parents have any doubts about their child's status they must discuss it with a paediatric HIV specialist," he said.

The case raised questions about how soon children born to HIV-positive mothers could be started on treatment and what sort of treatment would work best to prevent HIV from progressing in babies.

The first message
But, Coovadia said, prevention is still more effective than cure.

"Even if we put every child on treatment within the first 30 hours [of birth], there's no question there will be some kids who will get infected anyway," he said. 

"Those children infected in the mother's womb, early in the pregnancy, will not be assisted by this, therefore the [prevention of mother to child transmission] has to be our first message that goes out."

HIV-positive women who receive antiretroviral therapy during pregnancy can reduce the chances of passing the virus on to their babies to less than 5%.

The uptake of services to prevent the transmission of HIV from mother to child is relatively high in South Africa, with more than 98% of women getting tested for HIV during pregnancy and 91% receiving antiretroviral treatment or prophylaxis. But there were still about 10 000 babies born HIV positive last year.

Government is set to announce new treatment guidelines for the prevention of mother to child transmission of the HI-virus in April.

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Faranaaz Parker
Faranaaz Parker is a reporter for the Mail & Guardian. She writes on everything from pop science to public health, and believes South Africa needs carbon taxes and more raging feminists. When she isn't instagramming pictures of her toddler or obsessively checking her Twitter, she plays third-person shooters on Xbox Live.

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Latest stories

Africa, is your time now?

The Windybrow Arts Centre in Joburg has a variety of performances for Africa Month

Nurses could track domestic violence from stomach pains and headaches

The government had a plan to build domestic violence care into clinic services more than two decades ago but nothing ever came of it. Researcher Lisa Vetten argues it’s not too late to bring the long forgotten project back to life

Sabotage and corruption at Eskom’s worst power plant goes unpunished

A forensic report details how Tutuka power station is being crippled by current and former employees

Acid mine water continues to rise underground on the East...

Levels at a treatment plant in Springs have now breached a critical environmental threshold
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×