Nadal’s humility triumphs in the face of defeat

Few players handle defeat with the dignity or perspective Rafael Nadal brings to that morale-crushing experience. If there was triumph to be extracted from losing in straight sets to Steve Darcis, a 29-year-old Belgian with a big serve, a love of the grass-court game and more self-belief than might be expected of a player ranked 135th in the world, the Spaniard found it.

His refusal under persistent questioning on Monday night to blame the injury on his left knee that seemed to hamper him towards the end of their first-round match – and that put him out of the game for seven months after his loss to Lukas Rosol in the second round of Wimbledon last year – was no surprise to those who have witnessed him handle setbacks in the past.

That Rosol went out in five sets on Monday lent Nadal's situation further piquancy. The man who beat the man was gone, too; so how good was the man?

Good enough to reach five finals at Wimbledon and win two of them, he reminded his inquisitors. Indeed, so profound is Nadal's humility, he can make those looking for darkness that is not there seem to be heartless opportunists. He lost a tennis match. His opponent played better than him. And, no, he would not talk about his knee. That would be disrespectful to the winner.

This is the code of the locker room. Some abide by it, some pretend to and others are shameless. Nevertheless, from a more objective vantage point, it was clear Nadal's left knee was giving up on him towards the end of a match in which Darcis cleverly moved him along the baseline, risking the reprisal of that killer cross-court forehand, and drew him towards the net – normally a place he is not only comfortable with but lethal in. Not on Monday.

Even before a slight limp struck him down at the end, Nadal struggled to get his feet moving properly over the slippery surface. Darcis, who came to Wimbledon with four grass-court matches behind him and was unencumbered by bad knees, moved with more certainty. His conviction grew with each rally won, each point accrued. He surfed a tide of confidence all the way to the finish to win 7-6, 7-6, 6-4. It took him five minutes short of three hours, long for a three-setter and proof of what a battle it was. Darcis might never have a bigger day. 

Phenomenal return
As to how many Nadal has left, that was never a cause for speculation during his phenomenal return to the game over the past few months, when he amassed 43 wins in 45 matches, winning seven of the nine finals he reached. One defeat – albeit a seismic shock to the experts, the tournament and, most likely, Darcis – precipitated the murmurs.

And they are worth listening to, because his response to inquiries about his immediate and medium-term future left a big enough void to encourage speculation that he might take a little rest. As much as driven athletes such as Nadal, Andy Murray, Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer crave victory like a drug, subconsciously they have to be ready to accept what lesser players go through on a more regular basis.

As Nadal said in Paris, before winning his eighth French Open title, not to have doubts is arrogant. And there was a sense of genuine surprise, bordering on disbelief, elsewhere. Nobody had predicted this.

"Obviously surprising," was Murray's verdict. "But that's sport. Darcis beat [Tomas] Berdych in the Olympics and likes the grass. He's a talented player. People haven't expected this the past few years, because Rafa and Roger have been so consistent in the slams, but it happens. There are no easy matches."

Darcis, ecstatic but measured, said: "If you start to focus on him, it's tough. It's already tough. 

"I tried to focus on myself I think I did well today. I always played good on grass, maybe not here. I have two wins here against top 10 on grass, Berdych in the Olympics, and now Nadal."

Nadal's first loss
Yet the numbing reality of the result was laid out later in the statistics: this was Nadal's first loss in the first round of a slam; Darcis is the lowest-ranked player to beat him at any event since Joachim Johansson, when he was rated 690th in the world at Stockholm seven years ago; the last reigning French champion to lose in the first round here was Gustavo Kuerten, in 1997; Nadal has come back twice from two sets down at Wimbledon – against Robert Kendrick in the second round in 2006 and Mikhail Youzhny in the fourth round the following year. Yesterday, he could not do it.

Tennis, like all sport, can shock. Usually, it does no more than that. The following day, the numbness fades. The memory does too, more quickly for the loser, of course. It is all wonderful, innocent theatre, another slice of life, but, as Nadal reminds us: "At the end, is not a tragedy. Is sport." – © Guardian News & Media 2013

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Kevin Mitchell
Kevin Mitchell works from Dublin. I am a neurogeneticist interested in the genetics of brain wiring and its contribution to variation in human faculties. Author of INNATE (2018). Kevin Mitchell has over 20805 followers on Twitter.

Related stories


Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Latest stories

Chile’s lithium a poisoned chalice

It provides profit to billionaires but exhausts the land and its people

World Lion Day: Five young lions rescued in Romania arrive...

The country’s captive lion population of 9 000 is three times the size of the wild lion population.

Marikana lawsuits to be finalised by end of August

The state has already paid out R170-million in claims following the August 2012 massacre

Keeping it surreal: The game in Spain is mainly insane

Just when you thought the Spanish off season couldn’t get any weirder, Lewandowski and his costly colleagues might be left in lavish limbo

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…