Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Shuttleworth wins some, loses some in court

The North Gauteng High Court on Thursday dismissed Shuttleworth's application to strike down the whole of section 9 of the Currency and Exchange Act and all of the Exchange Control Regulations as unconstitutional.

Judge Francis Legodi dismissed Shuttleworth's application to set aside the imposition of a R250-million levy he had to pay to get some of his assets out of the country in 2009 and for the Reserve Bank to return his money.

The court also dismissed his application to declare invalid the Reserve Bank's policy of not dealing directly with members of the public but insisting that they should communicate through bank dealers.

The judge however granted an order declaring section 9(3) of the Currency and Exchanges Act as well as certain portions of the Exchange Control Regulations unconstitutional. Section 9(3) gives the President not only the power to amend or suspend any part of the Currency and Exchanges Act, but also the power to amend or suspend any other Act of Parliament.

Judge Legodi said this was an extraordinary wide power and effectively vested in the president the power to amend or suspend any Act of Parliament irrespective of whether that other piece of legislation dealt with currency, banking or exchange.

"This provision has the potential to unravel the healing wounds of the past when laws were changed at the stroke of a pen by one individual.

"This can never again happen in a constitutional and democratic South Africa.

'A programme of liberalisation'
" … Clearly no president in the living Supreme Law of the land [the Constitution] can ever wish to act as it is envisaged in section 9(3).

"This does not even need a programme of liberalisation of the system of exchange controls as envisaged by the minister of finance," he said.

Shuttleworth, who now lives on the Isle of Man, has blamed the existing system of exchange control in South Africa for "forcing" him to emigrate from South Africa in 2001. He had assets worth over R4.27-billion in South Africa when he emigrated, but transferred the assets out of the country in 2008 and 2009, each time subject to the payment of a 10% "exit charge".

Government abandoned the levy a year after Shuttleworth moved the remainder of his assets out of the country.

Judge Legodi ruled that Shuttleworth had not proved that his constitutional right to lawful, reasonable and procedurally fair administrative action had been infringed or that the Reserve Bank's so-called "closed door policy" was unfair. He said the object of the 10% "exit charge" was to limit the adverse consequences of the outflow of funds on the external balance of payments necessary to maintain South Africa's macro-economic health and to promote financial growth and stability.

"The idea of such discouragement cannot be said to be bad and an unconstitutional policy. " …Imagine what will happen to this country if the wealthiest men and women … were allowed to take their wealth out of the country with impunity every time when the country is in economic grief or when there is a change of government or leaders in the government.

"It could have a devastating effect on the country as a whole," he said.

No discrection
He ruled that the decision to charge the levy had been made by the minister of finance and that the Reserve Bank had no discretion to exempt anyone from it.

Shuttleworth had chosen not to attack the minister's decision, and the court could therefore not make a final determination on the issue, he added.

Judge Legodi dismissed Shuttleworth's contention that the exchange control process was unconstitutional because it lacked fixed guidelines, saying the system required a flexible, speedy and expert approach to ensure that proper financial governance prevailed.

He ruled that certain portions of the Exchange Control Regulations were unconstitutional, including the blanket prohibition on any transactions involving foreign currency, gold or other assets readily convertible into foreign currency, because it prohibited the right to free trade.

Regulation 3(1) C, which prohibits paying a person residing outside the Republic – making most modern-day internet transactions illegal – was also struck down, as was the section forcing one to disclose the nature of the goods one wished to purchase when one obtained permission.

The court gave government 12 months to amend certain sections of the regulations. – Sapa

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Sapa
Guest Author

Related stories

Advertising

Subscribers only

GDP, recession, JSE, rallying rand … these terms mean very...

The economy is not producing work, with many young adults working outside their fields of study or considering leaving the country as a result

More top stories

Learners moving to other provinces puts education departments under pressure

Gauteng and the Western Cape struggle to put children in class, but Limpopo and the Eastern Cape are closing schools as enrolment plummets

New membership system encounters problems in ANC branches

The Lower South Coast region has complained of a plot by some branch secretaries to manipulate the system

Police analyst implicated in R600k fraud scheme

But the forensic analyst has also claimed to be a victim of identity fraud

Economy’s signs of life mean little for the poor

GDP growth may be encouraging but it doesn’t mean much for SA’s millions of unemployed
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×