Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Anti-Semitism claim ‘inflammatory’

The South African Jewish Board of Deputies (SAJBD) has distanced itself from comments by former Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman that the South African government is creating an anti-Semitic atmosphere, which will result in pogroms against the country's Jews.

Lieberman was responding to recent comments made by South Africa's international relations minister, Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, about the country's relationship with Israel.

Speaking at trade union federation Cosatu's international relations committee meeting last Friday, Nkoana-Mashabane said that the South African government had agreed to "slow down and curtail senior leadership contact" with the Israeli "regime" until "things begin to look better". She also said that South African ministers currently did not visit Israel.

Responding to her comments on his Facebook page, Lieberman, who was Israel's foreign minister from 2009 to 2012, urged South African Jews to move to Israel immediately "before it is too late".

"The South African government is creating an anti-Israel and anti-Semitic atmosphere, which will result in pogroms against the country's Jews," he said.

But the SAJBD said these comments were unfounded.

"While we find minister Mashabane's comments misguided, we do not believe that this in any way will exacerbate anti-Semitic sentiment in South Africa," it said in a statement.  "Avigdor Lieberman's suggestion that this might lead to pogroms in South Africa is alarmist and inflammatory."

<strong>Unnecessary paranoia</strong>
Mary Kluk, the chairperson of the SAJBD, said that anti-Semitism in the South African context rarely went beyond verbal abuse. "Levels of anti-Semitic activity in South Africa have been shown over many years to be significantly lower than in other parts of the diaspora. Depicting it [South Africa] as a hotbed of anti-Semitism serves only to whip up emotions and stir up unnecessary paranoia and resentment."

Michael Freeman, the deputy head of mission at the Israeli Embassy in South Africa, said he was disappointed by Nkoana-Mashabane's comments.

"We find the statements she made odd. They don't match the messages sent to us at the embassy via her staff. Our interaction with the South African government in general has been very positive.

"The minister's comments are disappointing. A one-sided message hurts South Africa as it totally misses the message that Israelis and Palestinians are sending to each other by sitting down and directly negotiating."

However, Clayson Monyela, the deputy director general of public diplomacy at the department of international relations and co-operation, said that while South Africa supported brokering a just resolution to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, political and diplomatic interaction between South Africa and Israel was "limited, mainly due to Israel's antagonistic attitude towards the Middle East peace process and disregard for international law regarding the rights of the Palestinians and their territories".  

"South Africa and Israel enjoy full, albeit at present cool, bilateral relations because of Israel's continued intransigence concerning its obligations in terms of the Middle East peace process," he said.

"South Africa stands firmly opposed to the blockade of Gaza, its inaccessibility with respect to humanitarian aid, and the general dire humanitarian situation that this occupation has caused. South Africa also encourages a just solution with respect to the right of return of Palestinian refugees."

<strong>Settlement expansion</strong>
He said the South African government was also concerned about Israeli settlement expansion.

"The South African government has called on Israel on various occasions to abandon all settlement ­activity.

"A two-state solution to the conflict is under increasing threat as Israeli settlement activity in the West Bank continues to make the separation of both peoples into two states increasingly difficult."

Meanwhile, the Trauma Centre for Survivors of Violence and Torture has announced the termination of its relationship with multinational security company G4S, following a Boycott Divestment and Sanctions movement of South Africa campaign calling on South Africans to join an international boycott of the security company, which has also been accused of mismanaging the Mangaung prison in Bloemfontein.

In a statement explaining its decision, the centre's board members said they were concerned about "serious allegations" levelled against G4S of "complicity in the illegal incarceration and torture of Palestinians in Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories".

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Related stories


If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Subscribers only

‘Exciting’ ramp-up for Covid jabs

As more vaccines arrive in the country, South Africa could administer 420 000 doses a day

Mokgoro was party to talks of his resignation

The North West premier has defied the interim provincial committee’s decision

More top stories

‘Exciting’ ramp-up for Covid jabs

As more vaccines arrive in the country, South Africa could administer 420 000 doses a day

Mokgoro was party to talks of his resignation

The North West premier has defied the interim provincial committee’s decision

Richard Calland: Cyril’s wicked cabinet conundrum

Three weeks ago, a second term for the president seemed a safe bet, but the insurgency has thrown the puzzle pieces in the air

ConCourt finds that protection of LGBT+ rights was intrinsic to...

The court also found that the term hurtful should be excised from the Equality Act in that it did not meet the justification threshold in the Constitution and gave Parliament 24 months to do so

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…