SA appeal court to rule on Zim torture case

South Africa's Supreme Court of Appeal is expected to rule on Wednesday on South Africa's obligation under international law to probe alleged atrocities by officials in Zimbabwe.

"This case is the first of its kind to be brought before the South African courts and will set an important precedent," Southern Africa Litigation Centre deputy director Priti Patel said in a statement on Tuesday.

"The judgment will provide content to the obligations South Africa assumed under international and domestic law to ensure that the world's worst criminals are held accountable for their actions."

On November 1, a full Bench heard there was no suggestion from any party that the South Africa Police Service (SAPS) should investigate alleged crimes against humanity on Zimbabwean soil.

"Do an investigation here," Advocate Wim Trengove, for the centre, said at the time.

The court was hearing argument in an appeal against a decision that South Africa was obliged under international law to probe alleged atrocities by officials in Zimbabwe.

Masterminding crimes
The lower court held that the National Prosecuting Authority could prosecute the Zimbabweans concerned if they ever set foot in South Africa.

Zimbabwean officials are accused of masterminding crimes against humanity by instituting a state-sanctioned reign of terror in their own country.

Trengove said that even if it was later found the victims might have lied, the police could not refuse an investigation, "but they [the police] must investigate first".

Trengove said there would be no need to go on if the investigation proved to be futile.

"Until they exclude the prospects that these people would not come to South Africa, they cannot stop investigating the matter."

He said the contention that a crime became a crime only when the perpetrator entered South Africa was wrong.

Earlier, police spokesperson Andre Ferreira , said they could investigate a person allegedly involved in a crime only when that person set foot in the country.

He argued that to spend resources on an investigation where there were no prospects of a prosecution, such as if a foreigner might enter the country, would be wrong because it would lead to nothing.

He contended that only strict presence in South Africa was the trigger for an investigation and not an anticipated presence, as argued by the opposing side.

The original court action was brought by the centre and the Zimbabwean Exiles Forum.

They asked the high court to review and set aside a decision by the National Director of Public Prosecutions and the police not to investigate Zimbabwean officials allegedly linked to torture.

The high court found in their favour and the police appealed to the appeal court. – Sapa

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Guest Author

Related stories


Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Latest stories

Hlophe goes to court to prevent his suspension

He argues in court papers that the JSC’s advice to the president to suspend him is a violation of the Superior Courts Act

South Africa’s murder rate up 11.5% in the first quarter...

In the same period 9 516 rape cases were opened with the South African Police Service

Has activism won? Jay Naidoo reflects on the loss of...

From the early frontier wars against colonialism to the struggle against apartheid and in recent times the fight for economic equality, the culture of activism has evolved. But can it still be effective in bringing about change?

Finding justice 10 years after the Marikana massacre

The family of one of the victims of the shooting has received neither money nor an apology

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…