Basson guilty of professional misconduct

Apartheid-era chemical warfare expert Dr Wouter Basson – who was not present for the judgment in his six-year hearing before the Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) – was found guilty of misconduct on Wednesday.

The hearing, initiated by the HPCSA, was held at the organisation's offices in Pretoria.

Jaap Cilliers SC, for Basson, presented closing arguments in November.

The inquiry found that Basson acted unethically in the exercise of his duties as a chemical warfare expert.

He is accused of acting unethically by being involved in the large-scale production of Mandrax, cocaine and teargas, of weaponising teargas, and of supplying it to Angola's Unita leader Jonas Savimbi. He is also accused of acting unethically by providing disorientating substances for cross-border kidnappings, and by making cyanide capsules available for distribution to operatives for use in committing suicide.

Basson not present
On Friday, the HPCSA professional conduct committee received a letter informing it Basson would not be able to attend, chairperson Professor Jannie Hugo said earlier on Wednesday.

According to Basson's counsel, he attended a medical conference overseas and there was confusion over flight bookings.

Cilliers said Basson could be excused from proceedings and that a copy of the judgment would be sent to him.

The committee opened proceedings on Wednesday by observing a moment's silence for former president Nelson Mandela, who died at his home in Johannesburg on December 5, aged 95.

Basson, a cardiologist, was the project officer of Project Coast, a secret biological and chemical warfare research project which violated international protocols and conventions, in the 1980s and early 1990s.

Basson acquitted
In 2002, Basson was acquitted by the high court in Pretoria of criminal charges arising from his conduct.

The state appealed against this decision in the Supreme Court of Appeal, but the appeal was dismissed.

The state then went to the Constitutional Court, but the case was dismissed in September 2005.

The HPCSA then reviewed the judgment to establish if there were grounds to continue with an inquiry.  – Sapa

We make it make sense

If this story helped you navigate your world, subscribe to the M&G today for just R30 for the first three months

Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.”

Sapa
Guest Author

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Latest stories

Spaza shops take centre stage in township economy

Consumers living in such areas are spending more at spazas than big retailers, according to a report

PODCAST| Monkeypox: How it spreads, when to test and why...

The smallpox vaccine provides 85% protection against infection with monkeypox, but South Africa stopped vaccinating people against smallpox in 1980

Nike x Jacquemus collab: What to expect

The Nike x Jacquemus collaboration drops on Tuesday 28 June online. So far, no ludicrously tiny handbags in sight, but luxurious feminine twists on activewear that make this the collection you didn’t know you needed

Test cricket is dead, but not for the eager Proteas

Even before the demise of this format of the game was predicted, the women’s team had little opportunity to experience and enjoy it
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×