Khampepe report: The state likes its herrings red

In its heads of argument, and in another attempt to avoid handing over the Khampepe Report into the 2002 Zimbabwe elections, the state appears to have submitted a red herring argument.

It probably will not hold up.

On September 4, the Mail & Guardian and the presidency will meet at the Supreme Court of Appeal in Bloemfontein. The appeal court will hear the next round of arguments about whether or not to make public a report compiled by Constitutional Court justices Sisi Khampepe and Dikgang Moseneke into the fairness of the 2002 election in Zimbabwe.

The state is appealing a judgment by the high court in Pretoria, written by Judge Joseph Raulinga, that the report should be handed over to the M&G in the public interest.

That was the fourth court to hear the matter and agree that the state was not entitled to keep the report from being released.


But earlier this year, the Khampepe report went missing from judge Raulinga’s office

It was around this time that the state filed its heads of argument, relying heavily on the idea that the report was missing, and that this should render the case of the M&G null and void.

Report recovered and duplicated
The state argued in papers that the appeal court could not reasonably compel the state to hand over the report if it was no longer in existence. This was because Raulinga’s judgment was not technically unenforceable.

The argument was more a side issue than a central pillar of the state’s case, and now that the report has been recovered, it is a moot point.

But the M&G understands that the state has made no attempt to file supplementary affidavits to adjust its arguments, although its lawyers will be allowed to do so in person on September 4.

The report is now under lock and key. But before it was found, the president of the appeal court, Lex Mpati, prompted by lawyers for the M&G, asked the original authors of the report to send a copy to the appeal court for safekeeping.

So two copies now exist – one is held at Raulinga’s chambers, the other at Mpati’s chambers.

But the state could theoretically bring up a second argument, this time regarding the legitimacy of the report, according to sources close to the case. It is possible that the state could try to argue that the two reports might not be identical, and that they should first be compared to ensure their authenticity.

‘Confidentiality’ and ‘diplomacy’
This would further delay the case, setting off another trial-within-a-trial that would not deal with the substantive merits.

Without the argument that the report does not exist, or that the second copy is not legitimate, the state bases its appeal on two grounds:

First, the state says that Raulinga was wrong when he denied former president Thabo Mbeki and President Jacob Zuma leave to submit two supplementary affidavits, on the eve of the high court hearing.

“We submit not [Raulinga did not err], and that the case ends here,” lawyers for the M&G retorted in their papers.

The second argument is a legal one – does the public interest in the fairness of those elections override the provisions in law that allow the state to keep secrets in the interest of good governance and diplomacy?

On September 4, the state is likely to resurrect the argument that the report will damage South Africa’s relationship with Zimbabwe and that “diplomats” – Khampepe and Moseneke in this context – are entitled to confidentiality.

But lawyers for the M&G disagree, given that no court to date has agreed with the state on that point.

“The president has demonstrated no material respect in which the high court erred,” the M&G‘s lawyers said. “The appeal should be dismissed, with costs, including the costs of two counsel.”

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Sarah Evans
Sarah Evans

Sarah Evans interned at the Diamond Fields Advertiser in Kimberley for three years before completing an internship at the Mail & Guardian Centre for Investigative Journalism (amaBhungane). She went on to work as a Mail & Guardian news reporter with areas of interest including crime, law, governance and the nexus between business and politics. 

Related stories

ConCourt settles the law on the public protector and interim interdicts

The Constitutional Court said it welcomed robust debate but criticised the populist rhetoric in the battle between Busisiwe Mkhwebane and Minister Pravin Gordhan

Kasrils says he warned ANC about factions using spooks

The report, released on Saturday by President Cyril Ramaphosa, details how the intelligence services were used to advance Jacob Zuma's interests

Ramaphosa announces special SIU tribunal to fast-track recovery of state funds

​President Ramaphosa has established a Special Investigating Unit Special Tribunal, in an effort to fast track the recovery of funds lost to the state

City of CT to act against security company, #ReclaimClifton protesters

Beach-goers were told to leave Clifton beach by PPA guards last Sunday, two days before Christmas

Elections set for May, final registration weekend in January — IEC

The 2019 elections will take place in May 8, 15, 22, or 29 while the final voter registration weekend is set for the end of January, the IEC says

EFF denies AfriForum asset forfeiture claims

On Sunday, AfriForum said it had obtained a warrant from the high court to seize the moveable assets of EFF CIC Julius Malema and his party
Advertising

New education policy on gender violence released

Universities and other higher education institutions have to develop ways of preventing or dealing with rape and other damaging behaviour

Cambridge Food Jozini: Pandemic or not, the price-gouging continues

The Competition Commission has fined Cambridge Food Jozini for hiking the price of its maize meal during April

Sekhukhune’s five-year battle for water back in court

The residents of five villages are calling for the district municipal manager to be arrested

Vaccine trial results due in December

If successful, it will then have to be manufactured and distributed
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday