Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

​Pupils’ 20% pass reflects crisis in maths teaching

COMMENT
Many South Africans were outraged by the recent announcement that, for 2016, pupils in grades 7 to 9 could progress to the next grade having achieved only 20% in maths.

The minimum has been 40%, provided that all other requirements for promotion are met. Pupils with less than 30% in maths in grade  9 must take maths literacy (this involves what the department of basic education calls “the use of elementary mathematical content” and is not the same as maths) as a matric subject.

Public concern is understandable. South Africans should be deeply worried about the state of maths teaching and learning. The country was placed second last for maths achievement in the latest Trends in International Maths and Science Study.

Research closer to home has shown that pupils, particularly from poorer and under-resourced schools, are under-performing in maths relative to the curriculum outcomes. These deficits compound over time, which makes it increasingly difficult to address learning difficulties in maths in the higher grades.

All of this means pupils may be in maths classes but they are not learning. The answer to this problem does not lie with making pupils repeat an entire grade because of poor mathematical performance.

Grade repetition is practised worldwide despite there being very little evidence for its effectiveness.

In fact, it can be argued that its consequences are mainly negative for repeating pupils. Grade repetition is a predictor of early school leaving.

Pupils who repeat grades and move out of their age cohort become disaffected with school. They disengage from learning and drop out of school.

Repeating a grade lowers motivation towards learning and is seldom associated with improved learning outcomes.

Grade repetition is also an equity issue. The Social Survey-CALS (2010) report found that black children are more likely to repeat grades than their white or Indian peers. This reflects the fracture lines that signal socioeconomic disadvantage in South Africa.

Repetition rates decrease as the education level of the household head increases. Poor access to infrastructural resources, such as piped water and flush toilets, are associated with higher rates of grade repetition. Boys are more likely to repeat than girls. There’s also an uncertain link between pupil achievement and grade repetition, particularly for black learners in high schools.

So why does grade repetition persist?

A recent survey of 95 teachers in Johannesburg showed how teachers believe the additional time spent in a repeated year allows pupils to “catch up” and be better prepared for the subsequent grade. This view is reflected in recent reports that teachers are against the new 20% concession that has stirred so much controversy. Their opposition is echoed by callers to talk shows, who assume that repeating subject content results in improved understanding.

But unless the reasons for a pupil’s misunderstanding of concepts are identified and addressed, any improvement is unlikely. Given that the deficits in mathematical understanding may stretch back to the foundation phase (grades one to three), it’s doubtful that merely repeating a grade in the senior phase is going to be sufficient for remediation. Furthermore, research conducted in South Africa reveals that teachers lack confidence in their ability to teach pupils who experience learning difficulties.

The department of basic education’s 20% concession indicates it knows grade repetition won’t achieve much.

Poor achievement in mathematics is not going to be solved by making pupils repeat their grade. Repetition effectively makes pupils and their families pay an additional — financial and emotional — cost for the system’s failure.

The public outcry should not be that these learners are being given a “free pass” and don’t deserve to be promoted. Instead, civil society must hold the government accountable for the crisis in maths teaching. —theconversation.com

Elizabeth Walton is an associate professor in inclusive education at the Wits School of Education.

The Conversation

Subscribe for R500/year

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them and get a 57% discount in your first year.

Related stories

WELCOME TO YOUR M&G

If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here

Advertising

Subscribers only

Fears of violence persist a year after the murder of...

The court battle to stop coal mining in rural KwaZulu-Natal has heightened the sense of danger among environmental activists

Data shows EFF has lower negative sentiment online among voters...

The EFF has a stronger online presence than the ANC and Democratic Alliance

More top stories

Kenya’s beach boys fall into sex tourism, trafficking

In the face of their families’ poverty, young men, persuaded by the prospect of wealth or education, travel to Europe with their older female sponsors only to be trafficked for sex

High court reinstates Umgeni Water board

The high court has ruled that the dissolution of the water entity’s board by Minister Lindiwe Sisulu was unfair and unprocedural

Mkhize throws the book at the Special Investigating Unit

It’s a long shot at political redemption for the former health minister and, more pressingly, a bid to avert criminal charges
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×