Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Press ombud hate speech ruling on HuffPost SA set aside

The Press Council of South Africa has set aside a hate speech ruling made by press ombudsman Johan Retief on a blog post published by the Huffington Post SA, which called for white men to be disenfranchised.

Former HuffPost SA editor-in-chief Verashni Pillay appealed the ruling in May 2017.

The blog, titled “Could it be time to deny white men the franchise?”, ignited controversy after it was revealed the author had used a pseudonym, Shelley Garland. It argued for white men to be denied their vote in determining future leaders in South Africa.

AfriForum lodged a complaint against the blog with the press ombud, who then ruled that it constitutes hate speech.

But the appeals panel of the press council, headed by Judge Bernard Ngoepe, has overturned the ruling. “It could well be that the piece irritated or annoyed some people; but to classify it as a hate speech would be too huge a jump,” the Appeals Panel said in its ruling.

In her appeal, Pillay criticised Retief’s ruling because, she argued, it failed to specifically state which aspects of the blog were discriminatory. She said the ombudsman failed to identify which references to people’s statuses were “discriminatory and denigratory” in the context of the blog and “whether such references were “strictly relevant” and made “in the public interest”.

Because the blog also mentions different groups such as “whites”, “males” and “white males”, she argued that the ombud did not specify exactly which remarks were being scrutinised.

She added that the blog did not incite hatred of white men,but rather “depicts them as disproportionately powerful, economically and politically, and as historically having used that power at the expense of other groups”.

AfriForum was the respondent in the appeal, while Media Monitoring Africa (MMA) and the South African National Editors’ Forum (Sanef) joined as amici curiae to make submissions.

Retief, in his ruling, said the blog violated section 5 of the Press Code, which deals with discrimination and hate speech.

The press council said article 5.2 of the Press Code refers to hate speech and discrimination as “material that amounts to … incitement of imminent violence, or advocacy of hatred that is based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion and that constitutes incitement to harm”.

Ngoepe found that for the content to be declared hate speech it must incite both hatred and harm. He found the blog did neither.

“To amount to hate speech, what is said should not only advocate hatred, but also be an incitement to cause harm. Both elements must exist. The test for the likely effect of the words is an objective one; that is, how an ordinary reasonable or intelligent reader would understand the words. In our view, the piece complained about does not pass the test,” Ngoepe said in his ruling.

He agreed with arguments presented by MMA and Sanef, which said the blog was not inflammatory. Instead, Ngoepe described it as “faux academic”.

It also couldn’t be ascribed as hate speech, Ngoepe said, because the blog’s argument wouldn’t succeed.

“Secondly, it is hard to see it causing white men being disenfranchised. That, in any case, would be constitutionally impossible in this country, given the immutable constitutional principles,” Ngoepe said in the ruling.

Pillay, who was editor of the Mail & Guardian before moving to HuffPost SA, resigned from the publication after the blog was published. HuffPost SA removed the blog from its website and issued an apology at the time. 

Vote for an informed choice

We’re dropping the paywall this week so that everyone can access all our stories for free, and get the information they need in the run up to the local government elections. For the latest updates and political analysis, sign up to our daily elections newsletter.

If our coverage helps inform your decision, cast your vote for an informed public and join our subscriber community. Right now, a full year’s access is just R510, half the usual cost. Subscribers get access to all our best journalism, subscriber-only newsletters, events and a weekly cryptic crossword.

Raeesa Pather
Raeesa Pather
Ra’eesa Pather is a Cape Town-based general news and features journalist.

Related stories


Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Latest stories

The bins get emptied ahead of voting day, but will...

The Tembisa 10 may be a figment of somebody’s imagination, but Eskom’s Misery Twins are not

Local government elections: Why it’s rational to vote with your...

Voting tactically may seem like a realistic, mature option, but it compromises the integrity of your vote and is corrosive to the long-term health of democracy

SA proposes new climate finance target ahead of COP26

Long-standing issues on climate finance will make or break COP26, says environment, forestry and fisheries minister

Local government elections: Port Edwards’ residents rely on ‘holy’ water...

The Ugu district municipality has, for years, failed to provide a constant source of clean water and parties are pitching their elections campaigns around the crisis

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…