Optimum loses a round in high court battle to save its ‘damaged’ reputation

Handing over a list of reported suspicious transactions by the Gupta family and its companies was a clerical and not an administrative action, the high court in Johannesburg said this week, in what could be a crippling blow for Optimum Coal’s bid to rescue its reputedly damaged reputation.

The ruling was made in a preliminary skirmish in a case by Optimum Coal to review what it considered an unlawful action by the Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) — giving former finance minister Pravin Gordhan a certificate listing 72 suspicious transactions reported to the centre. 

Administrative decisions can be reviewed and set aside by a court, but a clerical recording of facts (such as the one by the FIC) may not have the kind of effect on people’s rights that would require a court to get involved. 

Gordhan annexed the FIC certificate to his failed application asking the high court to declare that he had no power to intervene in the relationship between the Gupta family and their bankers, so putting it in the public domain.

There it “attracted media attention, implying that [Optimum] had been involved in dodgy or suspicious transactions”, the Eskom supplier told the court in a heads of argument by its counsel, Mike Hellens.


But, on Wednesday, Judge Margie Victor dismissed that interlocutory application with costs.

“On a proper application of the law to the facts in this case, it becomes abundantly clear that the director [of the FIC] in issuing the certificate … was really involved in a clerical task at that stage,” said Victor. It did not amount to an administrative action, nor was there anything “irrational in that act that brings this matter under the purview of review under the principle of legality”, she said.

The FIC had argued that the certificate it had issued was similar to a tax clearance certificate issued by the South African Revenue Service — a simple reflection of facts.

“No right has been violated by certifying the fact that Optimum is the subject of several STRs [suspicious transaction reports] filed by persons with a suspicion that its transactions were unlawful with the FIC,” wrote the centre’s advocate, Michelle le Roux, in the FIC’s heads of argument.

“That is simply a fact. Optimum has engaged in transactions that gave rise to such suspicions. It cannot dispute this reality.”

If Optimum felt maligned, it should have targeted the people “with intimate knowledge” of its finances who thought they were seeing transactions that could include the proceeds of crime, the FIC said.

The centre “merely received those reports and confirmed that fact in a certificate”.

Victor said that, although Optimum was taking action because of the reputational harm it said it suffered when the certificate was published, the Guptas’ Oakbay group had already made public statements about their bank accounts being closed because of suspicious transactions.

She also said the legislation in terms of which the FIC operates provides for it to issue certificates to be used in court cases, which is exactly what Gordhan had asked for.

The certificate provided by the FIC listed 72 transactions, totalling about R6.8‑billion over four years, which had been reported to it in terms of rules intended to combat money laundering and financing terrorism.

The certificate listed only the date, assigned reference number, value and the “subjects reported”. Those included the “Optimum Mine Rehabilitation Trust”. The ring-fenced fund was intended to undo the damage caused by mining after operations end. The value of the trust transaction was recorded at R1.34‑billion.

Information obtained from leaked emails, among other sources, have suggested that mine rehabilitation funds were used to fund the Gupta family and its associates in their purchase of the Optimum mines.

Interlocutory applications are not usually open to appeal but can be appealed if their effect is final — such as ending any chance of a successful review application. Should Optimum contend it cannot proceed with its main application because of Wednesday’s decision, that decision could be open to appeal.

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Phillip De Wet
Guest Author

Related stories

SAA 2.0 hopes to start lean and grow from next year

Draft agreement document spells out that R1.5-billion will be needed to fund severance packages for 2 400 of the airline’s employees

ConCourt settles the law on the public protector and interim interdicts

The Constitutional Court said it welcomed robust debate but criticised the populist rhetoric in the battle between Busisiwe Mkhwebane and Minister Pravin Gordhan

For whom the Bell tolls

The cautionary tale of Bell Pottinger reminds us of the role of journalism in a democracy and why we owe it to ourselves to be more responsible about the media we consume

Sell assets or create a new airline? Tussle over SAA future intensifies

The department of public enterprises is concerned that the proposed sale of assets threatens its plans to engineer SAA 2.0

‘SAA 2.0’: New deal provides a lifeline

Airline brought back from the brink as rescue practitioners and Gordhan agree to work on a rescue plan by the end of June

SAA crash-lands but new airline will take off

During discussions between unions and business rescue practitioners and the government, it was decided that the national carrier would be closed and a new airline formed
Advertising

New education policy on gender violence released

Universities and other higher education institutions have to develop ways of preventing or dealing with rape and other damaging behaviour

Cambridge Food Jozini: Pandemic or not, the price-gouging continues

The Competition Commission has fined Cambridge Food Jozini for hiking the price of its maize meal during April

Sekhukhune’s five-year battle for water back in court

The residents of five villages are calling for the district municipal manager to be arrested

Vaccine trial results due in December

If successful, it will then have to be manufactured and distributed
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday