Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Ombud okays media naming high-profile, probable gender-harm perpetrators

In a precedent-setting case, press ombud Johan Retief this week created a new set of rules under which the media may, under certain conditions, name alleged perpetrators of gender-based harm.

The rules amount to an ethical checklist that, if followed, will allow publications to avoid censure from the ombud for doing so.

“If these conditions are not met, the media are not at liberty to identify an alleged perpetrator,” Retief cautioned.

Previously, those accused of such violence were not named unless and until they had pleaded on criminal charges, except in extraordinary circumstances.

The new ethics rules apply only to the press ombud process, and do not affect defamation rules under which publications could still be sued by named alleged perpetrators.

Retief created the precedent in ruling on a complaint by Lwandile Fikeni, a prominent arts journalist at the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) against university newspaper Wits Vuvuzela.

The publication had named Fikeni in an article that reported allegations by two named women who said he had physically and emotionally abused them. Fikeni said Wits Vuvuzela should withdraw the article or remove his name from its report.

In its answer to the complaint Wits Vuvuzela pointed to the social obstacles women face in stepping forward with such allegations, and said Fikeni’s prominence made the matter of public interest.

The paper also cited two articles published in the Mail & Guardian this month on the ethical considerations in such cases.

In one, Rhodes academic Anthea Garman argued that the criminal justice system’s failure of victims of gender-based harm meant the mindful naming of perpetrators by the media could be justified. In the other, Webber Wentzel media lawyer Okyerebea Ampofo-Anti said a legal restriction on naming such perpetrators only comes into force once the perpetrator is formally charged with a crime, and expires once the accused has pleaded.

Fikeni has not been charged.

“The naming of alleged sexual offenders and their identification by the media are very much in the fore of late — not only in South Africa, but also internationally,” said Retief on why a clear precedent was required.

Retief rejected the assertion that alleged perpetrators named on social media (as Fikeni was) could then be named by the media, under rules that hold the re-reporting of defamation to constitute defamation in itself.

He likewise rejected the idea that the media need to verify allegations beyond a reasonable doubt before publishing them.

The result is three requirements, all of which must be met before a person can ethically be named a perpetrator.

  • The public interest must outweigh the interest of the alleged perpetrator. “This would depend on the profile the accused has in public — the higher, the greater public interest would be,” Retief said.
  • The media must believe the allegation to be probably true, although it need not be true beyond a reasonable doubt.
  • The allegation must be verified if possible. The more accusers there are, and the more detailed their accounts of alleged abuse, the more justified naming the alleged perpetrator would be, Retief said.

There is no requirement for accusers themselves to be named.

Based on these considerations, Retief dismissed Fikeni’s complaint.

The new rules will stand as precedent unless overturned or amended by the Press Appeals Panel, or the Press Council amends the Press Code to deal with the issue.

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Phillip De Wet
Guest Author

Related stories


If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Subscribers only

R270m ‘housing heist’ bid deprives people of decent homes

After alleged attempts to loot Eastern Cape housing funds, 39 200 people in the province will continue to live in atrocious conditions

Cabinet reshuffle not on cards yet

There are calls for the president to act against ministers said to be responsible for the state’s slow response to the unrest, but his hands are tied

More top stories

R270m ‘housing heist’ bid deprives people of decent homes

After alleged attempts to loot Eastern Cape housing funds, 39 200 people in the province will continue to live in atrocious conditions

Stolen ammo poses security threat amid failure to protect high-risk...

A Durban depot container with 1.5-million rounds of ammunition may have been targeted, as others in the vicinity were left untouched, say security sources

Sierra Leoneans want a share of mining profits, or they...

The arrival of a Chinese gold mining company in Kono, a diamond-rich district in the east of Sierra Leone, had a devastating impact on the local community, cutting its water supply and threatening farmers’ livelihoods – and their attempts to seek justice have been frustrated at every turn

IEC to ask the courts to postpone local elections

The chairperson of the Electoral Commission of South Africa said the Moseneke inquiry found that the elections would not be free and fair if held in October

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…