KZN amakhosi enraged over ANC land reform bid

KwaZulu-Natal’s traditional leaders appear to be on a collision course with the ANC about the governing party’s decision to dissolve the Ingonyama Trust, which controls three million hectares of tribal land on behalf of King Goodwill Zwelithini.

The ANC’s national conference last month passed a series of resolutions aimed at accelerating the pace of land reform. Among these was a decision to dissolve the trust — set up to appease Zwelithini on the eve of the 1994 elections — and establish mechanisms to transfer the land and assets under its control to the government and finally to individuals and communities living on the land.

The trust has also come under fire from the parliamentary high-level panel on the assessment of key legislation and the acceleration of fundamental change, which recommended the dissolution of the trust. It was identified as an obstacle to security of land tenure for rural people in the province in its final report last November.

The panel called for the repeal of the 1994 Ingonyama Trust Act and the transfer of its assets to the land affairs ministry, which should act as a custodian of these assets on behalf of people living on trust land.

On Wednesday, KwaZulu-Natal’s 300-odd amakhosi (chiefs), most of whom live on land administered by the trust, will meet in Durban to discuss their response to the panel’s report. The meeting, convened by the trust with the endorsement of Zwelithini, is expected to oppose the recommendations. The province’s House of Traditional Leaders and the regional houses will also attend.

The panel has already come under fire from the king in articles in the Bayede newspaper, which accused members of the panel, including former president Kgalema Motlanthe, its chairperson, of trying to destroy the monarch and the institutions of traditional leadership.

The Congress of Traditional Leaders of South Africa has warned against the ANC trying to limit the powers of the amakhosi.

Judge Jerome Ngwenya, the chairperson of the Ingonyama Trust board, which administers the trust, confirmed that they had called the meeting at the request of amakhosi, who were concerned about the panel’s recommendations.

A second meeting would discuss the ANC’s resolutions after the first forum had concluded its work.

“We will first be dealing with the high level panel, which released its report just ahead of the ANC conference. We will then be discussing the ANC’s resolutions and how they impact on the amakhosi, the monarchy and the trust,” Ngwenya said.

The amakhosi were angry because, according to Ngwenya, the panel had consulted neither the traditional leaders nor Zwelithini. “The panel has made recommendations which are critical to us, including that the Ingonyama Trust must be abolished and that all land that it controls and therefore the king holds on behalf of his people must be given back to government and that government in turn must give title to individual people.”

He said the panel report was “superficial” and “evidently only consulted a partisan group of people and not one serious stakeholder”.

“One would have expected a panel headed by a former president to have shown his majesty the courtesy of a visit and some show of respect, to explain what their mandate was and what they were up to.”

Ngwenya said the meeting of the amakhosi was urgent. “Amakhosi are angry that they had not been consulted and have asked that this meeting be convened so they can be taken through the report, discuss it and respond to it accordingly.”

He would not be drawn on what the response would be, saying that the meeting would decide on a course of action and report to Zwelithini. The king had been briefed on the meeting and supported it. “At this stage, his majesty is not attending. He is aware of it and has already made his comments when he met the top six of the ANC.”

Ngwenya said Zwelithini and the amakhosi would have “questions that have to be asked of the high- level panel”.

He added that the Ingonyama Trust would continue with its programmes, including consolidating agreements between mining houses and traditional authorities, despite the panel’s recommendations.

“Currently we are in discussion with the ministry of minerals and we are consulting with mining houses to involve communities in mining.”

Ngwenya said the dissolution of the trust “would deprive many rural people of the protection that comes with the trust. At this stage, there is no alternative structure with the capacity to manage this communal land. In the rest of the country, the ministry runs this but they don’t have the infrastructure to do the job that the trust is currently doing.”

The panel said in its report that people who testified at its hearings “complained that they are currently more vulnerable to dispossession than they were before 1994”.

“The problem is especially acute in areas where mining is taking place in former homeland areas, and in areas administered by the Ingonyama Trust in KwaZulu-Natal. People complain that traditional leaders and officials deny their land rights [including long-standing customary rights] and assert that traditional leaders have the sole authority to sign agreements with investors in respect of communal land.”

The panel said mining deals that “enrich a select few while excluding the ordinary people whose land rights are at stake” were being concluded “only because officials collude with elites in ignoring various oversight and accountability provisions set out in law”.

“The unintended consequence of the lack of legislative protection for the land tenure of rural people is that powerful players have been able to strategically take advantage of their vulnerabilities. These actors include transnational mining companies, foreign investors, traditional leaders, traditional councils and commercial farmers, who continue to benefit from the lack of state regulation to address the structural inequalities and vulnerabilities created by colonialism and apartheid,” it said.

The panel was scathing about the trust’s apparent abuse of its revenue collection system, which was more than R96-million in the 2015-2016 financial year in leases for rural businesses.

“There is little evidence that the revenue generated by leases is used for the benefit of communities or their material wellbeing. The trust has built up very substantial reserves,” it said.

The panel report pointed to criticism of the trust by the National Assembly’s portfolio committee on rural development and land reform for a lack of transparency and its failure to use revenue for the benefit of people. It also highlighted the trust’s failure to comply with the Public Finance Management Act and the auditor general’s criticisms of it.

The panel added that there was a “pressing need” to create mechanisms for people whose rights had been violated by the trust to seek restitution.

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Paddy Harper
Paddy Harper

Related stories

KZN officials cash in on ‘danger pay for Covid-19’

Leadership failures at Umdoni local municipality in KwaZulu-Natal have caused a ‘very unhappy’ ANC PEC to fire the mayor and chief whip

South Africa must revisit and refresh its idea of itself

Covid has propelled citizens into feelings of a new shared identity in which the historical force of ‘whiteness’ is fading into irrelevance

Durban city manager says NPA erred in his bail conditions

The corruption-fraught metro is coming to grips with having a municipal manager who is on bail for graft, yet has returned to work

Does the Expropriation Bill muddy the land question even further?

Land ownership and its equitable distribution has floundered. Changes to a section of the constitution and the expropriation act are now before parliament, but do they offer any solution?

Free State branches gun for Ace

Parts of the provincial ANC will target their former premier, Magashule, and the Free State PEC in a rolling mass action campaign

Eusebius McKaiser: Reject the dichotomy of political horrors

Senekal shows us that we must make a stand against the loud voice of the populist EFF and racist rightwingers

Subscribers only

The shame of 40 000 missing education certificates

Graduates are being left in the lurch by a higher education department that is simply unable to deliver the crucial certificates proving their qualifications - in some cases dating back to 1992

The living nightmare of environmental activists who protest mine expansion

Last week Fikile Ntshangase was gunned down as activists fight mining company Tendele’s expansions. Community members tell the M&G about the ‘kill lists’ and the dread they live with every day

More top stories

Greed won’t end the vaccine wars

In the race for a safe and effective vaccine, human rights and honesty should be prioritised above profits, say activists

‘Beat the heat with cool zones’

Temperatures being recorded in some parts of South Africa are already close to the limits at which humans can survive

When politicians talk about ‘our people’, who are they referring...

The same government that talks about being in service of ‘our people fails poor, black children whose only dream is to receive an education

A Landie icon is born

Replacing one of the most-loved cars in history, the new Defender pulls off the near impossible task of doing almost everything better

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday