Krog, Pauw speak out on newspaper’s decision to publish Hofmeyr’s views

Prominent authors Antjie Krog and Jacques Pauw have spoken of their disappointment at being featured alongside apartheid apologist and racist Steve Hofmeyr in a weekend paper.

Jacques Pauw called Hofmeyr’s piece in Rapport a “racist rant”, while poet Antjie Krog lamented the fact that the weekly Afrikaans newspaper just wanted “a bit of fun and controversy after the men have spoken the real truth”.

Rapport editor Waldimar Pelser used Pauw and Krog’s names to defend his decision to publish Hofmeyr’s opinion piece “Die val van ’n fout” by arguing that his paper expressed a variety of views.

When asked to comment on Hofmeyr’s piece, which analysed the future of the country after President Cyril Ramaphosa’s rise to power, Pauw said the “uninformed racists rant” was “… neither intelligent nor well-written”.

“Hofmeyr appeals to a section of the white electorate and that is probably why Rapport decided to publish his racist rant,” said Pauw.


“Hofmeyr feeds on the fear and ignorance of right-wingers and [his piece] doesn’t contribute to the national debate.”

Krog believes that the manner in which her piece and opinion were presented by Pelser’s comments is another example of Afrikaner patriarchy.

“When I saw how my piece was presented, I said to myself: ‘hey what else did you expect’,” Krog told the Mail & Guardian.

As a woman, Krog said she was lumped in the same category as Hofmeyr, because neither of them would be given prominent space in publications. She argued that herself and Hofmeyr would be sidelined for male writers who were ostensibly more respected.

“Of course, the main menere would never position themselves next to Hofmeyr, nor would they use the piece of their professor-of-the-middle-page in that way. That is where the opinion of women belong – myself and Hofmeyr, the two lawaaimakers, a bit of fun and controversy after the men have spoken the real truth.”

Pelser defended his editorial decision to publish Hofmeyr’s opinion piece, saying that, like many Sunday papers, Rapport does “not shy away from controversy” even if the “drastically opposing views shock, offend or sooth”.

“Mr. Hofmeyr’s critics, in whose ranks we have been counted, too, might say that we should not have offered to publish this piece at all, given its content. But then the content of the piece we published has not once been cited as the reason for this furore,” said Pelser.

Krog did not agree with Hofmeyr’s piece, but believes that the English press has caricatured Hofmeyr, arguing that he is a “more nuanced figure in the Afrikaans speaking community”.

“He once energetically defended his fans and audience after they have been ridiculed in a review of one of his concerts as low(er) class,” she told the M&G.

Pauw said that he would not have published Hofmeyr’s piece if he was editor of Rapport, because “It gives [Hofmeyr] the oxygen he needs to regurgitate his bile.”

Pelser said that the reason for the unhappiness with Hofmeyr’s opinion in Rapport seems to be that a history of Hofmeyr’s comments and tirades over the years has rendered all of his opinions “unworthy of publication”.

The debate over whether Hofmeyr’s piece should have been published in Rapport began over the weekend when prominent journalist and columnist Max du Preez criticised it over twitter.

Rapport’s “political analyst”, pop singer Steve Hofmeyr, on ANC presidents: “The full reality of SA is beyond their comprehension because they could never escape the homeland mentality”

— Max du Preez (@MaxduPreez) February 18, 2018

Responding to criticism led by Du Preez, Pelser tweeted on Sunday:

Hofmeyr has become known for defending the apartheid flag, and for tweeting that “blacks were the architects of apartheid”.

According to Hofmeyr’s opinion piece, “The full reality of SA is beyond their comprehension because they could never escape the homeland mentality.”

Some other users hit out, challenging Hofmeyr’s comment as unfounded for an individual who had never lived in a homeland.

One Twitter user called for Hofmeyr to leave the country, another to banish him from social media, while most questioned Rapport’s editorial decision to publish the piece.

Pelser said that he had published a piece of someone with a view and asked his detractors if his decision had been wrong.

Many on twitter sided with Pelser, arguing that no-one should be censored — no matter how hated their opinion may be.

While other tweets challenged the notion that Rapport’s publication of Hofmeyr’s piece was enabling free speech — arguing that it was just feeding fears and insecurities. Radio journalist Ilse Salzwedel tweeted that the Rapport needs to stop feeding the fear of right-wingers.

On Monday morning, Hofmeyr seemingly responded to all the heat by posting his monthly “racist check-in”.

Despite critique on his piece in Rapport, Krog said that Hofmeyr’s few literary books had “earned him some praise from tough left leaning critics”.

After repeated attempts, the M&G has yet to reach Rapport’s ombudsman.

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Raeesa Pather
Raeesa Pather
Ra’eesa Pather is a Cape Town-based general news and features journalist.

Related stories

The Facebook group taking on South Africa’s white right

Online battle over the ‘white genocide’ narrative on social media has dangerous real-world consequences

Time running out for Parliament to deal with abuses at spy agency

A 100-page report details 'serious breaches of the Constitution, policy, law, regulations and directives' by the former president

The real Afrikaans experience

‘People are generally so fucken switched off’ – how Lategan puts readers into his characters’ shoes

Sanef heads to Equality Court to protect journalists, EFF to oppose bid

The South African National Editors’ Forum wants an end to the harassment and abuse of journalists and an apology from Malema and the EFF

Take a long, hard look in the mirror

Social media has made us obsess about the behaviour of others and ignore our own

Editorial: Don’t bed down with the powerful

'The lesson for every journalist is consistently to introspect on how we deal with sources and manage our own political leanings'
Advertising

Subscribers only

Covid-19 surges in the Eastern Cape

With people queuing for services, no water, lax enforcement of mask rules and plenty of partying, the virus is flourishing once again, and a quarter of the growth is in the Eastern Cape

Ace prepares ANC branches for battle

ANC secretary general Ace Magashule is ignoring party policy on corruption-charged officials and taking his battle to branch level, where his ‘slate capture’ strategy is expected to leave Ramaphosa on the ropes

More top stories

Sudan’s government gambles over fuel-subsidy cuts — and people pay...

Economists question the manner in which the transitional government partially cut fuel subsidies

Traditional healers need new spaces

Proper facilities supported by well-researched cultural principles will go a long way to improving the image and perception of the practice of traditional medicine

Did Botswana execute ‘poachers’ ?

The Botswana Defence Force’s anti-poaching unit has long been accused of a ‘shoot to kill’ policy. Over 20 years the unit has killed 30 Namibians and 22 Zimbabweans

Limpopo big-game farmer accused of constant harassment

A family’s struggle against alleged intimidation and failure to act by the authorities mirrors the daily challenges farm dwellers face
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…