/ 17 March 2018

De Lille vindicated by NPA announcement on Zuma

It was September 9 1999, that I went to Parliament and asked for this investigation. After such a long time, I really feel vindicated, says Patricia de Lille.
Patricia de Lille's GOOD party will be contesting the 2019 elections nationally and in all the nine provinces. (Netwerk24/Adrian de Kock )

Almost two decades after she went to Parliament to call for a probe into the arms deal, Patricia de Lille says she finally feels “vindicated” after the National Prosecuting Authority announced on Friday that former president Jacob Zuma will face corruption charges.

READ MORE: Rewind to 2005: Jacob Zuma has been charged

“He always said he wanted his day in court. He is a pensioner now; so now he has time to spend his own money on lawyers to prepare to give his side of the story,” she told News24 shortly after the announcement.

“It was September 9 1999, that I went to Parliament and asked for this investigation. After such a long time, I really feel vindicated.”

NPA head Shaun Abrahams said it would prosecute Zuma on 16 charges of corruption, money laundering and racketeering.

Arms deal: A citizen’s guide to coughing up for con men

The charges relate to 783 questionable payments Zuma allegedly received in connection with the controversial multibillion rand arms deal.

De Lille was the initial whistleblower regarding the arms deal.

Now a DA member and Cape Town mayor, she was a Pan Africanist Congress MP at the time.

‘Right decision’

De Lille lauded the NPA for “finally making the right decision”.

“It should have been done a long time ago, even before we wasted millions on the Seriti Commission that [allegedly] had a predetermined outcome.”

Zuma appointed the commission in September 2011, after the Western Cape High Court was asked in 2009 to set up an independent judicial inquiry into alleged corruption related to the arms deal.

The arms deal saw government acquiring, among other items, 26 Gripen fighter aircraft, 24 Hawk lead-in fighter trainer aircraft for the South African Air Force, and frigates and submarines for the South African Navy.

The then president said the commission had concluded that there was no room for it to “draw adverse inferences, inconsistent with the direct, credible evidence presented to it”.

“Government had been of the view that any findings pointing to wrongdoing should be given to law enforcement agencies for further action. There are no such findings and the Commission does not make any recommendations,” Zuma said at the time. – News24