#MeToo-era Pulitzers give Trump one on the nose

This year the Pulitzer juries responded to the zeitgeist of the Donald Trump era, awarding prizes to works that appraise perhaps the most notable pitfall of the man’s presidency — a society that finds itself increasingly divided along the faultlines of race and gender.

Setting a precedent, this year rapper Kendrick Lamar became the first nonclassical, non-jazz artist to win the prestigious prize for music. The committee also awarded the prize for public service to The New York Times and The New Yorker, and the prize for investigative reporting to The Washington Post, for blowing the lid off institutionalised sexism.

All these bodies of work have found themselves at the centre of movements taking on the culture of impunity about the violence faced by black Americans and women.

Lamar won the award for his 2017 album Damn, which the award panel described as “a virtuosic song collection unified by its vernacular authenticity and rhythmic dynamism that offers affecting vignettes capturing the complexity of modern African-American life”.

The Grammy-nominated artist’s album edged out Michael Gilbertson’s Quartet, which follows the conventions of the string quartet, and Ted Hearne’s Sound from the Bench, a work that mixes chamber choir music with more contemporary instrumental elements. Last year the prize was awarded to an operatic work, Angel’s Bone, by Du Yun.

David Hajdu, one of the music jurors this year, told the New York Times that the panel was forced to consider hip-hop as a genre with “value on its own terms and not just as a resource for use in a field that is more broadly recognised by the institutional establishment as serious or legitimate”.

The recognition comes hard on the heels of a growing acceptance of the genre within sanctified cultural institutions over the past year, including Jay-Z becoming the first rapper to be inducted into the Songwriters’ Hall of Fame.

Damn takes up some of the political criticism of his highly acclaimed 2015 offering, To Pimp a Butterfly, featuring the track Alright, which became a war cry for the #BlackLivesMatter movement.

Trump, whose election the artist once described as a “complete mindfuck”, is not exempt from Lamar’s pointed political commentary. In The Heart Part 4, a pre-album track from Damn, Lamar angrily cuts down the president, placing him among a motley crew of political and cultural villains. “Donald Trump is a chump, know how we feel, punk,” he spits.

Although Ronan Farrow’s remarkable New Yorker investigation, headlined “Donald Trump, a Playboy model, and a system for concealing infidelity”, wasn’t among those honoured by the Pulitzer board, the fact that it was awarded the prize for a range of other articles that take sexual harassers to task seems like a thumb in the eye of the man whom many regard as the face of sexism.

The investigations led by Jodi Kantor, Megan Twohey and Farrow, which became a catalyst for the viral #MeToo movement, were described by the board as “explosive, impactful journalism that exposed powerful and wealthy sexual predators”.

The legendary takedown of Harvey Weinstein has brought to light a running list of 85 women who have accused the Hollywood mogul of rape and sexual abuse, ultimately leading to his cultural exile. The exposés have also directly ended the careers of political commentator Bill O’Reilly, comic Louis CK and restaurateur Ken Friedman.

#MeToo has also helped to force institutions such as the United States’ national gymnastics body and Vice Media to own up for failing to intervene in cases of rape and sexual harassment.

The Pulitzer board also recognised The Washington Post for its investigation into sexual misconduct accusations against American senate candidate Roy Moore by six teenage girls, a report that upended the Alabama senate race.

The Pulitzer prize has long stood as a symbol of sanctified Americanness, but nowadays what that means — especially to a section of the elite that has in the past associated its patriotism with liberal values — seems shaken by the very public outpouring of racist, sexist and other prejudicial ideologies.

And so, what seems like a cultural renaissance might be this elite’s way of dealing with the USs’s steady drift towards the right. 

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Sarah Smit
Sarah Smit
Sarah Smit is a general news reporter at the Mail & Guardian. She covers topics relating to labour, corruption and the law.

Related stories


Subscribers only

How lottery execs received dubious payments through a private company

The National Lottery Commission is being investigated by the SIU for alleged corruption and maladministration, including suspicious payments made to senior NLC employees between 2016 and 2017

Pandemic hobbles learners’ futures

South African schools have yet to open for the 2021 academic year and experts are sounding the alarm over lost learning time, especially in the crucial grades one and 12

More top stories

Zuma, Zondo play the waiting game

The former president says he will talk once the courts have ruled, but the head of the state capture inquiry appears resigned to letting the clock run out as the commission's deadline nears

Disinformation harms health and democracy

Conspiracy theorists abuse emotive topics to suck the air out of legitimate debate and further their own sinister agendas

Uganda: ‘I have never seen this much tear-gas in an...

Counting was slow across Uganda as a result of the internet shutdown, which affected some of the biometric machines used to validate voter registrations.

No way out for Thales in arms deal case, court...

The arms manufacturer has argued that there was no evidence to show that it was aware of hundreds of indirect payments to Jacob Zuma, but the court was not convinced.

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…