Titans face off in banks case


In a stuffy beige courtroom in Pretoria this week, some of the country’s top legal minds faced off in the battle between the Competition Commission and the 23 banks it has accused of rigging the rand.

The line-up of advocates was staggering and no doubt pricey. Wim Trengove, Frank Snyckers, Rafik Bhana, Arnold Subel, Kate Hofmeyr and Alfred Cockrell, were just a few big hitters who represented the banks, and the commission had the likes of Adila Hassim, Tembeka Ngcukaitobi and Dali Mpofu in its corner.

Phalanxes of attorneys accompanied them, jostling for space with the towers of legal files, officials and occasional members of the press. And yet the actual question of whether these banks and their employees are guilty of manipulating the rand was not dealt with.

The country’s litigation superstars were gathered instead to argue the many exception applications — or the preliminary objections the banks have raised — against the commission’s referral of the case to the Competition Tribunal. To put it another way, this is the skirmish to decide the terrain on which the war will be fought. If the tribunal agrees with the banks, this could scupper the commission’s case.

There is a lot at stake. Worldwide, major banks, including some of the ones cited in this case, have collectively been fined billions of dollars for similar cases of rigging foreign exchange and benchmark interest rates. Typically they have settled rather than face open court.

In South Africa, the preliminary leg of this case is being played out in an economy reeling from corporate corruption scandals, which have included major state-owned enterprises and private sector firms. It makes sense that some of the biggest local banks, such as Investec and Standard Bank, will dig in their heels to avoid being lumped, in the public’s eye at least, with the likes of Steinhoff and Eskom.

The banks put forward a number of often overlapping arguments about why the tribunal should dismiss the matter. These include that the commission’s case is so vague that they do not know how to plead, and that, in the case of the foreign banks, the tribunal has no jurisdiction over them. Related to the question of jurisdiction is the question of whether the banks’ actions had an effect in South Africa and affected the economic wellbeing of its people.

Some of the foreign banks, such JP Morgan, are also fighting “bilateral skirmishes”, as Mpofu put it. It is arguing that references to proceedings in the United States, where JP Morgan Chase & Co signed plea agreements with the authorities and admitted guilt in a similar foreign exchange-rigging plot, be struck out of the commission’s referral.

Although the investigation into the banks began in 2015 and the case was referred to the tribunal in February last year, the process has been dogged by delays. The banks blame the commission and the commission has had to supplement its referral documents three times along the way. Investec has gone so far as to ask the tribunal to issue a declaratory order, stating that the commission’s prosecution of the matter has been “vexatious and unreasonable”.

But the commission’s divisional manager of the cartels division, Makgale Mohlala, told the Mail & Guardian that “these exceptions are really a way of blocking the case being heard on merits”.

In a further supplementary affidavit, made in December, the commission details specific trades that it argues are a manifestation of the “overarching agreement … and/or a collusive practice” between the banks.

Trengove, acting for Investec, said, however, that the commission had not given enough “particularity” to show that there was an overarching agreement between the banks, or evidence of a concerted practice by the banks, a position many of the banks echoed.

But Mpofu scoffed that this amounted to “faking ignorance”.

Ngcukaitobi said the commission had clearly outlined how the banks’ traders, by establishing and joining electronic chat rooms on certain trading platforms, immediately had knowledge of competing traders’ positions and past and future trades, as well as access to sensitive information about other traders’ customers. This included who they were and what positions they might hold in the market.

READ MORE: Competition commission resolute in bank collusion hearings

“There is … no sensible objection to the lack of specificity in relation to how this agreement came into being,” Ngcukaitobi said.

Foreign banks also argued that the tribunal had no jurisdiction over them because several of them had no branches or representative offices in South Africa.

They also questioned whether it could be proved that their traders’ actions affected the rand.

John Campbell, acting for BNP Paribas, argued that the rand was heavily traded globally, and was used as a surrogate for trade in resources in the same way that the Canadian or Australian dollars were.

READ MORE: Banks bust: ‘Price-rigging’ fine would be enough to wipe out SA’s budget deficit

“It seems … by no means obvious that could have any economic effect within South Africa,” he said.

But Hassim argued that the extra-territorial power of the tribunal and its right to hold international banks to account was unambiguous. The tribunal was required 
to give full effect to the purpose of the Competition Act, she said, especially in a matter involving “allegations of international collusive conduct and conspiracy taking place over online communications platforms”.

Whether the banks’ actions had an effect on South Africans that could be considered “direct, substantive and foreseeable” — which is a test that is applied in international competition law — was not required by the Act, she argued.

And this question of the interpretation of the law could not be decided when considering exception applications, she said. Instead the appropriate place to decide this is when the merits of the case are heard.

With this much legal muscle fighting for each side, and the complexity of the case, the tribunal has an enormous task ahead of it. It is not clear who will win but what is clear is that there is a long, expensive battle ahead and many more days in airless courtrooms before South Africans have an answer.

Subscribe to the M&G for R2 a month

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

And for this weekend only, you can become a subscriber by paying just R2 a month for your first three months.

Lynley Donnelly
Lynley Donnelly
Lynley is a senior business reporter at the Mail & Guardian. But she has covered everything from social justice to general news to parliament - with the occasional segue into fashion and arts. She keeps coming to work because she loves stories, especially the kind that help people make sense of their world.

Related stories

ANC: ‘We’re operating under conditions of anarchy’

In its latest policy documents, the ANC is self-critical and wants ‘consequence management’, yet it’s letting its members off the hook again

‘We struggle for water, but power stations and coal mines don’t’

A proposed pipeline will bring water polluted with Gauteng’s sewage to the Waterberg in Limpopo to boost the coal industry during the climate crisis

The solar energy market will grow if innovative business models are developed

Southern African suppliers should consider entering into partnerships with financiers to offer off-grid, hybrid and prepaid solutions to customers

Eskom’s emissions are not compatible with the South African constitution

The government must not cave to Eskom’s demand that it be exempt from air pollution rules. Furthermore, the power utility needs to stay true to the principles of its own just transition strategy

Ramaphosa: We want investment pledges to translate into new jobs

To move out of South Africa’s economic funk, Ramaphosa is prioritising the materialisation of pledges made at the previous investment conferences.

Fossil fuel support lands SA in the G20 dog box

South Africa has been ranked the second worst performer of the G20 non-OECD member countries, behind Saudi Arabia, for its lack of transparency and continued support for fossil production, fossil-fuel based power and consumption of fossil fuels

Subscribers only

ANC: ‘We’re operating under conditions of anarchy’

In its latest policy documents, the ANC is self-critical and wants ‘consequence management’, yet it’s letting its members off the hook again

Q&A Sessions: ‘I think I was born way before my...

The chief executive of the Estate Agency Affairs Board and the deputy chair of the SABC board, shares her take on retrenchments at the public broadcaster and reveals why she hates horror movies

More top stories

Between dark and light was Maradona

The life of Diego Armando Maradona, who died this week, will always remind us that the smell of shit is as important as the perfume of flowers, writes Niren Tolsi

Public protector’s ‘mistakes’ were made to nail the president, court...

Busisiwe Mkhwebane discarded facts that were inconvenient to her when she investigated the CR17 campaign, Cyril Ramaphosa’s lawyers argued

Student funding scheme gets new chief executive and board

The National Student Financial Aid Scheme has been under administration for two years after its board was dissolved and its boss resigned not even halfway through his term

General Council of the Bar slams Zuma Foundation

Another summons has been served on Jacob Zuma at his Nkandla residence, requiring the former president to appear before the Zondo Commission next year

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…