Zuma abused his office and should not receive special treatment, court hears

Former president Jacob Zuma abused his office and has always been given special treatment, the Pretoria high court heard on Tuesday.

Both the Democratic Alliance (DA) and Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have brought applications to the high court asking it to set aside the decisions made by the state attorney granting requests by Zuma to fund his legal costs in his criminal cases.

The Presidency has previously said the state would carry on covering Zuma’s legal fees until a court decides otherwise.

However, arguing before a full Bench on Tuesday, Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, representing the EFF, said the state had given Zuma and his former attorney, Michael Hulley, “a blank cheque”.

Ngcukaitobi said the party sought an order directing the former president and Hulley to pay back money spent by the state attorney in Zuma’s legal battle.

President Cyril Ramaphosa previously revealed that R15.3-million had already been paid in the time Zuma had been challenging the “spy tapes” corruption matter — recordings of an apparent plot against him — as he faces charges related to allegedly accepting a bribe from French arms company Thales in the awarding of an arms deal.

‘An element of favouritism’

Ngcukaitobi argued, however, that the amount of R15.3-million did not “square up”.

“There is no meaningful reply on actually how much was spent. There was a failure of proper record-keeping and proper management,” he said.

Ngcukaitobi further said since Zuma had lost his appeal in the corruption matter in the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA), he should be liable to pay costs.

“Mr Zuma lost the appeal before the SCA, despite that, he said if he loses he will pay (but) officials said we will settle his legal fees and we will settle his costs.

“It was always his legal fees that were of concern but never costs if he lost,” Ngcukaitobi said.

“Zuma has been given special treatment (and) there has been an element of favouritism. He (Zuma) must be treated like everyone else,” he added.

He added that according to the state attorney, the office had funded nine cases in which Zuma was involved. He argued that Zuma should approach Legal Aid for funding.

No authorisation to pay for private attorneys

Meanwhile, the DA has argued for an order setting aside the decision by the director general in the Presidency and the state attorney to fund Zuma’s succession of personal litigation.

Sean Rosenberg SC — arguing on behalf of the DA — said the State Attorney Act and treasury regulations did not authorise the state to pay for the work and costs incurred by private attorneys.

Rosenberg told judges that the criminal prosecution was against Zuma in his personal capacity and therefore the state should not pay for his legal fees.

“The state attorney has requested to act on his behalf not on behalf of government,” Rosenberg said.

“Section 3 (1) authorises the state attorney to act on behalf of government and perform the work ordinarily performed by attorneys and other legal representatives in court.”

In March, former National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) boss Shaun Abrahams announced that the NPA would go ahead with the prosecution of Zuma on 16 charges, including corruption, money laundering and racketeering.

The charges were dropped in 2009 by former NPA boss Mokotedi Mpshe, based on recordings, the “spy tapes“, which were presented to him by Zuma’s legal team.

The tapes were made up of recordings of telephone conversations between then Scorpions boss Leonard McCarthy and former NPA boss Bulelani Ngcuka, which Zuma’s legal team claimed showed political interference in the decision to charge him.

The charges were subsequently withdrawn, just before Zuma was sworn in for his first term as president.

The hearing continues. — News24

Jeanette Chabalala
Jeanette Chabalala
Sports Fanatic,Current affairs Junkie,News24 Journalist.
Advertisting

De Klerk now admits apartheid was a crime against humanity

Apartheid’s last president walks back comments that definition was a Soviet plot

February 11 1990: Mandela’s media conquest

Nelson Mandela’s release from prison was also South Africa’s first ‘media event’. And, despite the NP’s, and the SABC’s, attempt to control the narrative, the force of Madiba’s personality meant that he emerged as a celebrity

Eastern Cape MEC orders graft investigation after two workers killed...

The killing of two council workers at the Amathole district municipality appears to be linked to tender fraud and corruption

Strike-off case pulls in judge

Judge Mushtak Parker is implicated in an application to strike off his former partners. He is also involved in the fight between the Western Cape high court’s judge president and his deputy
Advertising

Press Releases

Response to the report of the independent assessors

VUT welcomes the publishing of the report of the independent assessors to investigate concerns of poor governance, leadership, management, corruption and fraud at the university.

NWU student receives international award

Carol-Mari Schulz received the Bachelor of Health Sciences in Occupational Hygiene Top Achiever Award.

Academic programme resumes at all campuses

Lectures, practicals, seminars and tutorials will all resume today as per specific academic timetables.

Strategic social investments are a catalyst for social progress

Barloworld Mbewu enables beneficiaries to move away from dependence on grant funding

We all have a part to play to make South Africa work

Powering societal progress demands partnerships between all stakeholders

So you want to be a social entrepreneur?

Do the research first; it will save money and time later

Social entrepreneurship means business

Enterprises with a cause at their core might be exactly what our economy desperately needs

Looking inwards

Businesses are finding tangible ways to give back – but only because consumers demand it