Boards can’t simply quit en masse

COMMENT

Recent scandals in the private and public sectors have focused attention on the duties of directors to the companies they serve, the shareholders and employees, and the public.

In the face of increased scrutiny for noncompliance with fiduciary duties and the threat of legal liability, many directors vacate their positions before the end of their terms of office. This includes directors of some state-owned entities (SOEs).

At the beginning of February, nine out of 11 Public Investment Corporation (PIC) board members wrote to Finance Minister Tito Mboweni requesting that he release them from their roles as directors.

The letter cited a “concerted effort to discredit the board” as one reason for their request.

This followed allegations that certain PIC board members had improperly influenced investment decisions or failed to provide proper oversight over investment decisions such as the controversial R4.3-billion investment into Ayo Technology Solutions. These allegations are being ventilated before the PIC judicial commission of inquiry.


READ MORE: Ayo financials tampered with on Survé’s instruction, says ex-chief exec

It is not impossible to imagine future instances in which the directors of SOEs will seek to unilaterally resign en masse to protect themselves from potential liability for damages and losses incurred as a result of directors’ decisions.

Regulators such as the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission or other interested parties may also apply to a court to have a director declared delinquent, thereby disqualifying them from being appointed to any other board.

Our courts have not often ruled on mass resignations by directors.

In 2006, the high court in Johannesburg did so in the case of Minister of Water Affairs & Forestry vs Stilfontein Gold Mining Company Ltd & others.

In this case, all directors at Stilfontein resigned after the company had repeatedly failed to comply with the directives issued by the department.

The directors said they had been advised to resign because they risked being regarded as party to reckless trading if they continued to sit on the board.

The judge found that it was reckless for the board of a listed public company to resign en masse, thereby leaving the company without any directors. The judge said that directors were the human agents through which a company acts. Except in certain limited circumstances, a company is usually unable to act without a board.

Stilfontein’s board should have called a meeting of shareholders to elect a new board and limit the negative effect on the share price.

The judge found that the directors had not acted in good faith towards the company and had failed to comply with the corporate governance standards set out in the King II Code of Corporate Governance, which applied at the time.

The Stilfontein case concerned a public company, but the general principles laid out by the court find equal application to SOEs. When contemplating a mass resignation, the board members of an SOE must consider the following:

• The circumstances that led them to consider resigning. The board must consider whether a court would find their resignation irresponsible, given the circumstances. For example, a court is unlikely to view a unilateral mass resignation positively if the board’s participation in malfeasance has destabilised a SOE and the resignations are an attempt to escape accountability; and

• The board must act in good faith and in the bests interests of the SOE. Directors must consider (a) the legitimate interests of the Cabinet, employees and other oversight bodies, and (b) the legal requirements and operational needs of the SOE, including its service delivery mandate.

The board must also consider whether the SOE can function without a board and how complex the process of replacing the board is.

In their letter to Mboweni, the PIC board members said they were willing to stay on until the minister appointed a new board.

They were mindful of the potential legal consequences of a mass resignation in light of the fact that the PIC is an asset manager and a SOE.

Of course, these considerations apply to a lesser extent in a scenario where the minister wishes to remove the board and requests the directors to resign.

In that situation, one can presume that the minister would have taken advice on the relevant legal process for the appointment of a new board and would already have replacement directors in mind.

The decision to resign should not always be perceived from a director’s unilateral lens. Directors should be mindful of their importance in the company.

A decision to resign as part of a group should balance that director’s personal and collective circumstances against the interests of all other role players in the SOE.

Sihle Bulose is an attorney at the Sandton-based law firm, RM & Partners. These are his own views

Subscribe to the M&G for R2 a month

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

And for this weekend only, you can become a subscriber by paying just R2 a month for your first three months.

Sihle Bulose
Sihle Bulose
Sihle Bulose is an attorney at the Sandton-based law firm, RM & Partners. These are his own views.

Related stories

Covid-19 causes Acsa to dust off its begging bowl

The SOE has asked the government for R3.5-billion in extra support over the next three years to offset losses incurred because of the pandemic

More arrests expected in the R2.3bn VBS heist

Prosecutors tell the court that more people will be charged and additional charges will be added to the seven accused in a new charge sheet

Justice department hit by a costly cyberattack

The theft of R10-million from the Guardian’s Fund account prompts the justice department to freeze all accounts until an audit can determine the extent of the damage

Ace pulls diplomatic strings for Steinhoff-linked pal

If the ANC general secretary has his way, Ithala chair Roshan Morar could soon be an ambassador

All agree: Use pension funds

The state wants to increase spending on infrastructure to drive economic recovery, and South Africans’ savings could help foot the bill

ANC wants pension funds to finance infrastructure build

The party released its plan for the reconstruction of the country’s post-coronavirus economy on Friday. This would involve changes to Regulation 28 of the Pension Funds Act
Advertising

Subscribers only

ANC: ‘We’re operating under conditions of anarchy’

In its latest policy documents, the ANC is self-critical and wants ‘consequence management’, yet it’s letting its members off the hook again

Q&A Sessions: ‘I think I was born way before my...

The chief executive of the Estate Agency Affairs Board and the deputy chair of the SABC board, shares her take on retrenchments at the public broadcaster and reveals why she hates horror movies

More top stories

DRC: Tshisekedi and Kabila fall out

The country’s governing coalition is under strain, which could lead to even more acrimony ahead

Editorial: Crocodile tears from the coalface

Pumping limited resources into a project that is predominantly meant to extend dirty coal energy in South Africa is not what local communities and the climate needs.

Klipgat residents left high and dry

Flushing toilets were installed in backyards in the North West, but they can’t be used because the sewage has nowhere to go

Nehawu leaders are ‘betraying us’

The accusation by a branch of the union comes after it withdrew from a parliamentary process
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…