New Sars threshold could be ‘double-edged sword’

Could the taxman’s efforts to reduce its administrative burden by raising the filing threshold have the side effect of improving its revenues? The South African Revenue Service (Sars) says no, and that it is about easing processes for taxpayers, but it may be a double-edged sword for taxpayers in other ways, said one tax expert.

Last week, during its launch of the new tax season, Sars announced that the threshold for filing tax returns had been raised for individuals. Those earning less than R500 000 are no longer required to file a tax return under certain conditions, up from the previous threshold of R350 000.

The other conditions an individual must meet to avoid filing a return include: income must come from one employer; you do not receive a travel allowance, company car or other fringe benefit, which is considered an additional income; and you do not have any other forms of income such as rental from a property or income from a side business.

But the group of taxpayers relieved of this burden — those earning between R350 000 and R500 000 — was granted deductions of R44-billion in 2017, according to the most recent set of tax statistics.

The agency said the changes are unrelated to refunds or increasing revenue collection. Instead, they are to make compliance easier and cheaper for taxpayers.

Many taxpayers use public transport to Sars branches, often travelling between 200km and 300km, while others take a day off work, Sars said in response to questions.

Last year specifically, 1.1-million taxpayers who earned income of less than R350 000 filed and received an assessment outcome of zero, “a nil return”.

“Not only did these taxpayers incur cost to reach our branches, they also spent time in the queues waiting to be served,” Sars said.

It added that although this is about improving service first, it will also allow Sars to better use its capacity to service taxpayers who must submit a return more efficiently.

Determining who is not required to file is based on third-party information from institutions such as a taxpayer’s employer, medical aid scheme and bank, and the information includes documents such as their IRP5, medical certificate and insurance certificate.

The system then evaluates all this data and is able to send a prompt determining whether the individual should file. Sars then communicates directly with the taxpayer through an SMS, an email or an eFiling prompt. This, said Sars, “ensures more accuracy when identifying who is not required to file because the remaining filing criteria then still [have] to apply”.

There will be no cost saving to Sars because the existing staff will still service taxpayers

Improving revenues was not the aim of this move, said Angelique Worms, a director of the Global employer services division at Deloitte tax and legal. In Sars’s view the cost of assessing these returns and dedicating staff to managing this category of taxpayer would be unlikely to result in additional revenue, she said.

But, she noted, at the same time it could be a “double-edged sword” that sees taxpayers lose out, particularly if they have claims such as contributions to a retirement annuity or medical claims for handicapped dependents that are not recorded or captured by their employer.

She recommended that individuals file a tax return regardless of whether they met the requirements — if only to maintain a complete record with Sars.

“Keeping a complete set of records with Sars may very important,” said Worms. For example, Deloitte has experienced that when a person’s retirement annuity pays out or they require a tax directive from Sars, if Sars finds gaps in their returns history, they may be required to file these returns.

She said Sars’s systems needs to be adapted to recognise that a taxpayer was not required to file a return.

PW Botha wagged his finger and banned us in 1988 but we stood firm. We built a reputation for fearless journalism, then, and now. Through these last 35 years, the Mail & Guardian has always been on the right side of history.

These days, we are on the trail of the merry band of corporates and politicians robbing South Africa of its own potential.

To help us ensure another 35 future years of fiercely independent journalism, please subscribe.

Lynley Donnelly
Lynley Donnelly
Lynley is a senior business reporter at the Mail & Guardian. But she has covered everything from social justice to general news to parliament - with the occasional segue into fashion and arts. She keeps coming to work because she loves stories, especially the kind that help people make sense of their world.

Border walls don’t stop viruses, but a blanket amnesty might

Why South Africa should consider amnesty for undocumented migrants in the time of the coronavirus outbreak.

Mail & Guardian needs your help

Our job is to help give you the information we all need to participate in building this country, while holding those in power to account. But now the power to help us keep doing that is in your hands

Press Releases

The online value of executive education in a Covid-19 world

Executive education courses further develop the skills of leaders in the workplace

Sisa Ntshona urges everyone to stay home, and consider travelling later

Sisa Ntshona has urged everyone to limit their movements in line with government’s request

SAB Zenzele’s special AGM postponed until further notice

An arrangement has been announced for shareholders and retailers to receive a 77.5% cash payout

20th Edition of the National Teaching Awards

Teachers are seldom recognised but they are indispensable to the country's education system

Awards affirm the vital work that teachers do

Government is committed to empowering South Africa’s teachers with skills, knowledge and techniques for a changing world

SAB Zenzele special AGM rescheduled to March 25 2020

New voting arrangements are being made to safeguard the health of shareholders

Dimension Data launches Saturday School in PE

The Gauteng Saturday School has produced a number of success stories