Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

State champs at its border Bill bit

 

 

The clashes between police and immigrants during raids for counterfeit goods in Johannesburg’s city centre last week have added fuel to government’s fervour to institute the Border Management Authority Bill.

It proposes a powerful government agency to integrate and co-ordinate border control across numerous government departments.

The Bill was passed by the National Assembly in 2017 and got to the National Council of Provinces (NCOP) before lapsing when the previous Parliament rose ahead of the elections.

But the Bill is not regarded by all government sectors and civil society as the panacea for border management that the department of home affairs envisaged — despite new minister Aaron Motsoaledi’s hope that the Bill be “unstuck” from the NCOP, which he expressed in a budget vote debate in July. “The Border Management Authority Bill was passed by this House and unfortunately it got stuck in the NCOP for the past two years. Our job is now to go and unstuck it because it is very important. Border management is not only about people, it also manages counterfeit goods, stolen cars, hijacked children and all sorts of wrong things that happen in our borders. We are going to try to deal with that.”

But serious problems outlined by the likes of the treasury and the South African Revenue Service (Sars) among others, appear to have never been completely addressed.

In one of the last rounds of deliberations on the Bill held in February last year, the treasury told NCOP members that the passage of the Bill through the National Assembly’s portfolio committee on home affairs did not take the finance ministry’s input into account, while Sars was excluded from deliberations. This is significant because the Bill threatened to, as the treasury put it, “legislate away” Sars’s customs revenue collection role.

At the time the treasury said no agreement had been reached on this question, or others including whether it would be necessary to transfer any staff from Sars, in

light of the effect of any staff transfers “on the integrity of the revenue and customs value chain”. A month later the Institute for Security Studies outlined to the NCOP — and re-emphasised numerous previous submissions to Parliament — that the proposed border management authority threatened to “effectively be an additional [or] auxiliary police service, which lends itself to the creation of over-securitised zones within the Republic”.

The issues notwithstanding, the new home affairs portfolio committee chairperson, Bongani Bongo, told the Mail & Guardian that “this matter is more serious now than all of us combined”. The Bill proposes to collapse all the government departments and agencies operating on the border into the border management authority and it was important that all these entities “be in one room”. Although the contentions regarding Sars were important, he said this should not be a reason to fail to enact the Bill.

Despite the Bill’s lapsing, Bongo said legal advice had been received giving the thumbs up for the Bill to go from the NCOP to the state law advisers, for referral to the president. These matters had been “flagged by everyone”, but he said he did not envisage a situation “where we will have two collecting [agencies]”.

“We need to think about it, get everyone to participate in the discussion and see if we don’t break even out of that discussion,” he said. “But that should not stop the Bill being enacted.”

If necessary, “suspend that provision and do it in a manner that does not collapse revenue collection”, he said. The Bill was first introduced by former minister Malusi Gigaba in 2016 at the height of institutional battles over state capture. Its passage through Parliament has been dogged by speculation that it was yet another effort under the Jacob Zuma administration to undermine the treasury and further destabilise Sars.

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Lynley Donnelly
Lynley Donnelly
Lynley is a senior business reporter at the Mail & Guardian. But she has covered everything from social justice to general news to parliament - with the occasional segue into fashion and arts. She keeps coming to work because she loves stories, especially the kind that help people make sense of their world.

Related stories

Advertising

Subscribers only

Petro states: What happens when 30% of your national budget...

As the demand for oil shrinks and prices collapse, Africa’s petro states — the likes of Angola, Nigeria, Egypt and Equatorial Guinea — will be left with massive holes in their budgets

More top stories

State halts its R10bn long-term plan to fully treat acid...

The state is saddled with the burden of treating acid water and polluters are escaping the responsibility

Petro states: What happens when 30% of your national budget...

As the demand for oil shrinks and prices collapse, Africa’s petro states — the likes of Angola, Nigeria, Egypt and Equatorial Guinea — will be left with massive holes in their budgets

Europe, Asia rob West Africa of fish

Greenpeace Africa reports that the fishmeal and fish oil industry is ‘robbing the Gambia, Mauritania and Senegal of livelihoods and food’

Covid jab tech helps fight malaria

An estimated two-thirds of malaria deaths are among children under the age of five, most of them in Africa.
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×