Xolobeni mining ruling compromises the state

 

 

LAND

Many of South Africa’s mineral resources are found on communally owned and subject to customary law. As such, the discourse on land in South Africa is characterised by tensions between communities who hold informal land rights; the state, which is empowered to award mining rights; and those who seek to exploit the land and its mineral resources for financial gain.

The recent Xolobeni judgment sought to ameliorate these tensions by requiring that the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act and the Interim Protection of Informal Land Rights Act (Ipilra) be read together to ensure that, prior to awarding a right to mine, the minister of minerals and energy gets the full and informed consent from the community involved as opposed to mere consultation, as is required by the minerals Act.

The judgment is indeed a victory for customary land rights holders in mining-affected communities. But, it has also created uncertainty in the mining industry, because it seems to interfere with the state’s role as the custodian of all minerals in South Africa.

This raises the question of whether consent is absolute and whether there are other ways to protect holders of communal land rights without interfering with the state’s duty to issue mining rights.

I argue that the consent requirement casts the net too wide and that it is characterised by many challenges that render its implementation difficult, if not impossible. The following is a brief exposition of some of these challenges.


First, no regulations were ever enacted to give content to Ipilra and its consent requirement. This means there are no guidelines on how consent should be dealt with.

The only step taken by the department of rural development and land affairs in 1997 was to develop a policy document titled Interim Procedures Governing Land Development Decisions, in terms of which the minister would be required to take steps to ensure the fairness and inclusivity of the process of the consultation and the procurement of consent in cases of land development.

But the policy document has never been implemented and the department of rural development and land affairs says it has no record of ever dealing with community opposition to the granting of rights to mine.

This is contrary to the 2016 South African Human Rights Commission report, which dealt with socioeconomic issues in mining-affected communities. It found many cases of communities being opposed to the granting of rights to mine in their areas.

Furthermore, the idea of consent is known to lack diversity and inclusivity in the representation of stakeholders, because it reflects only the ideas of the elite and powerful in society at the expense of people who experience systematic disadvantage, such as women, youth and persons with disabilities.

The last challenge is that Ipilra itself provides in section 2 that the period of adequate notice within which consultation must take place as being 21 calendar days. When considering the complexities of the issues involved in consultative processes, including the vast amount of information about the potential effects of mining, the interests of community members coupled with those of the state and mining rights applicants as well as the need to negotiate special terms of agreement, it is almost impossible for 21 calendar days to constitute an adequate notice period.

In fact, this period may well defeat the purpose of meaningful participation, because it can never allow for the proper ventilation and settlement of issues.

But not all is lost. The consent requirement may be dispensed with in favour of free, prior and informed consultation. This approach would ensure that affected communities are free to voice their views without any form of coercion, intimidation or undue influence, that such consultations are in good faith and occur prior to the granting of rights to mine and that affected communities are provided with adequate information that takes into account their language and customs.

Moreover, this would ensure that the state retains sovereignty over the allocation of mining rights as well as being able to limit the possibility for individuals to halt mining activities.

Sabelo Ngubeni is a final-year law student at the University of the Witwatersrand

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Sabelo Ngubeni
Guest Author

Related stories

Does the Expropriation Bill muddy the land question even further?

Land ownership and its equitable distribution has floundered. Changes to a section of the constitution and the expropriation act are now before parliament, but do they offer any solution?

Institutions of higher learning should commemorate their casualties

The bust of Matikweni Nkuna at Tshwane University of Technology is an example of how we should honour those who fought for equal access to education

Seals abort pups in mass die-off

There are a number of factors — a pollutant, virus or bacteria or malnutrition — that may have caused the 12 000 deaths on Namibia’s coast.

Deconstructing South Africa’s construction industry performance

The construction industry has contracted sharply, partly due to Covid, and needs to rebalance its focus if it wants to survive

Editorial: SA will be bankrupted by looters

The chickens have finally come home to roost: if we do not end the looting, it will end us

The promised land? Lack of access to finance hinders farmers

The agricultural sector has grown this year, but an absence of collateral is preventing black farmers from making a go of their business
Advertising

Subscribers only

Toxic power struggle hits public works

With infighting and allegations of corruption and poor planning, the department’s top management looks like a scene from ‘Survivor’

Free State branches gun for Ace

Parts of the provincial ANC will target their former premier, Magashule, and the Free State PEC in a rolling mass action campaign

More top stories

Meyiwa murder case postponed amid drama in court

The murder case of Senzo Meyiwa has been postponed to next month after the appearance of the five suspects in the Boksburg magistrate’s court took an unexpected turn

Does the Expropriation Bill muddy the land question even further?

Land ownership and its equitable distribution has floundered. Changes to a section of the constitution and the expropriation act are now before parliament, but do they offer any solution?

Wheeling and dealing for a Covid-19 vaccine

A Covid-19 jab could cost hundreds of rands. Or not. It’s anyone’s guess. Could another pandemic almost a century ago hold clues for handling the coronavirus today?

The European companies that armed the Ivorian civil war

AN OCCRP investigation reveals that Gunvor and Semlex brokered weapons-for-oil deals in early 2011 when Côte d’Ivoire was in crisis, despite a UN arms embargo
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…

The best local and international journalism

handpicked and in your inbox every weekday