Green projects in cities are the key to big finance

At the same time, governments need to introduce new regulations and offer bigger incentives to get projects off the ground. (David Harrison/M&G)

At the same time, governments need to introduce new regulations and offer bigger incentives to get projects off the ground. (David Harrison/M&G)

COMMENT

With global leaders having recently gathered in New York City for the United Nations Climate Action Summit, it is important to remember that cities are not just convenient settings for our coexistence and dialogue, but also leading sources of greenhouse-gas emissions.

As hubs of employment, trade and innovation, cities are the engines of our economic growth, accounting for over 80% of global GDP. By mid-century, more than six billion people — almost 70% of the world’s population — will live in urban areas, up from about four billion today. Yet cities already use more than two-thirds of the world’s resources and energy, accounting for over 70% of carbon dioxide emissions.
As cities continue to grow, so will these numbers. Between 2011 and 2013, China used more cement in city development than the United States did during the entire 20th century.

The future of our planet, then, depends on how we manage urban development. In addition to being the biggest contributors to climate change, cities are also among the most at risk, and thus have the most to gain from going green. With 90% of the world’s urban areas on coastlines and at risk from rising sea levels, there is significant work to be done to protect the bulk of the world’s population from these and other climate-related threats. Cities are where spending on climate action will have the biggest effect. Making cities more compact, connected, and co-ordinated around green policies could yield economic savings of up to $17-trillion by 2050.

For starters, we must do far more to reduce energy consumption, harmful emissions, and air pollution, not least by improving energy efficiency in urban areas. Given that urban infrastructure is hard to change quickly (and lasts a long time), the time for a new conversation about urbanisation is now. Cities need to develop plans to reduce CO2 emissions, build resilience and involve all relevant sectors of the economy in the shift toward clean energy. Policymakers should be planning for adaptations to existing infrastructure and new long-term investments.

Many cities around the world are already integrating climate goals into their urban-development plans. Copenhagen has emphasised increasing its buildings’ energy efficiency. Bangalore is investing in sustainable transport. And, among other good examples, Mexico City is focused on strengthening the resilience of its most vulnerable residents to extreme weather events.

More and more cities have come to realise that climate-friendly policies have immediate benefits in terms of both quality of life and economic growth. Green investment makes economic sense, because it tends to result in better municipal services, cleaner air and safer water. Indeed, solar energy is now often cheaper than fossil fuels and plastic recycling — a key to cleaning up our oceans — is a source of steady jobs.

But cities also need to go further, by recognising the benefits of a circular economy that minimises waste. The 15 circular steps for cities, a guide from the European Investment Bank (EIB), shows that cities and their residents have much to gain — including a smaller carbon footprint — from reduced consumption and reuse of resources. Around the world, international development banks are providing cities with financing and technical assistance for climate-related projects. For the EIB, the priorities are energy efficiency, renewables, and sustainable transport.

At the same time, governments need to introduce new regulations and offer bigger incentives to get projects off the ground, and to encourage more innovation among businesses.

To that end, we need all stakeholders to be connected and on the same page. City networks such as C40 Cities, Local Governments for Sustainability and the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate and Energy offer a good starting point. These groups have the power and influence to get the right people around the same table, discussing concrete policies.

To address the critical lack of grant funding needed to advance projects to a stage where they are ready for feasibility analysis and investment, the City Climate Finance Gap Fund was launched during the UN Climate Action Summit. It aims to raise more than €100-million in grants in order to unlock at least €4-billion in projects around the world.

Government and financial leaders should bear in mind that they are not alone. They have the support of a growing global community of mayors, local officials, and private-sector leaders who are determined to usher in greener cities for all citizens. Our task (at the EIB and Global Covenant of Mayors) is to ensure that these voices are heard. — © Project Syndicate

Emma Navarro is vice-president of the European Investment Bank. Nanda Jichkar is mayor of Nagpur, India, and a board member of the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy

Emma Navarro
Nanda Jichkar

Nanda Jichkar

Nanda Jichkar is mayor of Nagpur, India, and a board member of the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy
  • Read more from Nanda Jichkar
    • Client Media Releases

      The world awaits Thandi Hlotshana
      Intelligence is central to digital businesses
      One of SA's biggest education providers has a new name: Meet PSG's Optimi