Swaziland and Lesotho give stunning examples of how countries should not want their judiciary to operate.
Abrahams should take advantage of Zuma’s vulnerability as the president’s grip on power and influence through patronage will wane along with his term.
Swaziland and Lesotho give stunning examples of how countries should not want their judiciary to operate.
It’s been a grim few weeks of mounting evidence of this impunity Zuma believes he is entitled to, while evidence is not suffered to stand in his way.
The pernicious claim is that because Parliament is elected any move to question its actions represents an undemocratic subversion of the popular will.
We signed both the Rome Statute and the African Union protocol that sitting heads of state would not be prosecuted – surely a policy contradiction.
Instead of acknowledging the logistical challenges at hospitals and clinics, the minister has tried to shift the focus to others.
Leaders promoting such hatred are no better than those leading xenophobic attacks.
The killings at Glebelands hostel continue amidst accusations of partisan law enforcement – inevitably fuelling perceptions of official complicity.
How much is enough? What will be the tipping point for those of us who are law-abiding, concerned citizens?