Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

Court must rule on constitutionality of public protector’s removal — Mpofu

Advocate Dali Mpofu, acting for embattled public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane, told the Western Cape high court on Monday that it would have to decide if removing the chapter nine head from office was constitutional. 

In March, the National Assembly adopted the 119-page report of a senior panel — comprising one constitutional court judge and two advocates — recommending a section 194 inquiry be initiated to consider removing Mkhwebane from office. This was after the panel found prima facie evidence of misconduct and incompetence, given the raft of adverse court judgments against the public protector, and the perception of bias on her part. 

Section 194 of the constitution allows for the impeachment of heads of chapter nine institutions, such as the public protector; the South African Human Rights Commission; the Commission for Gender Equality; the office of the auditor general; the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC); and the Commission for the Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic Communities.

Mkhwebane has once again turned to the courts to contest the grounds of her removal by questioning the validity and constitutionality of the National Assembly rules. 

Mpofu told the court that the case was not about the guilt or innocence of the public protector, but was based on the premise of whether her removal was constitutional. 

He referred to it as a separation of powers matter, arguing that, “The court is the only place in this country that can declare whether the [National Assembly] rules are constitutional or not.” 

He said each rule must be examined against a backdrop of rationality and the constitution and that, “if they don’t meet the test, we win”.

This application is part B of Mkhwebane’s challenge. 

The part A bid was an effort to obtain an interdict against the National Assembly’s process of removing her from office. It was finally dismissed in November 2020 after Mkhwebane appealed the decision. 

The Western Cape high court will hear the respondents in the part B challenge from Tuesday to Thursday. Among the respondents are President Cyril Ramaphosa, political parties, and the South African Human Rights Commission.

Subscribe to the M&G

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them.

Eunice Stoltz
Eunice Stoltz is a junior daily news reporter at the Mail & Guardian. She was previously a freelance journalist and a broadcaster at Maroela Media and Smile90.4FM.

Related stories

Advertising

Subscribers only

GDP, recession, JSE, rallying rand … these terms mean very...

The economy is not producing work, with many young adults working outside their fields of study or considering leaving the country as a result

More top stories

Covid jab tech helps fight malaria

An estimated two-thirds of malaria deaths are among children under the age of five, most of them in Africa.

Learners moving to other provinces puts education departments under pressure

Gauteng and the Western Cape struggle to put children in class, but Limpopo and the Eastern Cape are closing schools as enrolment plummets

New membership system encounters problems in ANC branches

The Lower South Coast region has complained of a plot by some branch secretaries to manipulate the system

Police analyst implicated in R600k fraud scheme

But the forensic analyst has also claimed to be a victim of identity fraud
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…
×