Cartons of eggs for sale at a grocery store in San Francisco, California, U.S., on Thursday, Nov. 11, 2021. U.S. consumer prices rose last month at the fastest annual pace since 1990, cementing high inflation as a hallmark of the pandemic recovery and eroding spending power even as wages surge. Photographer: David Paul Morris/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Headlines are screaming that inflation is here to stay. Consumer prices have risen by an average of 6.2% in the past year, the sharpest increase since 1991. Although Americans are supposedly — in the words of The New York Times — “flush with cash and jobs”, they are also deeply unhappy with the state of the economy.
It’s no wonder Republicans are thrilled and are drawing a line between inflation, public anxiety about the economy and Joe Biden’s presidency.
What is surprising is that Biden himself is helping them by citing his administration’s achievement of putting more money into people’s pockets as part of the explanation for the current spike in inflation. In a 10 November speech, Biden said, “You all got checks for $1 400. You got checks for a whole range of things,” and with the patience of an academic teaching an Economics 101 class, he went on to explain, “Well, with more people with money buying product and less product to buy, what happens? … Prices go up.”
The New York Post, a conservative-leaning paper, jumped on the speech, claiming that the president “concedes his Covid stimulus checks fuelled [the] spike in inflation”.
The paper downplayed Biden’s assertion that, “The supply chain is the reason.” In fact, the president led his audience through a fairly clear explanation of how globalisation of the economy works, has artificially driven down the cost of goods for decades, and is vulnerable to disruptions such as that caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.
Biden said, “Products like smartphones often bring together parts from France, Italy; chips from the Netherlands; touchscreens from New York State; camera components from Japan — a supply chain that crosses dozens of countries.”
He concluded, “That’s just the nature of a modern economy — the world economy,” as if the vast web of consumer manufacturing was a fact of nature rather than a systematically deregulated system designed by multinational corporations to minimise the cost of materials and labor and maximise their profits.
Recall that this was precisely what the anti-globalisation movements of the 1990s were protesting against. According to a 2007 essay by Mark Engler, protesters included, “trade unionists, environmentalists, anarchists, land rights and indigenous rights activists, organisations promoting human rights and sustainable development, opponents of privatisation, and anti-sweatshop campaigners” from all over the world who claimed that “the policies of corporate globalisation have exacerbated global poverty and increased inequality.”
When Biden explained in his speech that you “have to use wood from Brazil, graphite from India before it comes together at a factory in the United States to get a pencil”, he didn’t reveal that pencil manufacturers obtain wood from Brazil because they might be relying on illegal logging of the Amazon that drives down the price of wood. Nor did he mention that the cost of transporting goods from the far reaches of the globe generate massive carbon pollution that is driving climate change.
Rather than blaming globalisation for inflation, he concluded it was simply “the nature of a modern economy” that we rely on. Most media outlets missed this connection too. Instead, there is blame on the increasingly rare instances of the US government ensuring people have enough money to live on.
As to why Americans are so unhappy about the state of the economy? Apparently, according to Bloomberg’s Ramesh Ponnuru, it is “a frequently recurring” pattern that when wages are rising there is broad pessimism. He rightly points out that, “Wages and benefits have been moving up smartly, but only in nominal terms”, and that “positive trends would have to continue before people began to register satisfaction”.
Go back to polls conducted even before the pandemic (such as this one in 2018, and this one in 2019) and one can find widespread malaise about the state of the economy. In other words, Americans have spent decades being disappointed with the sustained suppression of wages and the trend of increasingly insecure jobs in the “gig economy.”
This may be why record numbers of people are continuing to resign in spite of their despair over the economy. The latest Bureau of Labor Statistics report found that a record 4.4 million workers resigned from their jobs in September alone, continuing a trend from August.
In addition to workers searching for jobs with better wages, The Washington Post concluded that the resignation trend is also linked to “problems finding child care.”
But if conservative Republicans have their way, you’ll see assertions that Americans are deeply unhappy about the government spending money on them and that child care subsidies and stimulus checks are at the root of the mass gloom — all readymade talking points to win back political power in the next election cycle to rein in spending.
This kind of conservative messaging includes claims that Biden “doesn’t understand just how bad inflation is hurting Americans”, and “[i]f congressional Democrats don’t stop Biden and Pelosi’s plan, a lot of Americans won’t be able to pay their heating bills this winter”, as is said in an advertisement by the conservative Club for Growth, aimed at vulnerable House Democrats.
Conservative Democrat senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia is making similar connections to justify his stymying of Biden’s proposals to expand government assistance.
The liberal Democrats’ answer to the current economic crisis is not much better, advising either that people wait out inflation, or claiming that demand for better wages fuels inflation.
Larry Summers, former economic adviser to the Obama administration, wrote earlier this year that, “Higher minimum wages, strengthened unions, increased employee benefits and strengthened regulation are all desirable, but they, too, all push up business costs and prices.” Summers echoed a Republican assertion that jobless benefits were bad for the economy, saying, “Unemployment benefits enabling workers to earn more by not working than working should surely be allowed to run out in September.”
The prevailing message to Americans from political elites across the spectrum is the same one that Biden spelled out in his speech: “That’s just the nature of a modern economy” and we have to deal with it.
A better takeaway from our current economic situation is that there is nothing natural about being at the mercy and whims of an economy designed by corporate profiteers for corporate profiteers.
This article was produced by Economy for All, a project of the Independent Media Institute.