Get more Mail & Guardian
Subscribe or Login

SA arms deal back in the spotlight

The controversy surrounding South Africa’s biggest arms-acquisition deal has resurfaced with allegations that a leading German company paid bribes to senior South African government officials or an official to secure contracts.

That prosecutors in Düsseldorf at the weekend confirmed a probe into allegations that a German ship-building consortium supplying four Corvettes to the South African navy, handed over bribes, proves rather embarrassing and comes at a bad time for the two nations.

Germany and South Africa are preparing for a highly publicised handover ceremony as Football World Cup host nations later this week, with President Thabo Mbeki and senior government officials expected to be in attendance.

South African prosecutors on Monday said they had not been informed or approached for assistance with the German probe.

”I do not know if the matter is on the radar screens or not,” an official at the National Prosecuting Authority was quoted as saying.

The latest allegations related to the arms deal also come as sacked deputy president Jacob Zuma prepares to defend himself in court against charges of, among other things, soliciting a bribe from a French arms supplier in exchange for his influence in the arms deal.

Zuma became the second South African politician charged in relation to the arms deal when his friend and financial adviser Schabir Shaik — the brother of a senior government figure in the arms acquisition deal — was convicted of fraud and corruption last year.

The former ruling African National Congress parliamentary chief whip, Tony Yengeni, is currently appealing his conviction on charges of accepting a discounted vehicle from a company linked to a European arms supplier with links to the arms deal.

Opposition politician Patricia de Lille, among the first to raise questions over kickbacks for ruling party officials — even before the arms deal was approved in 1999 and after a government inquiry found no wrongdoing within its ranks — was portrayed in some media reports as ”vindicated”.

For many South Africans who believed that the government finding had been a ”whitewash”, especially after further evidence pointing to corruption around the country’s quest to upgrade its defence capability was heard in the Shaik trial, the German investigation signalled some hope for justice.

In June, raids on the offices of companies involved in a consortium led by Thyssen Krupp and involved in the supply of the corvettes and German-built submarines, were conducted by investigators in various Germany cities, according to German news magazine Der Spiegel.

Documents were scrutinised or seized as part of the investigation at the offices of consortium partners Blohm and Voss in Hamburg, HDW in the Baltic port of Kiel, Thyssen Rheinstahl Technik and MAN Ferrostall in the western city of Essen.

Prosecutors suspected the equivalent of $19-million may have been paid in bribes and concealed in the shipbuilder’s accounts as ”expenses.” Possible charges included bribery and tax evasion, prosecutors said.

German authorities were initially keen to probe allegations of corruption related to an arms deal with Saudi Arabia and the affairs of an allegedly corrupt liberal who was accused of shady dealings before his death in 2003.

But their findings relating to money paid to South Africans detailed in Der Spiegel have implications for South Africa.

”The company Thyssen Krupp did not deny that money was paid. The question in Germany is not if bribes have been paid, but when,” said Markus Schmidt of Monitor, an investigative television programme broadcast in Germany that also covered the expose.

In February 1999, Germany outlawed payments classed as ”useful expenses” that often amounted to nothing more than bribes.

Schmidt said prosecutors had acted in part on a letter received from an unnamed source in South Africa in 2002, in which it was alleged that unspecified millions had been paid to a single individual from South Africa on behalf of the Corvette suppliers via a bank account in Switzerland.

The South African arms deal was approved by Parliament in September 1999 amid controversy.

Arms suppliers from Germany, Sweden, Italy and Britain were selected to provide defence equipment and systems that would effectively replace ageing and outdated systems and modernise South Africa’s army, navy and air force.

Although German arms suppliers began courting South Africa in the mid 1990s, the prospects of doing business with the post-apartheid state did not look good shortly before the deal was approved.

Shortly after it became obvious that German bidders would not be included in the deal, Mbeki made a surprise announcement that the issue remained wide open.

Der Spiegel said that Germany then moved to the front in a complicated tendering procedure and an order for the four warships was signed on December 3 1999.

For Germany, the case involving allegations of bribes for South Africa is a part of a complicated puzzle related to the nature of dealings of its mighty arms suppliers abroad.

In South Africa, many will follow developments in Germany that might reveal the identity of the person or persons with the fat Swiss bank account who cashed in on the young democracy’s first big shopping spree. — Sapa-dpa

Subscribe for R500/year

Thanks for enjoying the Mail & Guardian, we’re proud of our 36 year history, throughout which we have delivered to readers the most important, unbiased stories in South Africa. Good journalism costs, though, and right from our very first edition we’ve relied on reader subscriptions to protect our independence.

Digital subscribers get access to all of our award-winning journalism, including premium features, as well as exclusive events, newsletters, webinars and the cryptic crossword. Click here to find out how to join them and get a 57% discount in your first year.

Benita Van Eyssen
Benita Van Eyssen
Benita Van Eyssen works from Germany. foreign correspondent/editor/native of nowhere Benita Van Eyssen has over 53 followers on Twitter.

Related stories


If you’re reading this, you clearly have great taste

If you haven’t already, you can subscribe to the Mail & Guardian for less than the cost of a cup of coffee a week, and get more great reads.

Already a subscriber? Sign in here


Subscribers only

Mabuza’s Russian jaunts and the slippery consequences of medical tourism

For more than five years the deputy president has remained steadfast in his right to travel abroad to receive medical treatment

Zondo commission: 10 unanswered questions

Zuma went to jail rather than testify. Some who did told blatant lies. Who decided Cabinet appointments and how much money was carried out of Saxonwold?

More top stories

Ugandan teachers turn to coffin-making after schools close

The Covid-19 pandemic resulted in the country’s schools closing and teachers being left without jobs

Mabuza’s Russian jaunts and the slippery consequences of medical tourism

For more than five years the deputy president has remained steadfast in his right to travel abroad to receive medical treatment

A new book asks the timeless question: ‘Can We Be...

Ziyanda Stuurman’s new book critiques the South African police and their role in society

‘These people are barbarians’: Police torture in Southern Africa

In Botswana, South Africa and Zimbabwe torture is used to extract information, elicit confessions, punish or sometimes for sadistic reasons

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…