The United States Supreme Court stepped into a dispute over free speech rights on Friday involving a suspended high school student and his banner that proclaimed ”Bong Hits 4 Jesus”.
Justices agreed to hear the appeal by the Juneau, Alaska, school board and principal Deborah Morse of a lower court ruling that allowed the student’s civil rights lawsuit to proceed. The school board hired former special prosecutor Kenneth Starr to argue its case to the high court.
Morse suspended Frederick after he displayed the banner, with its reference to a pipe used to smoke marijuana, when the Olympic torch passed through Juneau in 2002 on its way to the Winter Games in Salt Lake City.
Frederick, then a senior, was off school property when he hoisted the banner but was suspended for violating the school’s policy of promoting illegal substances at a school-sanctioned event.
The school board upheld the suspension and a federal judge initially dismissed Frederick’s lawsuit before the Ninth Circuit US Court of Appeals called the banner vague and nonsensical, but said that Frederick’s civil rights had been violated.
At that point, the school board hired Starr, who investigated president Bill Clinton’s relationship with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. He took the case free of charge.
The appeals court said that even if the banner could be construed as a positive message about marijuana use, the school could not punish or censor a student’s speech because it promotes a social message contrary to one the school favours.
Frederick said his motivation for unfurling the banner, at least 4,3m long, was simple: He wanted it seen on television since the torch relay event was being covered by local stations. When Morse saw it, she crossed the street from the school, grabbed the banner and crumpled it. She later suspended Frederick for 10 days.
Morse still works for the Juneau school system, but is no longer the high school principal. Frederick is a student at the University of Idaho.
The court is expected to hear arguments in the case in late February. In addition to the free speech constitutional issue, the court also will consider whether Morse can be held personally liable for monetary damages.
The appeals panel said she could be held liable because she freely admitted to being aware of the pertinent case law regarding student rights. The court said the law was clear and Morse was aware of it when she punished Frederick. – Sapa-AP