Scientists warned this week that global warming will be “stronger than expected and sooner than expected”, after a new analysis showed carbon dioxide is accumulating in the atmosphere much faster than predicted.
Experts said the rise was caused by soaring economic development in China, and a reduction in the amount of carbon pollution soaked up by the world’s land and oceans. It also meant human emissions would have to be cut more sharply than predicted to avoid the likely effects.
Corinne le Quere, a climate expert at the University of East Anglia and British Antarctic Survey, who helped conduct the study, said: “It’s bad news because the increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide has accelerated since 2000 in a way we did not expect. My biggest worry is if people are discouraged by this and do nothing. I hope political leaders will act on this, because we need to do something fast.”
The study exceeds even the gloomy predictions of this year’s report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The panel, which shared this year’s Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore, said there were only eight years left to prevent the worst effects of global warming by acting to curb emissions.
Le Quere said: “We are emitting far more than anticipated when the panel’s scenarios were drawn up in the late 1990s.” Global carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel burning has risen by an average 2,9% each year since 2000. During the 1990s the annual rise was 0,7%.
The new study explains abnormally high carbon dioxide measurements highlighted by The Guardian in January. At the time, scientists were puzzled by dozens of measuring stations across the world showing a CO2 spike for 2006, the fourth year in the past five to show a sharp increase in the greenhouse gas.
Carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere is measured in parts per million (ppm); from 1970 to 2000 the concentration rose by about 1,5ppm each year; since 2000 the annual rise has leapt to an average 1,9ppm.
The new study, published in the US journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, says three processes have contributed to this increase: growth in the world economy, heavy use of coal in China, and a weakening of natural “sinks” — forests, seas and soils that absorb carbon.
Pep Canadell, executive director of the Global Carbon Project, which carried out the research, said: “In addition to the growth of global population and wealth, we now know that significant contributions to the growth of atmospheric CO2 arise from the slowdown of natural sinks and the halt to improvements in the carbon intensity of wealth production.”
The overall growth of the economy is the only one of the three factors accounted for in scientists’ forecasts of climate change, which means the growth in atmospheric CO2 is about 35% larger than they expected. About half of this is down to the Chinese reliance on coal, which has forced up the carbon intensity of the overall world economy since 2000, reversing a trend of increasing energy efficiency since the 1970s. The rest of the rise is explained by the weakening of the natural carbon sinks.
Scientists assume that about half of human carbon emissions are reabsorbed into the environment, but computer models predict that increased temperatures will reduce this effect. The Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences report is the most convincing evidence so far that the global sinks have weakened in the past 50 years, though the large natural variations in carbon exchange between the Earth and the atmosphere mean the team can be only 89% certain they have found an effect, short of the usual 95% confidence required to publish scientific findings. — Â