Uproar over first German post-war reprint of Mein Kampf

Historians have welcomed news that Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf will be reprinted in Germany for the first time since the Nazi dictator’s fall in 1945, just as Holocaust survivors hit out at the move.

British publisher Peter McGee said he would issue excerpts from the anti-Semitic manifesto, which laid out the Fuehrer’s vision long before he took power in 1933, alongside commentary putting the work in historical context.

Academics said the time had come for some of the taboos surrounding the book in Germany to fall.

“I think we have a very inhibited approach to this material in Germany. You can read this book around the world — there is even a Hebrew translation in Israel,” said journalism professor Horst Poettker, who is providing some of the annotation for the project.

Playing with fire

“I think we should present it to as broad an audience as possible because it is the best way to learn what the National Socialists were thinking and what was so attractive about this ideology.”

However Jewish groups were sharply divided about the prospect, with some saying McGee was playing with fire.


“Holocaust survivors are appalled at the insensitivity and crass commercialism that would motivate the publication of Hitler’s hate-filled book in the historic cradle of the Nazi terror regime,” said Elan Steinberg of the American Gathering of Holocaust Survivors and their Descendants.

“The mercenary effort to publish this infamous work in Germany is not only a moral offence to the memory of all Nazi victims — Jew and non-Jew — but is also an insult to modern-day Germany which has mightily struggled to separate itself from its dark past.”

Steinberg called on the state of Bavaria, which holds the rights to all publications from the main Nazi publishing house, to take the legal steps to block the publication.

The Bavarian justice ministry said it was reviewing such measures due to possible copyright violations.

‘Diabolical Nazi Bible’

McGee said that “a brochure of 12 to 15 pages” would be published on January 26 with excerpts from Mein Kampf printed on one side and commentary from a well-known historian on the opposite page.

“Everyone knows [the book] and sees it as a sort of diabolical Nazi Bible,” he said, adding: “But people haven’t read it and therefore haven’t seen that it is the poor-quality and confused work of a totally twisted mind.”

The front of the historical review entitled Zeitungszeugen (Periodical Witnesses) in which the excerpts are featured presents a portrait of Hitler, his face cut off above the clipped mustache and set against a turquoise background.

The head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, Dieter Graumann, grudgingly gave his approval.

“Of course it would be better if it were not published but if it has to be published, it must be accompanied by historians’ commentary,” he said.

Mein Kampf
(My Struggle) is not banned as such in Germany.

Racist manifesto
But since the end of World War II, Bavaria, which holds the rights until 2015 — 70 years after the Nazi dictator’s death — has not permitted reprints.

The book, written in 1924 when Hitler was languishing in a Bavarian prison, combines elements of autobiography and sets out his views on Aryan racial purity, his hatred of Jews and his opposition to communism.

Around 10-million copies were published in Germany until 1945, according to British historian Ian Kershaw. From 1936, every German couple marrying received a copy as a wedding gift from the Nazi state.

Because the book was so prevalent in German homes, “you would have been criminalising a large part of the population had it been outlawed” after the war, Berlin lawyer Tim Hoesmann explained.

McGee said he intended to put out weekly excerpts with a circulation of around 100 000.
The publisher has been involved in disputed projects in Germany before.

In 2009, he caused a stir when he began selling reprints of the Nazi propaganda newspaper Voelkischer Beobachter (People’s Observer) with comments from historians.

Bavaria launched a legal challenge to the series but succeeded only in blocking the sale of editions from after the war’s outbreak in 1939. — Sapa-AFP

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Yannick Pasquet
Yannick Pasquet works from Berlin. Journaliste AFP à Berlin. Il est beaucoup question d'Allemagne, d'immigration et de réfugiés, pas mal de Grèce. Auteure Le Mur dans les têtes (Ed. du Moment) Yannick Pasquet has over 5610 followers on Twitter.

Related stories

Advertising

Subscribers only

How lottery execs received dubious payments through a private company

The National Lottery Commission is being investigated by the SIU for alleged corruption and maladministration, including suspicious payments made to senior NLC employees between 2016 and 2017

Pandemic hobbles learners’ futures

South African schools have yet to open for the 2021 academic year and experts are sounding the alarm over lost learning time, especially in the crucial grades one and 12

More top stories

Zuma, Zondo play the waiting game

The former president says he will talk once the courts have ruled, but the head of the state capture inquiry appears resigned to letting the clock run out as the commission's deadline nears

Disinformation harms health and democracy

Conspiracy theorists abuse emotive topics to suck the air out of legitimate debate and further their own sinister agendas

Uganda: ‘I have never seen this much tear-gas in an...

Counting was slow across Uganda as a result of the internet shutdown, which affected some of the biometric machines used to validate voter registrations.

No way out for Thales in arms deal case, court...

The arms manufacturer has argued that there was no evidence to show that it was aware of hundreds of indirect payments to Jacob Zuma, but the court was not convinced.
Advertising

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…