‘Girls’: Little to like in this show that we love

There are some television shows that achieve a peculiar combination of mass popularity and critical acclaim, and are consequently so talked-about that it feels like watching them has been made mandatory. The most obvious examples of this phenomenon are Mad Men and Game of Thrones. If you don’t watch either of them, there’s a distinct possibility that you feel left out in many a workplace conversation.

Girls, which is returning for a second season on M-Net, is another series that has taken on this aura of cultural importance. Viewers of Girls are seemingly driven to discuss and analyse the series with a level of obsession that is more typically associated with people who attend sci-fi conventions.

This trend reached its apogee last month when Kareem Abdul-Jabbar, a retired basketball legend and seemingly unlikely fan of Girls, saw fit to pen an essay on the series for the Huffington Post. It’s just that type of show.

This level of hype is all the more striking because Girls is not an immediately likeable series. It’s a show full of unpleasant characters and unpleasant situations, and this can be off-putting to new viewers. Yet with every new episode I become more deeply convinced that the hype is justified — that Girls is in fact completely awesome.

The easiest way to understand Girls is in relation to its spiritual predecessor, Sex and the City. Superficially, they have a lot in ­common. They’re both produced by the same cable channel, HBO. They’re both shows about four young women living in New York City, and their various personal adventures. But this is where the similarities end.

Sex and the City was fundamentally a product of the Clinton-era boom years. Though Carrie and her friends had their share of problems, their lifestyle was ultimately treated as glamorous and aspirational. By contrast, Girls is a window into the more sombre United States of the Obama era, with its economic anxieties and damaged sense of idealism.

Girls deconstructs the core premise of young, single, attractive people living in a city, and suggests that the end result is not nearly as idyllic as what most television writers would have us believe.

It presents city life as something that is liberating, but also alienating. Money is a constant source of concern, at least for those characters who are not being supported by their parents. And the characters are so vain and self-involved that they end up feeling isolated from the world, and from each other.

Everyone has lots of sex, of course. But Girls does not seek to titillate its audience, which is actually a refreshing change in this age of mass availability of pornography. There is something perceptive, I think, about the disconnect between the brash confidence with which the Girls characters talk about sex, and their awkwardness and vulnerability when actually doing it.

Perhaps it sounds like Girls is a downer, and some of the time it is. Fortunately, it makes up for it by being frequently hilarious. Viewers who enjoyed the first season will be pleased to know that there is plenty of insanity waiting in store for them.

Hannah (Lena Dunham), the ­principal character of the series, is dating a black Republican after causing her season one boyfriend to get hit by a truck. Jessa (Jemima Kirke), now married, makes the faux pas of telling her husband’s parents that she used to be a heroin addict. Shoshanna (Zosia Mamet) is learning that her new boyfriend is little more than a hobo. And Marnie (Allison Williams), the most conventionally successful of the girls throughout season one, is now the group’s biggest loser.

Overall, Girls’ second season feels more dramatic and slightly less comedic than the first, which is a natural (if not entirely welcome) evolution. But the series still has a talent for making the everyday messiness of human relationships seem significant, even profound.

Perhaps that’s the simplest ­explanation for the enduring ­mystery of Girls’s appeal: the ­question of how a series that seems so unlikeable on paper ends up being one of the most delightful shows on television.

<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Rjz6tKEkCPA" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Girls is shown on Tuesdays at 8pm on M-Net

Subscribe to the M&G

These are unprecedented times, and the role of media to tell and record the story of South Africa as it develops is more important than ever.

The Mail & Guardian is a proud news publisher with roots stretching back 35 years, and we’ve survived right from day one thanks to the support of readers who value fiercely independent journalism that is beholden to no-one. To help us continue for another 35 future years with the same proud values, please consider taking out a subscription.

Laurence Caromba
Laurence Caromba works from Pretoria, South Africa. I teach International Studies at Monash SA. I tweet about culture, politics, technology, foreign affairs & anything else that interests me. Views my own. Laurence Caromba has over 165 followers on Twitter.

Related stories


Subscribers only

Q&A Sessions: Marcia Mayaba —Driven to open doors for women

Marcia Mayaba has been in the motor industry for 24 years, donning hats that include receptionist, driver, fuel attendant, dealer principal and now chief...

The war on women in video game culture

Women and girls make up almost half of the gaming community but are hardly represented and face abuse in the industry

More top stories

Gatvol Capetonians, EFF lash out at City of Cape Town...

Public infrastructure was allegedly damaged by the activist group in 2019 and by the Economic Freedom Fighters in 2020

Masuku loses appeal against SIU report on Covid graft

The judge found that when news of improprieties were brought to his attention, Masuku did not take steps to urgently intervene

Leaking De Ruyter’s affidavit countering racism claims was ‘malicious’ and...

Mkhuleko Hlengwa has pointed to people in Eskom or the public enterprises department for making the document public

SABS ‘contemplates’ 170 retrenchments to save R150m

Salaries account for 65% of the South African Bureau of Standards’ total operating‌ costs

press releases

Loading latest Press Releases…